Objective: To verify if partial or total limitation of degrees of freedom at ankle joints could help patients with balance disorders in standing and walking.
Design: A cross-over design was chosen. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) were tested in three experimental conditions: barefooted, wearing ankle foot orthoses (AFOs), and wearing AFOs that allowed plantar flexion.
Setting: Neurorehabilitation unit in a rehabilitation centre.
Subjects: Fourteen patients suffering from MS with mild strength problems and balance disorders that required them to use walking aids outside.
Main outcome measures: Tests inferring static and dynamic skills were carried out in the three experimental conditions described above.
Results: Improvements were obtained in static balance tests especially wearing dynamic AFOs; the number of patients who were able to pass tasks on balance in upright position such as flstanding with feet together, head extended' increased from three to nine. Dynamic balance was impaired especially with static AFOs; the time spent walking 10 metres with these orthoses increased by 172% with respect to barefoot; less difference (113%) has been reported wearing dynamic AFOs.
Conclusion: Static and dynamic AFOs improved static balance, while dynamic balance was impaired especially by static AFOs; less negative influence on dynamic balance has been found while wearing dynamic AFOs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Chen C-L, Yeung K-T, Wang C-H et al. Anterior ankle-foot orthosis effects on postural stability in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 1587–1592.
2.
Mojica JA, Nakamura R, Kobayashi T et al. Effect of ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) on body sway and walking capacity of hemiparetic stroke patients. J Exp Med1988; 156: 395–401.
3.
Lehmann JF, Condon S, Price R, deLateur BJ. Gait abnormalities in hemiplegia: correction by ankle-foot orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 76: 763–771.
4.
Horak F, Nashner L. Central programming of postural movements adaptations to altered support surface configuration. J Neurophysiol1986; 55: 1369–1381.
5.
Lehemann JF, Ko MJ, de Lateur BJ. Knee moment: origin in normal ambulation and modification by double-stopped ankle-foot orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1982; 63: 345–351.
6.
Balmaseda M-T, Koozekanani SH, Fatehi MT et al. Ground reaction forces, center of pressure, and duration of stance with or without ankle-foot orthosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1988; 69: 1009–1012.
7.
Abel MF, Juhl GA, Vaughan CL, Damiano DL. Gait assessment of fixed ankle-foot orthoses in children with spastic diplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79: 126–133.
8.
Park TS, Owens JH. Surgical management of spastic diplegia in cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med1992; 32: 745–749.
9.
Harris SR, Riffle K. Effects of inhibitive ankle-foot orthoses on standing balance in a child with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther1986; 66: 663–667.
10.
Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture1995; 3: 193–214.
11.
Crenna P, Frigo C, Massion J, Pedotti A. Forward and backward axial strategies in man. Exp Brain Res1987; 65: 538–548.
12.
Alpini D, Cesarani A. Vertigo and dizziness rehabilitation, the MCS method. Berlin: Springer, 2000.
13.
Tesio L, Perucca L, Franchiglion PF, Battaglia MA. A short measure of balance in multiple sclerosis: validation through rasch analysis. Funct Neurol1997; 12: 255–265.
14.
Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliability comparison of 4 measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 9–13.
15.
Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995: 154–156.
16.
Hesse S, Luecke D, Jahnke MT, Mauritz KH. Gait function in spastic hemiparetic patients walking barefoot, with firm shoes, and with ankle-foot orthosis. Int J Rehabil Res1996; 19: 133–141.
