Objective: To assess the specific effect of delivery of the first child on the integrity of the pelvic floor musculature.
Design: A prospective study of two groups of females with no symptoms of urinary incontinence.
Setting: Physiotherapy Department, Rotunda Lying In Hospital, Dublin.
Subjects: Two groups of healthy female physiotherapists (age range 20–28 years) were recruited for the study: group 1 consisted of nulliparous females (n = 10) and group 2 consisted of primiparous females who were 9–10 months post delivery (n = 10).
Intervention and main outcome measures: Assessment of the pelvic floor musculature was performed by digital assessment, electromyography and perineometry.
Results: For all data, the nulliparous group showed evidence of greater pelvic floor strength and endurance. Analysis of anterior and posterior electromyography data showed significantly stronger contractions in the nulliparous group (p = 0.0001 and 0.044). During a maximum contraction of the pelvic floor muscles, the anterior resting EMG activity increased by 9 ± 6 µV (mean ± SD) in the primiparous group compared with an increment of 22.3 ± 4.74 µV in the nulliparous group. Posterior EMG resting activity increased by 19.7 ± 7.65 µV (mean ± SD) in the nulliparous group compared with 13.8 ± 8.19 µV in the primiparous group. There were significant differences between the two groups for the four types of digital muscle assessment (p < 0.0013). In addition, there was a greater increase in perineometry readings in the nulliparous group (increment = 5.6 ± 2.5, mean ± SD) compared with the primiparous group (increment = 3.1 ± 0.9; mean ± SD).
Conclusions: This study suggests that irrespective of lack of symptoms of urinary incontinence, it would appear advisable that all women should undertake a prescribed programme of pelvic floor rehabilitation exercises after childbirth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen RE, Hoskert GL, Smith ARB, Warrell DW. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth; a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1990; 97: 770–779.
2.
Lee SJ, Park JW. Follow-up evaluation of the effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum2000; 43: 1550–1555.
3.
MacArthur C, Bick DE, Keighley MRB. Incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1997; 104: 46–50.
4.
Fitzpatrick M, O’Herlihy C. Vaginal birth and perineal trauma. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol2000; 12: 487–490.
5.
Snooks SJ, Barnes PRH, Swash M, Henry MM. Damage to the innervation of the pelvic floor musculature in chronic constipation. Gastroenterology1985; 89: 977–981.
6.
Spence-Jones C, Kamm MA, Henry MM. Bowel dysfunction: a pathological factor in uterovaginal prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1994; 101: 147–152.
7.
Marshall K, Thompson KA, Walsh DM, Baxter GD. Incidence of urinary incontinence and constipation during pregnancy and post-partum: survey of current findings at the rotunda lying in hospital. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1998; 105: 400–402.
8.
Chiarelli PE, O’Keefe DR. Physiotherapy for the pelvic floor. Aust J Physiother1981; 27: 103–108.
9.
Laycock J. Assessment and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction. Doctoral thesis. Postgraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bradford, 1992.
10.
Dimpfi TH, Jaeger CH, Mueller-Felber W et al. Myogenic changes of the levator ani muscle in premenopausal women: the impact of vaginal delivery and age. Neurourol Urodynamics1998; 17: 197–205.
