Objective: To compare hospital and home settings for the rehabilitation of patients following hip fracture.
Design: Randomized controlled trial comparing accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation (n = 34) with conventional hospital care (n = 32) for patients admitted to hospital with hip fracture.
Setting: Three metropolitan hospitals in Adelaide, Australia. Subjects: Sixty-six patients with fractured hip. Interventions: Patients assigned to the home-based rehabilitation group were discharged within 48 hours of randomization. The project team therapists made visits to the patient’s home and negotiated a set of realistic, short-term and measurable treatment goals with both the patient and carer. Those randomized to usual care remained in hospital for conventional rehabilitation.
Main outcome measures: Physical and social dependence, balance con”dence, quality of life, carer strain, patient and carer satisfaction, use of community services and incidence of adverse events such as re-admission and falls.
Results: While there was no difference between the groups for all measures of quality of life, patients in the accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation group recorded a greater improvement in MBI from randomization (p < 0.05) and scored higher on the Falls Ef”cacy Scale (p < 0.05) at four months. There was no difference in falls rates. Patients in the home-based rehabilitation group had a shorter stay in hospital (p < 0.05) but a longer stay in rehabilitation overall (p < 0.001). The groups were comparable on the rate and length of admissions after discharge, use of community services, need for carer input and contact with general practitioner (GP) after discharge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cameron I, Crotty M, Currie C et al. Geriatric rehabilitation following fractures in older people: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess (Rockville Md)2000; 4: I–IV,1–111.
2.
Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation. Consultancy to progress hospital in the home care provision. University of Sydney, 1998.
3.
Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalised patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study 1. N Engl J Med1991; 324: 370–376.
4.
Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Devlin N, McGee R, Campbell AJ. Effectiveness and economic evaluation of a nurse delivered home exercise programme to prevent falls. 2: Controlled trial in multiple centres. BMJ2001; 322: 701–704.
5.
Hollingworth W, Todd C, Parker M et al. Cost analysis of early discharge after hip fracture. BMJ1993; 307: 903–906.
6.
Cameron ID, Lyle D, Quine S. Accelerated rehabilitation after proximal femoral fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil1993; 15: 29–34.
7.
O’Cathain A. Evaluation of a Hospital at Home scheme for the early discharge of patients with fractured neck of femur. J Public Health Med1994; 16: 205–210.
8.
Pryor GA, Williams DRR. Rehabilitation after hip fracture: home and hospital management compared. J Bone Joint Surg71B: 471–474.
9.
Shepperd S, Harwood D, Jenkinson C et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. I: three month follow up of health outcomes. BMJ1998; 316: 1786–1791.
10.
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol1989; 42: 703–709.
11.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh, PR. ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res1975; 12: 189–198.
12.
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-physical and mental health summary scale: a users manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, 1994.
13.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed ‘up & go’: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc1991; 39: 142–148.
14.
Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Con”dence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci1995; 50A: M28–M34.
15.
Tinetti ME, Richman D, Powell L. Falls ef”cacy as a measure of fear of falling. J Gerontol45: 239–243.
16.
Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JT, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health1992; 2: 7–11.
17.
Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care1994; 3: 11–16.
18.
Robinson BC. Validation of a caregiver strain index. J Gerontol1983; 38: 344–348.
19.
Crotty M, Kittel A, Hayball N. Home rehabilitation for older adults with fractured hips: how many will take part?J Qual Clin Pract2000; 20: 65–68.
20.
Shepperd S, Harwood D, Jenkinson C et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home with inpatient hospital care: I: three month follow up of health outcomes. BMJ1998; 316: 1786–1791.
21.
Farnworth MG, Kenny P, Shiell A. The costs and effects of early discharge in the management of fractured hip. Age Ageing1984; 23: 190–194.
22.
Tinetti ME, Baker DI, Gottschalk M et al. Systematic home-based physical and functional therapy for older persons after hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1997; 1237–1248.
