Objective: To compare two different home exercise programmes for patients with acute whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). A further aim was to describe the initial prognostic variables related to self-reported pain at six months follow-up.
Design: A randomized treatment study with a follow-up period of six months.
Settings: The study was undertaken in an orthopaedic clinic at a university hospital.
Subjects: A total of 59 symptomatic (neck pain, stiffness, etc.) patients with acute whiplash injury.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to a regular treatment group (RT group) and an additional-exercise treatment group (AT group).
Main outcome measures: Pain Disability Index (PDI), Self-Efficacy Scale (SES), Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), neck range of motion (ROM), head posture, kinaesthetic sensibility, visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: Patients given an additional exercise did not improve more than patients with regular treatment. Only one CSQ item, ‘Ability to decrease pain', showed a significant difference between the groups in its pattern of change over time: the AT group had a significant increase between three and six months whilst values in the RT group decreased. Nonsymptomatic patients at six months follow-up were characterized by initially better self-efficacy, lower disability and significantly different patterns in the use of ‘behavioural coping strategies' when compared with symptomatic patients. The nonsymptomatic patients also reported more frequent training than symptomatic patients, i.e. they complied better with the treatment regime.
Conclusion: This home exercise programme, including training of neck and shoulder ROM, relaxation and general advice seems to be sufficient treatment for acute WAD patients when used on a daily basis. Additionally, patients reporting low self-efficacy and high disability levels may profit from more attention initially, as these psychological factors are significant predictors of pain at long-term follow-up.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Borchgrevink G, Kaasa A, McDonagh D, Stiles T, Haraldseth O, Lereim I. Acute treatment of whiplash neck sprain injuries. Spine1998; 23: 25–31.
2.
McKinney L. Early mobilisation and outcome in acute sprains of the neck. BMJ1989; 299: 1006–1008.
3.
McKinney L, Dornan J, Ryan M. The role of physiotherapy in the management of acute neck sprains following road-traffic accidents. Arch Emerg Med1989; 6: 27–33.
4.
Mealy K, Brennan H, Fenelon G. Early mobilisation of acute whiplash injuries. BMJ1986; 292: 656–657.
5.
Gennis P, Miller L, Gallagher J, Giglio J, Carter W, Nathanson N. The effect of soft cervical collars on persistent neck pain in patients with whiplash injury. Acad Emerg Med1996; 3: 568–573.
6.
Pennie B, Agambar L. Whiplash injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am1990; 72-B: 277–279.
7.
Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on whiplash-sassociated disorders: redefining ‘whiplash' and its management. Spine1995; 20: 7–73.
8.
Heikkilä H, Åström P-G. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with whiplash injury. Scand J Rehabil Med1996; 28: 133–138.
9.
Loudon J, Ruhl M, Field E. Ability to reproduce head position after whiplash injury. Spine1997; 22: 865–868.
10.
Janda W. Muscles and motor control in cervicogenic disorders: assessment and management care. In: Grant R ed. Physical therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1994: 195–216.
11.
Wall P. On the relation of injury to pain: the John J. Bonica Lecture. Pain1979; 6: 253–264.
12.
Radanov P, Di Stefano G, Schindrig A, Ballinari P. Role of psychosocial stress in recovery from common whiplash. Lancet1991; 388: 712–715.
13.
Gargan M, Bannister G, Main C, Hollis S. The behavioural response to whiplash injury. J Bone Joint Surg (Br)1997; 79-B: 523–526.
14.
Holmes J, Stevenson C. Differential effects of avoidant and attentional coping strategies on adaption to chronic and recent-onset pain. Health Psychol1990; 9: 577–584.
15.
Jensen M, Turner J, Romano J, Karoly P. Coping with chronic pain: a critical review of the literature. Pain 1991; 47: 249–283.
16.
Söderlund A, Lindberg P. Long-term functional and psychosocial problems in whiplash associated disorders. Int J Rehabil Res1999; 22: 77–84.
