Objective: To compare the feasibility and efficacy of a programme combining imagery and occupational therapy with a programme of therapy only.
Design: Randomized, controlled case series.
Setting: Subacute outpatient clinic.
Subjects: Thirteen consecutively admitted patients between four weeks and one year post stroke exhibiting stable motor deficits in their affected upper limbs.
Intervention: All patients received an hour of therapy three times a week for six weeks administered by the same physical and occupational therapists. During the same period, eight patients participated in 10-minute guided imagery sessions after each therapy session, as well as practising imagery at home twice each week. Five patients participated in a control intervention consisting of exposure to stroke information.
Main outcome measures: The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery (Fugl-Meyer) and Action Research Arm Test (ARA).
Results: After intervention, Fugl-Meyer and ARA scores of patients in the therapy only group remained virtually the same; therapy plus imagery group scores improved by 13.8 and 16.4 points, respectively, on the Fugl-Meyer and ARA.
Conclusions: Imagery is a clinically feasible, cost-effective complement to therapy that may improve outcomes more than participation in therapy only.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Heart Association. 1997 stroke facts. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1997.
2.
Carr J, Shephard R. Neurological rehabilitation: optimizing motor performance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998.
3.
Trombley CA. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction, fourth edition. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1995.
4.
O'Sullivan SB. Stroke. In: O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz, TJ eds. Physical rehabilitation: assessment and treatment. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, 1994: 327–360.
5.
Ottenbacher K. Cerebrovascular accident: Some characteristics of occupational therapy evaluation forms. Am J Occup Ther1980; 34: 268–271.
6.
Fansler CL, Poff CL, Shephard KF. Effects of mental practice on balance in elderly women. Phys Ther1985; 65(9): 1332–1337.
7.
Fairweather MM, Sidaway B. Ideokinematic imagery as a postural development technique. Res Q Exerc Sport1993; 64: 385–392.
8.
Linden CA, Uhley JE, Smith D et al. The effects of mental practice on walking balance in an elderly population. Occup Ther J Res1989; 9: 155–169.
9.
Schmidt RA. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1988.
10.
Sabari JS. Motor learning concepts applied to activity-based intervention with adults with hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther1991; 45(6): 523–530.
11.
Decety J, Michel F. Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks. Brain Cogn1989; 11(1): 87–97.
12.
Ito M. Movement and thought: identical control mechanisms by the cerebellum. Trends Neurosci1993; 16(11): 453–454.
13.
Kohl RM, Roenker DL. Behavioral evidence for shared mechanisms between actual and imaged motor responses. J Hum Mov Stud1989; 172: 173–186.
14.
Magill RA. Motor learning: concepts and applications, fifth edition. Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark, 1998.
15.
Bakker FC, Boschker M, Chung J. Changes in muscular activity while imagining weight lifting using stimulus or response propositions. J Sport Exercise Psychol1996; 18(3): 313–324.
16.
Livesay JR, Samaras MR. Covert neuromuscular activity of the dominant forearm during visualization of a motor task. Percept Mot Skills1998; 86(2): 371–374.
17.
Decety J. The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behav Brain Res1996; 77(1–2): 45–52.
18.
Salford E, Ryding E, Rosen I et al. Motor performance and motor ideation of arm movements after stroke: A SPECT rCBF study. Proceedings of the World Confederation of Physical Therapy Congress, 1995, Washington, DC: 793-793.
19.
Roth M, Decety J, Raybaudi, M et al. Possible involvement of primary motor cortex in mentally simulated movement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroreport1996; 17(7): 1280–1284.
20.
Newell A, Rosenbloom PS. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: Anderson, JR ed. Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981: 1–55.
21.
Johnson SH. Imagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics. Neuroreport2000; 11(4): 729–732.
22.
Van Leeuwen R, Inglis JT. Mental practice and imagery: a potential role in stroke rehabilitation. Phys Ther Rev1998; 3: 47–52.
23.
Page SJ. Imagery improves motor function in chronic stroke patients with hemiplegia: a pilot study. Occup Ther J Res2000; 20(3): 200–215.
24.
Teng E, Chui HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State Exam. J Clin Psychiatr1987; 48(8): 314–318.
25.
Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther1987; 67: 206–207.
26.
Hall EG, Pongrac J. Movement imagery questionnaire. London, ON: University of Western Ontario, 1983.
27.
Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The poststroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med1975; 7: 13–31.
28.
Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia: a neurophysiological approach. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
29.
Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther1983; 63: 1606–1610.
30.
DiFabio RP, Badke RB. Relationship of sensory organization to balance function in patients with hemiplegia. Phys Ther1990; 70(9): 542–548.
31.
Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res1981; 4: 483–492.
32.
DeWeerdt WJG, Harrison MA. Measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients: a comparison of the Brunnstrom-Fugl-Meyer test and the action research arm test. Physiother Can1985; 37(2): 65–70.
33.
Logigan M, Samuels M, Falconer J. Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1983; 64: 364-364.
34.
Lord J, Hall K. Neuromuscular reeducation versus traditional programs for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1986; 67: 88-88.
35.
Paivio A. Cognitive and motivational functions of imagery in human performance. J Appl Sport Sci1985; 10(4): 22–28.
36.
Chen CL, Tang FT, Chen HC, Chung CY, Wong MK. Brain lesion size and location: effects on motor recovery and functional outcome in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000; 81(4): 447–452.
