Abstract
Data collection: Reliability was assessed for two alternative upper limb postures (arm straight or bent) and data were collected on two days, twice at each session, to determine the repeatability between and within recording sessions.
Data analysis: The data were split into segments and subjected to autoregressive (AR) modelling. Three parameters (one for each of the measurement directions examined) were extracted from the models and used as variables for the reliability analysis.
Statistical tests: Variation within and between sessions was assessed by finding the median differences between efforts and days for each subject and then finding the overall median value and the corresponding 97.9% confidence intervals for each movement. This produced estimates of the population median value and indicated the precision of the estimates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
