Objective: To determine problems associated with electric-powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs) and the benefits perceived by their users.
Design: Hospital-based cohort study of all patients referred over a 19-month period.
Setting: Regional Wheelchair Service for North West London serving nine district wheelchair services.
Subjects: Of the 174 subjects referred, 10 withdrew their application or were found to be unsuitable at screening, 164 were assessed and 124 were prescribed chairs. One hundred and thirteen subjects were interviewed by telephone four months after provision of the chair.
Main measures: Demographic and diagnostic data; current chair usage; self-reported accidents and component faults were compared with those recorded in the unit records; new activities embarked on since delivery; and benefits reported for main carers.
Results: Seventeen ‘mishaps’ were reported by 15 users including tipping from chairs (6) and falls during transfers (3). Three probably reflected mechanical failure. Component failure was found in 39% of EPIOCs, mostly affecting control boxes (22), frames (10) and footrests (10). New activities were undertaken by 56 (50%) users, usually shopping and visits to friends/family. Eighty-five per cent of users felt that the chairs made life easier for their informal carers through increased independence, reducing transfers and reduced need for ‘pushing’.
Conclusions: The component failures and self-reported accidents (some potentially dangerous) have implications for the NHS, manufacturers, prescribers and users. EPIOCs enhance the independence of severely physically disabled individuals in the community and assist carers by lessening dependence and enhancing social interaction. This study demonstrated the need for follow-up of EPIOC users and chairs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
McClement E. Prescription for independence. A working party report of the BSRM Environmental Control Special Interest Group, British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1994; 1–32.
2.
Cooper R. Technology for disabilities. BMJ1999; 319: 1290-1290.
3.
Shinkwin K, Russell J. The guidelines: theory and practice. A review of the first year of the EPIOC funding scheme. London: Muscular Dystrophy Group, 1997; 1–9.
4.
Aldersea P, Ham R, White E. Provision of electrically powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs. Br J Ther Rehabil1999; 6: 192–198.
5.
Hunter J, Muir K. Measuring the benefits of NHS Indoor/Outdoor Powerchair provision. News Br Soc Rehabil Med1998; 10(abstract).
6.
Dyson A, Field S. Electrically powered indoor/ outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): users views. Brighton: South Downs Health NHS Trust, 1999; 1–23.
7.
Kirby R, Ackroyd-Stolarz S. Wheelchair safety – adverse reports to the United States Food and Drug Administration. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1995; 74: 308–312.
8.
Gaal R, Rebholtz N, Hotchkiss R, Pfaelzer P. Wheelchair rider injuries: causes and consequences for wheelchair design and selection. J Rehabil Res Dev1997; 34: 58–71.
9.
Calder C, Kirby R. Fatal wheelchair-related accidents in the United States. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1990; 69: 184–190.
10.
Cooper R. Engineering manual and electric powered wheelchairs. Crit Rev Biomed Eng1999; 27: 27–73.
11.
Bray C, Dale R. Adverse incident reports 1998. Wetherby: Medical Devices Agency, 1999: 1–52.
12.
Cowan D, Turner-Smith A. The funding agencies perspective on provision of electronic assistive technology: equipping for life?Br J Occup Ther1999; 62: 75–79.
13.
Cowan D, Turner-Smith A. The user's perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: equipped for life?Br J Occup Ther1999; 62: 2–6.
14.
Kirby R, Coughlan S, Christie M. Could changes in wheelchair delivery system improve safety?Can Med Assoc J1995; 153: 1585–1591.
15.
British Standards Institution. Wheelchairs – Part 14: Power and control systems for electric wheelchairs – requirements and test methods. International Standard1997; ISO 7176-14: 1–34.
16.
McLaurin C, Axelson P. Wheelchair standards: an overview. J Rehabil Res Dev1990; Clin Suppl 2: 100–103.
17.
Aldersea P. Feedback Forum: Standards. BSI ISO 7176-15. Technical jargon or useful information. PMG Newsletter1997; 6: 10–11.
18.
McCreadie M, James R. An audit of wheelchair service provision in three regions. Br J Ther Rehabil1995; 2: 465–472.
19.
Ward J, Hall M, Frank A, Orwell N, Belcher M, McCullagh C. The set-up and audit of a regional EPIOC service. Posture Mobility1999; 9: 5–11.
20.
Cooper E, Fyfe N. The provision of powered wheelchairs: one year on. Br J Ther Rehabil1998; 5: 280–281.
21.
Fenwick D. Wheelchairs and their users: a survey among users of National Health Service wheelchairs in England and Wales, to establish their characteristics and attitudes to their wheelchairs and to the operation of the wheelchair service. London: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, HMSO, 1977: 1–78.
22.
Smith C, McCreadie M, Unsworth J. Prescribing wheelchairs: the opinions of wheelchair users and their carers. Clin Rehabil1995; 9: 74–80.
