Objective and design: A systematic literature review to compare mobility scales used for lower limb amputees. A literature search was carried out by computerized search of biomedical literature including Medline and Embase. The studies included were published between 1978 and 1998 and including the following keywords: amputation, artificial limbs, prosthesis, lower limb, activities of daily living, mobility.
Results: Thirty-five studies were identified; 19 had a measurement of separate levels of mobility comparable to each other. Sixteen studies used ordinal and ratio scales without separate levels of mobility. The widest range of measurement found was the scale from ‘walking with prosthesis without a walking aid’ to ‘totally confined to bed’. The Stanmore Harold Wood mobility scale was published most frequently. None of the 35 studies presented give a continuous measurement of mobility.
Conclusion: A multitude of measurement scales and questionnaires are available for differ in methods and measuring range. Measuring mobility by a scale has been shown to have limitations. Several authors did extensive research but they all measure only a number of aspects of mobility. Consensus about the measurement of mobility of lower limb amputees is not available in the recent literature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Houtum van WH, Lavery LA. Regional variation in the incidence of diabetes-related amputations in the Netherlands. Diabetes Res Clin Pract1996; 31: 125–132.
2.
Rommers GM, Vos LDW, Groothoff JW, Schuiling CH, Eisma WH. Epidemiology of lower limb amputees in the north of the Netherlands: aetiology, discharge destination and prosthetic use. Prosthet Orthot Int1997; 21: 92–99.
3.
Collin C, Collin J. Mobility after lower limb amputation. Br J Surg1995; 82: 1010–1011.
4.
Ebskov B, Ebskov L. Epidemiology. In: Murdoch G, Bennett Wilson Jr. eds. Amputation: surgical practice and patient management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996: 23–29.
5.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md Med J1965; 14: 61–65.
6.
Volpicelli LJ, Chambers RB, Wagner Jr, FW. Ambulation levels of bilateral lower-extremity amputees. J Bone Joint Surg1983; 65A: 599–605.
7.
Narang IC, Mathur BP, Singh P, Jape VS. Functional capabilities of lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int1984; 8: 43–51.
8.
Helm P, Engel T, Holm A, Kristiansen VB, Rosendahl S. Function after lower limb amputation. Acta Orthop Scand1986; 57: 154–157.
9.
Kullmann L. Evaluation of disability and of results of rehabilitation with the use of the Barthel index and Russek's classification. Int Disabil Stud1987; 9: 68–71.
10.
Russek AS. Management of lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1961; 42: 687–703.
11.
Stern PH. Occlusive vascular disease of lower limbs: diagnosis, amputation surgery and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1988; 67: 145–154.
12.
Pinzur MS, Smith DG, Daluga DJ, Osterman H. Selection of patients for through knee amputation. J Bone Joint Surg1988; 70A: 746–750.
13.
Wolf E, Lilling M, Ferber I, Marcus J. Prosthetic rehabilitation of elderly bilateral amputees. Int J Rehabil Res1989; 12: 271–278.
14.
Siriwardena GJA, Bertrand PV. Factors influencing rehabilitation of artheriosclerotic lower limb amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev1991; 28: 35–44.
15.
Poljolainen T, Alaranta H. Predictive factors of functional ability after lower limb amputation. Ann Chir Gynaec1991; 80: 36–39.
16.
Hanspal RS, Fisher K. Assessment of cognitive and psychomotor function and rehabilitation of elderly people with prostheses. BMJ1991; 302: 940-940.
17.
Hepp W, de Jonge K, Palenker J. Rehabilitationsergebnisse des amputierten GefäBpatiënten. Orthopaedietechnik1991; 8: 566–570.
18.
Houghton AD, Taylor PR, Thurlow S, Rootes E, McColl I. Success rates for rehabilitation of vascular amputees: implications for preoperative assessment and amputation level. Br J Surg1992; 79: 753–755.
19.
Datta D, Nair PN, Payne J. Outcome of prosthetic management of bilateral lower limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil1992; 14: 98–102.
20.
Zijp EM, Rasenberg EMC, van den Bosch JSG. Reactivering in een verpleeghuis bij patienten met een beenamputatie. Tijds Gerontol Geriatr1992; 23: 54–59.
21.
