Objective: To explore the range of functional dif”culties and compensatory mechanisms reported by individuals with a wrist disorder, to provide a basis for development of a patient-focused outcome instrument.
Design: Descriptive study using a qualitative, interview-based framework.
Setting/subjects: A volunteer sample of individuals, who were diagnosed with a unilateral, localized wrist disorder, were recruited from a wide range of health care settings situated in different socio-economic and geographic areas of Adelaide, Australia. Recruitment continued until theoretical saturation of the data occurred.
Interventions: Semi-structured, audiotaped interviews were conducted with each individual to elicit information concerning ‘how your wrist disorder has affected your ability to perform daily activities’.
Main outcome measures: Trends regarding reporting of dif”cult activities and compensatory mechanisms used.
Results: Forty-two individuals were interviewed. This was the point where theoretical saturation of research information had been reached. A few individuals reported dif”culty with functional tasks prior to wrist injury. Following diagnosis, a wide range of dif”culties, which included heavy, gross and ”ne motor activities, was reported. Compensatory mechanisms were used by all individuals, with requesting someone else to do the task, using the other hand, and using other parts of the body to lift or grasp being the most common.
Conclusions: Current wrist outcome instruments do not contain the full range of dif”cult activities that were elicited from our sample, which casts doubt on these instruments’ ability to fully measure change in capacity. Our results should provide the basis for the development of a relevant, sensitive, patient-focused outcome instrument.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Grieco A, Molteni G, de Vito G, Sias N. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders due to biomechanical overload. Ergonomics1998; 41: 1253–1260.
2.
Larsen CF, Lauritsen J. Epidemiology of acute wrist trauma. Int J Epidemiol1993; 22: 911–916.
3.
Morgan RL, Linder MM. Common wrist injuries. Am Family Physician1997; 53: 857–868.
4.
Nordstrom DL, De Stefano F, Vierkant RA, Layde PM. Incidence of diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. Epidemiology1998; 9: 342–345.
5.
Prince RL, Knuiman MW, Gulland L. Fracture prevalence in an Australian population. Aust J Public Health1993; 17: 124–128.
6.
Szabo RM, Steinberg DR. Nerve entrapment syndromes in the wrist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg1994; 2: 115–123.
7.
Amadio PC, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, Scleck CD, Jensen LM. Outcome after colles fracture – the relative responsiveness of three questionnaires and physical examination measures. J Hand Surg1996; 21A: 781–787.
8.
Bialocerkowski AE, Grimmer KA, Bain GI. A systematic review of the content and quality for wrist outcome instruments. Int J Qual Health Care2000; 12: 149–157.
9.
Wake”eld AE, McQueen MM. The role of physiotherapy and clinical predictors of outcome after fracture of the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg2000; 82B: 972–976.
10.
World Health Organization. ICIDH-2 Beta-2 draft. 2000. http://www.who.int/icidh/Beta2fullpdf
11.
Penta M, Thonnard J-L, Tesio L. ABILHAND – a rasch-built measure of manual ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79: 1035–1042.
12.
Watts AMI, Greenstock M, Cole RP. Outcome following the rehabilitation of hand trauma patients – the importance of a subjective functional assessment. J Hand Surg1998; 23B: 485–489.
13.
Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndromes. J Bone Joint Surg1993; 75A: 1585–1592.
14.
Katz JN, Gelberman RH, Wright EA, Abrahamsson S, Lew RA. A preliminary scoring system for assessing the outcome or carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg1994; 19A: 531–538.
15.
MacDermid J. Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand Ther1996; 9: 178–183.
16.
van Lankveld W, van’t Pad Bosch P, Bakker J, Terwindt S, Franssen M, van Riel P. Sequential occupational dexterity assessment (SODA) – a new test to measure hand disability. J Hand Ther1996; 9: 27–32.
17.
van den Abbelle KLS, Loh YC, Stanley JK, Trail IA. Early results of a modi”ed Brunelli procedure for scapholunate instability. J Hand Surg1998; 23B: 258–261.
