Objective: To assess the effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on the gait and energy parameters of walking in chronic hemiparetic subjects.
Design: With/without group comparison.
Setting: Consecutive patients recruited from the gait analysis laboratory of our rehabilitation department.
Subjects: A group of nine chronic hemiparetic patients, with the same gait pattern alteration, were evaluated during walking at free speed with and without the use of an orthosis.
Outcome measures: Gait analysis and study of energy cost.
Results and conclusion: The orthosis significantly improved self-selected speed (15.47 versus 21.39 m/min), stride cycle (2.33 versus 2.08 s), stance (1.83 versus 1.48 s) and double support (1.55 versus 1.16 s) and reduced energy cost (0.76 versus 0.49 ml O2kg/m) of walking without affecting cardiorespiratory response. Moreover, a significant correlation was found between the improvement of double support and the reduction of energy cost.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients: Standards for outcome assessment. Phys Ther1986; 66: 1530–1539.
2.
Hill KD, Goldie PA, Baker PA, Greenwood KM. Retest reliability of the temporal and distance characteristics of hemiplegic gait using a footswitch system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75: 577–583.
3.
Waters RL, Mulroy Sara. The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. Gait Posture1999; 9: 207–231.
4.
Onley SJ, Monga TN, Costigan PA. Mechanical energy of walking of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1986; 67: 92–98.
5.
Fischer SV, Gullickson G. Energy cost of ambulation in health and disability: a literature review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1978; 59: 124–133.
6.
Burdett RG, Borello-France D, Blatchly C, Potter C. Gait comparison of subjects with hemiplegia walking unbraced, with ankle-foot orthosis, and with air-stirrup brace. Phys Ther1988; 68: 1197–1203.
7.
Corcoran PJ, Jebsen RH, Brengelmann GI et al. Effects of plastic metal leg braces on speed and energy cost of hemiparetic ambulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1970; 51: 69–77.
8.
Crandall CG, Taylor SL, Raven PB. Evaluation of the Cosmed K2 portable telemetric oxygen uptake analyzer. Med Sci Sports Exerc1994; 26: 108–111.
9.
Lucia A, Fleck SJ, Gotshall RW, Kearney GT. Validity and reliability of the Cosmed K2 instrument. Int J Sports Med1993; 14: 380–386.
10.
Tyson SF, Thornton HA. The effect of a hinged ankle foot orthosis on hemiplegic gait: objective measures and users' opinions. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 53–58.
11.
Lehmann JF, Condon SM, Price R, deLateur BJ. Gait abnormalities in hemiplegia: their correction by ankle-foot orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1987; 68: 763–771.
12.
Zamparo P, Pagliaro P. The energy cost of level walking before and after hydro-kinesi therapy in patients with spastic paresis. Scand J Med Sci Sports1998; 8: 222–228.
13.
Corcoran PJ. Evaluation of plastic short leg brace. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, 1968.
14.
Hesse S, Luecke D, Jahnke MT, Maurits KH. Gait function in spastic hemiparetic patients walking barefoot, with firm shoes, and with ankle-foot orthosis. Int J Rehabil Res1996; 19: 133–141.
15.
Hesse S, Werner C, Matthias K, Stephen K, Berteanu M. Non-velocity related effects of a rigid double stopped ankle-foot orthosis on gait and lower limb muscle activity of hemiparetic subjects with an equinovarus deformity. Stroke1999; 30: 1855–1861.
16.
Diamond MF, Ottembacher KJ. Effect of a tone-inhibiting dynamic ankle-foot orthosis on stride characteristics of an adult with hemiparesis. Phys Ther1990; 70: 423–430.
17.
Zamparo P, Francescato MP, De Luca G, Lovati L, di Prampero PE. The energy cost of level walking in patients with hemiplegia. Scand J Med Sci Sports1995; 5: 348–352.
18.
Waters RL, Hislop EJ, Perry J, Antonelli D. Energy cost of normal and pathologic gait. Orthop Clin North Am1978; 9: 351–377.
19.
Lehmann JF. Biomechanics of ankle-foot orthoses: prescription and design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1979; 60: 200–207.
20.
Perry J, Montgomery J. Gait of the stroke patient and orthotic indications. Stroke Rehabil1987; 246–283.
21.
Esquenazi A, Hirai B. Assessment of gait and orthotic prescription. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am1991; 2: 473–485.
