Objective: To determine whether systematic progressive high-intensity quadriceps training increases leg extensor power and reduces disability in patients rehabilitating after proximal femoral fracture.
Design: Open parallel group randomized controlled trial comparing the addition of six weeks quadriceps training (40 patients) with standard physiotherapy alone (40 patients). The training group exercised twice weekly, with six sets of 12 repetitions of knee extension (both legs), progressing up to 80% of their one-repetition maximum.
Setting: Orthogeriatric unit, and community follow-up.
Subjects: Eighty patients rehabilitating after proximal femoral fracture.
Main outcome measures: Measurements of leg extensor power (Nottingham Power Rig), functional mobility (elderly mobility score), disability (Barthel Index) and quality of life (Nottingham Health Profile) were made at baseline, after six weeks (at the end of the intervention) and at 16 weeks.
Results: Leg extensor power increased significantly in the quadriceps training group (fractured leg mean improvement at six weeks 157% (standard error 16), nonfractured leg 80% (12)) compared with the control group (63% (11) and 26% (8) respectively, unpaired Student's t-test p = 0.007 and p = 0.01 for between-group comparisons). Significant benefits were maintained at 16 weeks. Quadriceps training resulted in a greater increase in elderly mobility scale score compared with standard rehabilitation (between-group difference of 2.5 (95% CI 1.1,3.8) at week 6 and 1.9 (0.4,3.4) at week 16). Barthel score increased significantly from week 0 to 6 in the quadriceps training group compared with controls (Mann–Whitney U-test p = 0.05). Patients in the quadriceps training group scored significantly better in the energy subscore of the Nottingham Health Profile at the end of follow-up (Mann–Whitney U-test p = 0.0185).
Conclusions: Progressive high-intensity quadriceps training in elderly proximal femoral fracture patients increased leg extensor power and reduced disability. This was accompanied by an increase in energy as measured by the Nottingham Health Profile. This intervention may provide a simple practical way of improving outcome in these patients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Keene GS, Parker MJ, Pryor GA. Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. BMJ1993; 307: 1248–1260.
2.
Anianson A, Zetterberg C, Hedberg M, Hendriksson KG. Impaired muscle function with ageing: a background factor in the incidence of proximal femoral fracture. Clin Orthop1984; 191: 193–202.
3.
Bassey EJ, Fiatarone MA, O'Neill EF, Kelly M, Evans WJ, Lipsitz LA. Leg extensor power and functional performance in very old men and women. Clin Sci1992; 82: 321–327.
4.
Lamb SC, Morse RE, Grimley Evans J. Mobility after proximal femoral fracture: the relevance of leg extensor power, postural sway and other factors. Age Ageing1995; 24: 308–314.
5.
Tinetti ME, Baker DI, Gottschalk M et al. Home-based multicomponent rehabilitation programme for older persons after hip fracture: a randomised trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 916–922.
6.
Craik RL. Disability following hip fracture. Phys Ther1994; 74: 387–388.
7.
Fiatarone MA, O'Neill EF, Ryan ND et al. Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people. N Engl J Med1994; 330: 1796–1775.
8.
Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for the assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing1972; 1: 233–238.
9.
Fiatarone MA, Marks EC, Ryan ND, Meredity CN, Lipsitz LA, Evans WJ. High intensity strength training in nonagenarians. Effects on skeletal muscle. JAMA1990; 263: 3029–3034.
10.
Bassey EJ, Short AH. A new method for measuring power output in a single leg extension – feasibility, reliability and validity. Eur J Appl Physiol1990; 60: 385–390.
11.
Bassey EJ, Harries EL. Normal values for handgrip strength in 920 men and women aged over 65 years, and longitudinal changes over 4 years in 620 survivors. Clin Sci1993; 84: 331–337.
12.
Smith R. Validation and reliability of the elderly mobility scale. Physiotherapy1994; 80: 744–747.
13.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed up and go! A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc1991; 39: 142–148.
14.
Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional Reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol1990; 45: 192–197.
15.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J1965; 14: 61–65.
16.
Ebrahim OS, Barer D, Nouri F. Use of Nottingham health profile with patients after a stroke. J Epidemiol Commun Health1986; 40: 166–169.
17.
Campbell MJ, Julious SA, Altman DG. Estimating sample sizes for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons. BMJ1995; 311: 1145-1145.
18.
Duncan PW, Studenski S, Chandler J, Prescott B. Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans. J Gerontol1992; 47: M93–M98.
19.
Cameron I, Finnegan T, Madhok R, Langhorne P, Handoll H. Co-ordinated multidisciplinary approaches for inpatient rehabilitation of older patients with proximal femoral fractures. The Cochrane Library1999; 1–14.