Lachmann SM. The mobility outcome for amputees with rheumatoid arthritis is poor. Br J Rheumatol1993; 32: 1083–1088.
22.
Campbell WB, Johnston JA St, Kernick VFM, Rutter EA. Lower limb amputation: striking the balance. Ann R Coll Surg Engl1994; 76: 205–209.
23.
Johnson VJ, Kondziela S, Gottschalk F. Pre and post-amputation mobility of trans-tibial amputees: correlation to medical problems, age and mortality. Prosthet Orthot Int1995; 19: 159–154.
24.
Kanellopoulos G, Sabaharwal A, MacGregor C, Cooper GG, Engeset J. Major lower limb amputation for vascular disease in the Grampian area: the outcome of rehabilitation. J R Coll Surg Edinburgh1996; 41: 114–115.
25.
Burger H, Marincek C, Isakov E. Mobility of persons after traumatic lower limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil1997; 19: 272–277.
26.
Kegel B, Carpenter ML, Burgess EM. Functional capabilities of lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1978; 59: 109–120.
27.
Day HJB. The assessment and description of amputee activity. Prosthet Orthot Int1981; 5: 23–28.
28.
Steinberg FU, Sunwoo I, Roettger RF. Prosthetic rehabilitation of geriatric amputee patients: a follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1985; 66: 742–745.
29.
Beekman CE, Axtell LA. Prosthetic use in elderly patients with dysvascular above-knee and through-knee amputations. Phys Ther1987; 67: 1510–1516.
30.
Lavan J. Rehabilitation of the elderly amputee. Irish Med J1991; 84: 91–93.
31.
Chan KM, Tan ES. Use of lower limb prosthesis among elderly amputees. Ann Acad Med Singapore1990; 6: 811–816.
32.
Brodzka WK, Thornhill HL. Long term function of persons with atherosclerotic bilateral below knee amputation living in the inner city. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1990; 71: 895–900.
33.
Collin C, Wade DT, Cochrane GM. Functional outcome of lower limb amputees with peripheral vascular disease. Clin Rehabil1992; 6: 13–21.
34.
Hagberg E, Berlin ÖK, Renström P. Function after through-knee compared with below-knee and above knee amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int1992; 16: 168–173.
35.
Nissen SJ, Newman WP. Factors influencing reintegration to normal living after amputation. Arch Phys Rehabil Med1992; 73: 548–551.
36.
Walker CRC, Ingham RR, Hullin MG, McCreath SW. Lower limb amputation following injury: a survey of long-term functional outcome. Injury1994; 25: 387–392.
37.
Gauthier-Gaganon C, Grisé M-C. Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75: 1309–1314.
38.
Sapp L, Little CE. Functional outcomes in a lower limb amputee population. Prosthet Orthot Int1995; 19: 92–96.
39.
Datta D, Ariyaratnam R, Hilton S. Timed walking test – an all-embracing outcome measure for lower limb amputees?Clin Rehabil1996; 10: 227–232.
40.
Legro MW, Reiber GD, Smith DG, Del Aguila M, Larsen J, Boone D. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79: 931–938.
41.
Traballesi M, Brunelli S, Pratesi L, Pulcini M, Angioni C, Paolucci S. Prognostic factors in rehabilitation of above knee amputees for vascular diseases. Disabil Rehabil1998; 20: 380–384.
42.
Murdoch G, Jacobs NA, Wilson Jr, AB. Report of ISPO consensus conference on amputation surgery. University of Strathclyde, ISPO, Denmark, 1992.
43.
Bowling A. Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1995.
44.
Holden JM, Fernie GR. Extent of artificial limb use following rehabilitation. J Orthop Res1987; 5: 562–568.
45.
Stam HJ, Eijskoot F, Bussmann JBJ. A device for long term ambulatory monitoring in transtibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int1995; 19: 53–55.
46.
Bussman JBJ, Stam HJ. Validity and reliability of an instrument for long-term ambulatory measurement of mobility activities. Proceedings of the 5th European Congress on Research in Rehabilitation, 28 May–1 June 1995, Helsinki, Finland. J Rehabil Sci1995; 8: 65-65.
47.
Kochersberger G, McConnell E, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper C. The reliability, validity, and stability of a measure of physical activity in the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996; 77: 793–795.
48.
Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud1991; 13: 50–54.
