Objective: To evaluate the central haemodynamic responses during position changes from supine to sitting and during 30 min of standing between able-bodied and spinal cord-injured subjects. Also to assess the effects of the physiologic muscle pump in both groups during 30 min of standing.
Design: A repeated measure design. Both groups were tested on two different days under two conditions of 30 min of stationary standing and 30 min of dynamic standing (voluntary activation of the lower leg muscles in able-bodied and FES-induced activation of these muscles in spinal cord injured). The order of testing was random.
Setting: Rehabilitation hospital.
Subjects: Fifteen healthy able-bodied and 14 healthy spinal cord-injured subjects.
Main outcome measured: Stroke volume, cardiac output, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance during supine–pre sitting, sitting–pre standing and during 30 min of standing.
Results: Significant reductions (p< 0.05) in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were found when spinal cord-injured subjects moved from sitting to standing during stationary standing; these values were maintained during dynamic standing. These values were maintained during both standing sessions in able-bodied subjects. During 30 min of stationary standing, there were significant reductions in stroke volume, cardiac output in both able-bodied and spinal cord-injured while their total peripheral resistance increased (p< 0.05). During 30 min of dynamic standing, both groups maintained their haemodynamics at pre-standing values with the exception of significant reduction in stroke volume at 30 min of standing.
Conclusion: FES-induced activation of the physiologic muscle pump during change in position from sitting to standing prevented orthostatic hypotension in spinal cord-injured subjects. During standing it had equal or even greater effect on improving blood circulation when compared with voluntary activation in able-bodied subjects. The use of FES during standing and tilting in spinal cord-injured individuals may prevent orthostatic hypotension and circulatory hypokinesis and improve tolerance to tilting and standing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Figoni SF. Cardiovascular and haemodynamic responses to tilting and to standing in tetraplegic patients: a review. Paraplegia1984; 22: 99–109.
2.
Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of medical physiology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996: 112–116, 163–227.
3.
Lopes P, Figoni SF. Current literature on orthostatic hypotension and training in SCI patients. Am Corr Ther J1982; 36: 56–59.
4.
Krebs M, Ragnarrson KT, Tuckman J. Orthostatic vasomotor response to in spinal man. Paraplegia1983; 21: 72–80.
5.
Rowell LB. Human circulation regulation during physical stress. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986: 148–167.
6.
Alimi YS, Barthelemy P, Juhan C. Venous pump of the calf: a study of venous and muscular pressure. J Vasc Surg1994; 20: 728–735.
7.
Hirsch DR, Goldhaber SZ. Medical risk factors. In: Goldhaber SZ ed. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993.
8.
Topham SW, Warner HR. The control of cardiac output during exercise. In: Reeve EB, Guryon AC eds. Physical basis of circulatory transport: regulation and exchange. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co., 1967: 77–90.
9.
Blackmer J. Orthostatic hypotension in spinal cord-injured patients. J Spinal Cord Med1997; 20: 212–217.
10.
Wall BM, Runyan KR, Williams HH et al. Characteristics of vasopressin release during controlled reduction in arterial pressure. J Lab Clin Med1994; 124: 554–563.
11.
Faghri PD, Hovorka CF, Votto JD. Venous haemodynamics of the lower extremities in response to electrical stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79: 842–848.
12.
Faghri PD, Van Meerdervort HFP, Glaser RM, Figoni SF. Electrical stimulation-induced contraction to reduce blood stasis during arthroplasty. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng1997; 5: 62–69.
13.
Faghri PD, Hovorka CF, Pesce WJ. A comparison of three mechanical interventions in reducing lower limb edema in stroke patients. Proceedings of the RESNA'98 Annual Conference 1998: 238–240.
14.
American Spinal Injury Association/International Medical Society of Paraplegia. International standards for neurological classification of spinal injury patients. Revised 1992.
15.
Northridge DB, Findlay IN, Wilson J, Henderson E, Dargie HJ. Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance. Br Heart J1990; 63: 93–97.
16.
Ebert TJ, Smith JJ, Barney JA, Merrill DC, Smith GK. The use of thoracic impedance for determining thoracic blood volume changes in man. Aviat Space Environ Med1986; 49–53.
17.
Kravtsova EL, Voronkov IUI. Use of the method of thoracic electric bioimpedance in medical evaluation of central hemodynamics in man. Aviakosm Ekolog Med1995; 29: 52–54.
18.
Christopoulus D, Nicolaides AN, Cook A, Irvine A, Galloway JMD, Wilkinson A. Pathogenesis of venous ulceration in relation to the calf muscle pump function. Surgery1989; 106: 829–835.
19.
Glenn MB, Berman SB. Cardiovascular changes following spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil1997; 2: 47–53.
20.
Dixon WJ ed. BMDP statistical software manual. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990; 1: 521–564.
21.
Faghri, PD, Glaser RM, Figoni SF. Functional electrical stimulation leg cycle ergometer exercise: Training effects on cardiorespiratory responses of spinal cord-injured subjects at rest and during submaximal exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 73: 1085–1093.
22.
Figoni SF, Glaser RM, Rodgers MM et al. Acute haemodynamic responses of spinal cord-injured individuals to functional neuromuscular stimulation-induced knee extension exercise. J Rehabil Res Dev1991; 28: 4: 9–18.
Corbett JL, Frankel HL, Harris PJ. Cardiovascular responses to tilting in tetraplegic man. J Physiol (Lond)1971; 215: 411–431.
25.
Gonzalez F, Chang JY, Banovac K, Messina D, Martinez-Arizala A, Kelley RE. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in patients with orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury. Paraplegia1991; 29: 1–7.
26.
McLachlin J, McLachlin AD. The peripheral venous heart. AMA Arch Surg1958; 77: 568–575.
27.
Phillips WT, Kiratli BJ, Sarkarati M et al. Effect of spinal cord injury on the heart and cardiovascular fitness. Curr Probl Cardiol1998; 23: 641–720.
28.
Phillips W, Burkett LN, Munro R, Davis M, Pomeroy K. Relative changes in blood flow with functional electrical stimulation during exercise of the paralyzed lower limbs. Paraplegia1995; 33: 90–93.
29.
Hillegass EA, Dudley GA. Surface electrical stimulation of skeletal muscle after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord1999; 37: 251–257.
30.
Nash MS, Montalvo BM, Applegate B. Lower extremity blood flow and responses to occlusion ischemia differ in exercise-trained and sedentary tetraplegic persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996; 77: 1260–1265.
31.
Nash MS. Exercise reconditioning of the heart and peripheral circulation after spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil1998; 3: 1–15.
32.
Maury M. About orthostatic hypotension in tetraplegic individuals reflections and experience. Spinal Cord1998; 36: 87–90.