18.
Wintman BI, Gelberman RH, Katz JN. Dynamic scapholunate instability – results of operative treatment with distal capsulodesis. J Hand Surg1995; 20A: 258–261.
19.
Bickerstaff DR, Bell MJ. Carpal malalignment in colles’ fractures. J Hand Surg1989; 14B: 155–160.
Green DP, O’Brien ET. Open reduction of carpal dislocations – indications and operative techniques. J Hand Surg1978; 3A: 250–265.
22.
Carrol D. A quantitative test of upper extremity function. J Chronic Dis1965; 18: 479–491.
23.
Colditz JC. Functional fracture bracing. In: Hunter JM, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD eds. Rehabilitation of the hand – surgery and therapy, fourth edition.St Louis: Mosby, 1995: 395–408.
24.
Jetter E, Degnan GG, Lichtman DM. Conservative rehabilitation. In: Lichtman DM, Alexander AH eds. The wrist and its disorders, second edition.Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997: 699–708.
25.
Schutt AH. Wrist rehabilitation and splinting – occupational therapy. In: Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH eds. The wrist – diagnosis and operative treatment, Volume 2. St Louis: Mosby, 1998: 1272–1286.
26.
Ritchie JE. Using qualitative research to enhance the evidence-base practice of health care providers. Aust J Physiother1999; 45: 251–256.
27.
Pransky G, Feuerstein M, Himmelstein J, Katz JN, Vickers-Lahti M. Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders – development and validation of the upper extremity functional scale. J Occup Environ Med1997; 39: 1195–1202.
28.
Slevin E, Sines D. Enhancing the truthfulness consistency and transferability of a qualitative study – utilising a manifold of approaches. Nurse Res1999/2000; 7: 79–97.
29.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Introduction: entering the ”eld of qualitative research. In: Denzin HK and Lincoln YS eds. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. London: SAGE Publications, 1998: 1–34.
30.
Judd CM, Smith ER, Kidder LH. Questionnaires and interviews: asking questions effectively. In: Judd CM, Smith ER, Kidder LH eds. Research methods in social relations. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanvich College Publishers, 1991: 228–266.
31.
Ragin CC. Using qualitative methods to study commonalities. In: Ragin CC ed. Constructing social research. London: Pine Forge Press, 1994: 81–104.
32.
Appleton JV. Analysing qualitative interview data – addressing issues of validity and reliability. J Adv Nurs1995; 22: 993–997.
33.
Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire – major properties and scoring methods. Pain1975; 1: 277–299.
34.
Sommer B, Sommer R. Interview. In: Sommer B, Sommer R eds. A practical guide to behavioural research – tools and techniques, fourth edition.New York: Oxford University Press, 1997: 105–126.
35.
Kapandji IA. The upper limb as logistical support for the hand. In: Tubiana R ed. The hand, Volume 1. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1985: 94–106.
36.
Norkin CC, Levangie PK. The wrist and hand complex. In: Norkin CC, Levangie PK eds. Joint structure and function – a comprehensive analysis. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1984: 213–254.
37.
Webber ER. Physiologic bases for wrist function. In: Lichtman DM, Alexander AH eds. The wrist and its disorders, second edition.Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997: 48–54.
38.
Kane RL. Looking for physical therapy outcomes. Phys Ther1994; 74: 425–429.
39.
Liebenson C, Yeomans S. Outcomes assessment in musculoskeletal medicine. Manual Ther1997; 2: 67-67.
40.
Stewart KM. Therapist’s management to the complex injury. In: Hunter JM, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD eds. Rehabilitation of the hand – surgery and therapy, fourth edition.St Louis: Mosby, 1995: 1057–1074.
41.
O’Connor D, Reynolds K, Krishnan J, Hearn T. Effect of wrist immobilisation on shoulder motion. In: 23rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hand Therapists Conference Proceedings. Washington State Convention and Trade Center, Seattle, Washington, 5–8 October, 2000: 145-145.
