Objective: To investigate whether electrical stimulation is effective in improving quadriceps strength in healthy subjects and to compare interferential and low-frequency current in terms of the effects on quadriceps strength and perceived discomfort.
Design: Randomized, controlled study.
Setting: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department in a university hospital.
Subjects: Thirty medical faculty students, divided into three groups, participated in the study.
Interventions: Group A received electrical stimulation with bipolar interferential current while group B received electrical stimulation with lowfrequency current (symmetrical biphasic). Group C served as the control group. Electrical stimulation was given for 15 minutes, ”ve days a week for three weeks, at a maximally tolerated intensity with the knee fully extended in the sitting position.
Main outcome measures: Before and after the study, quadriceps strength was measured with a Cybex dynamometer isokinetically at the angular velocities of 60°/s and 120°/s. The perceived discomfort experienced with each type of electrical stimulation was quantified by the use of a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: Statistically significant increase in isokinetic strength was observed after training in group A and group B. Increase in strength did not differ between the stimulation groups. No significant change in strength occurred in group C. Perceived discomfort by the stimulation groups was not significantly different.
Conclusion: Both interferential and low-frequency currents can be used in strength training with the parameters used in this study.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baker LL.Clinical uses of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. In: Nelson RM, Currier DP eds. Clinical electrotherapy. Norwalk: Appleton and Lange, 1991: 143–170.
2.
Callaghan MJ, Oldham JA.A critical review of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscles. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med1997; 9: 301–314.
3.
Laughman RK, Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Chao EYS.Strength changes in the normal quadriceps femoris muscle as a result of electrical stimulation. Phys Ther1983; 63: 494–499.
4.
Kramer KF, Semple JE.Comparison of selected strengthening techniques for normal quadriceps. Physiother Can1983; 35: 300–304.
5.
Selkowitz DM.Improvement in isometric strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle after training with electrical stimulation. Phys Ther1985; 65: 186–196.
6.
Stefanovska A, Vodovnik L.Change in muscle force following electrical stimulation. Dependence on stimulation waveform and frequency. Scand J Rehabil Med1985; 17: 141–146.
7.
Soo CL, Curier DP, Threlkeld AJ.Augmenting voluntary torque of healthy muscle by optimization of electrical stimulation. Phys Ther1988; 68: 333–337.
8.
Eriksson E, Haggmark T, Kiessling KH, Karlsson J.Effect of electrical stimulation on human skeletal muscle. Int J Sports Med1981; 2: 18–22.
9.
Romero JA, Sanford TL, Schroeder RV, Fahey TD.The effects of electrical stimulation of normal quadriceps on strength and girth. Med Sci Sports Exerc1982; 14: 194–197.
10.
Fahey TD, Harvey M, Schroeder RV, Ferguson F.In‘ uence of sex differences and knee joint position on electical stimulation-modulated strength increases. Med Sci Sports Exerc1985; 17: 144–147.
11.
Halbach JW, Straus D.Comparison of electromyostimulation to isokinetic training in increasing power of the knee extensor mechanism. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1980; 2: 20–24.
12.
Balogun JA, Onilari OO, Akeju OA, Marzouk DK.High voltage electrical stimulation in the augmentation of muscle strength: effects of pulse frequency. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 910–916.
13.
Mohr T, Carlson B, Sulentic C, Landry R.Comparison of isometric exercise and high volt galvanic stimulation on quadriceps femoris muscle strength. Phys Ther1985; 65: 606–609.
14.
Currier DP, Mann R.Muscular strength development by electical stimulation in healthy individuals. Phys Ther1983; 63: 915–921.
15.
Delitto A, Rose JS.Comparative comfort of three waveforms used in electrically eliciting quadriceps femoris muscle contractions. Phys Ther1986; 66: 1704–1707.
16.
Grimby G, Wigerstad-Lossing I.Comparison of high and low-frequency muscle stimulators. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1989; 70: 835–838.
17.
Gubler B, Hildebrandt M.Interference versus low frequency. A comparison of 2 methods of electric muscle stimulation. Schweiz Z Sportmed1993; 41: 15–19.