17.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol1982; 37: 122–147.
18.
Dolce J, Doleys D, Raczynski J, Lossie J, Poole L, Smith M. The role of self-efficacy expectancies in the prediction of pain tolerance. Pain1986; 27: 261–272.
19.
Anderson K, Dowds B, Pelletz R, Edwards T, Peeters-Asdourian C. Development and initial validation of a scale to measure self-efficacy beliefs in patients with chronic pain. Pain1995; 63: 77–84.
20.
Dolce J, Crocker M, Moletteire C, Doleys D. Exercise quotas, anticipatory concern and self-efficacy expectancies in chronic pain: a preliminary report. Pain1986; 24: 365–372.
21.
Dolce J, Crocker M, Doleys D. Prediction of outcome among chronic pain patients. Behav Res Ther1986; 24: 313–319.
22.
Kores R, Murphy W, Rosenthal T, Elias D, North W. Predicting outcome of chronic pain treatment via a modified self-efficacy scale. Behav Res Ther1990; 28: 165–169.
23.
Pollard A. Preliminary validity study of the Pain Disability Index. Percept Mot Skills1984; 59: 974-974.
24.
Jerome A, Gross R. Pain disability index: construct and discriminant validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1991; 72: 920–922.
25.
Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, Duckro PN, Krause ST. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1987; 68: 438–441.
26.
Altmaier E, Russell D, Feng Kao C, Lehmann T, Weinstein J. Role of self-efficacy in rehabilitation outcome among chronic low back pain patients. J Counsel Psychol1993; 40: 335–339.
27.
Jensen I, Linton S. Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ): reliability of the Swedish version of the CSQ. Scand J Behav Ther1993; 22: 139–145.
28.
Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain1983; 17: 33–44.
29.
Lawson K, Reesor K, Keefe F, Turner J. Dimensions of pain-related cognitive coping: cross-validation of the factor structure of the Coping Strategy Questionnaire. Pain1990; 43: 195–204.
30.
Hyppönen H. Kulmamittarin käyttö pään asennon mittamiseen (The use of a goniometre in measuring head posture). Master thesis, Helsinki, Finland, 1992.
31.
Engh L, Fall M, Hennig M, Söderlund A. Mätning av huvudets hållning i förhållande till axlarna; En intra-och interbedömarreliabilitetsstudie (Measurement of head posture; Intra-and intercorrelation). Department of Neurosciences, Physiotherapy programme, University of Uppsala, Sweden, 1998.
32.
Revel M, Andre-Deshays C, Minguet M. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with cervical pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1991; 72: 288–291.
33.
Glass G, McGaw B, Smith M. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981.
34.
Estlander A-M, Vanharanta H, Moneta G, Kaivanto K. Anthropometric variables, self-efficacy beliefs, and pain and disability ratings on the isokinetic performance of low back pain patients. Spine1994; 19: 941–947.
35.
Grönblad M, Järvinen E, Hurri H, Hupli M, Karaharju E. Relationship of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) with three dynamic physical tests in a group of patients with chronic low-back and leg pain. Clin J Pain1994; 10: 197–203.
36.
Weiser S, Cedraschi C. Psychosocial issues in the prevention of chronic low back pain – a literature review. Baillières Clin Rheumatol1992; 6: 657–684.
37.
Katz J, Ritvo P, Irvine J, Jackson M. Coping with chronic pain. In: Zeidner M, Endler N eds. Handbook of coping. New York: John Wiley, 1996: 252–278.
38.
Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N. Whiplash injury. Pain1994; 58: 283–307.
39.
Karlsborg M, Smed A, Jespersen H et al. A prospective study of 39 patients with whiplash injury. Acta Neurol Scand1997; 95: 65–72.
40.
Mayou R, Tyndel S, Bryant B. Long-term outcome of motor vehicle accident injury. Psychosom Med1997; 59: 578–584.
