Objective: To establish validity and reliability of two new sensory tests evaluating moving (MTP) and sustained (STP) touch-pressure and their relationship to hand function for patients with stroke. The STP had four components in which a light or heavy ball was applied passively or held actively.
Participants: Twenty-eight participants with hemiparesis (1–109 months) from rehabilitation hospitals or outpatient programmes.
Design: Content validity was established. Then reliability and concurrent and construct validity were determined. Sensation was compared with hand functional ability using the Modified Moberg recognition task, the Box and Block test and one task of the TEMPA test.
Results: Reliability: Both types of reliability were significant for MTP (ICC = 0.92) and all components of STP (ICC = 0.62 to 0.92). Concurrent validity:MTP and STP correlated significantly (r = -0.39 to -0.83) with the Semmes–Weinstein Monofilament test used as a ‘gold standard' comparison. Construct validity: MTP was significantly related to Moberg (r = 0.49). Three of four components of STP correlated with TEMPA (r = 0.49–0.53) and Moberg (0.45–0.71). Only STP (heavy ball) correlated with Box and Block (0.42–0.48). Of the four components of STP, only the passive STP (light ball) was not related to hand function.
Conclusion: The new sensory tests of moving, and three components of sustained touch-pressure were reliable. The passive STP (light ball) was discarded. All but this test were relevant to the two functional roles of sensation: exploration for MTP and dexterity during holding for STP.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Galski T, Bruno RL, Zorowitz R, Walker A. Predicting length of stay, functional outcome, and aftercare in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. Stroke1993; 24: 1794–1800.
2.
Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Current practise and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke. Clin Rehabil1999; 13: 48–55.
3.
Lincoln NB, Jackson JM, Adams SA. Reliability and revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy1998; 84: 358–365.
4.
Bassetti C, Bogousslavsky J, Regli F. Sensory syndromes in parietal stroke. Neurology1993; 43: 1942–1949.
5.
Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE. Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training in tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 602–611.
6.
Johansson RS, Cole KJ. Sensory-motor coordination during grasping and manipulative actions. Curr Opin Neurobiol1992; 2: 815–823.
7.
Kunesch E, Binkofski F, Steinmetz H, Freund H. The pattern of motor deficits in relation to the site of stroke lesions. Eur Neurol1995; 35: 20–26.
8.
Bell-Krotowski J, Tomancik E. The repeatability of testing with Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Surg1987; 12A: 155–161.
9.
Saddiki-Traki F, Tremblay N, Dykes RW, Derraz S, El-Khamlichi A. Differences between the tactile sensitivity on the anterior torso of normal individuals and those having suffered complete transection of the spinal cord. Somatosens Mot Res1999; 16: 263–273.
10.
Dannenbaum RM, Dykes RW. Evaluating sustained touch-pressure in severe sensory deficits: meeting an unanswered need. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1990; 71: 455–459.
11.
Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke1993; 24: 58–63.
12.
Dellon AL. Evaluation of sensibility and re-education of sensation of the hand. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1981.
13.
Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther1985; 36: 386–391.
14.
Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Bravo G, Dutil E. Upper extremity performance test for the elderly (TEMPA): Normative data and correlates with sensorimotor parameters. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 1125–1129.
15.
Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Dutil E, Bravo G. Development and reliability of an upper extremity function test for the elderly: the TEMPA. Can J Occup Ther1993; 60: 9–16.
16.
Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Dutil E, Bravo G, Mercier L. Validity of a measurement instrument for upper extremity performance: the TEMPA. Occup Ther J Res1994; 14: 267–281.
17.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
18.
Van Boven RW, Johnson KO. A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans. Brain1994; 117: 149–167.
19.
Johansson RS, Hager C, Backstrom L. Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. Exp Brain Res1992; 89: 204–213.
