Objective: To test the consistency and validity of the Self-assessment Parkinson's Disease Disability Scale in patients with Parkinson's disease living at home.
Design: Patients with Parkinson's disease responded to a set of questionnaires. In addition, an observation of the performance of daily activities was carried out on a subgroup.
Setting and subjects: Patients with Parkinson's disease living at home (n = 142).
Measures: The Self-assessment Parkinson's Disease Disability Scale (SPDDS), the Hoehn & Yahr Rating Scale (H&Y), and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP68). The observation concerned nine activities that correspond to items of the SPDDS questionnaire.
Results: Internal consistency of the SPDDS was very high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97; reliability rho = 0.97). The items of the SPDDS are hierarchical (Loevinger's H = 0.64): patients had least difficulty with ‘washing’ and ‘brushing teeth’ and most difficulty with ‘turning in bed’, ‘travelling by public transport’ and ‘writing a letter’. Validity of the SPDDS was good: the relationship between the SPDDS questionnaire and the H&Y rating scale, the SIP68 and the results of the observation was strong and significant.
Conclusion: The SPDDS is a unidimensional instrument measuring disabilities in Parkinson's disease patients living at home.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Emanuels-Zuurveen ES, Brouwer WH, Lakke JPWF, Bouhuys AL. Lichamelijke symptomen van de ziekte van Parkinson en de score op de Beck's Depression inventory. T Gerontol Geriatr1991; 22: 134–138.
2.
Martinez-martin P, Gil-Nagel A, Morlan Gracia L, Balseiro Gomez J, Martinez-Sarries J, Bermejo F and the Cooperative Multicentric Group. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale characteristics and structure. Mov Disord1994; 1: 76–83.
3.
Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology1967; 17: 427–442.
4.
Canter CJ, de la Torre R, Mier M. A method of evaluating disability in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Nerv Mental Disord1961; 133: 143–147.
5.
Marsden C.D., Schachter M. Assessment of extrapyramidal disorders. Br J Clin Pharmacol1981; 11: 129–151.
6.
Diamond SG, Markham CH. Evaluating the evaluations: or how to weigh the scales of Parkinsonian disability. Neurology1983; 33: 1089–1092.
7.
Peto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Greenhall R. The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson's disease. Qual Life Res1995; 4: 241–248.
8.
Brown RG, Maccarthy B, Gotham AM, Der GJ, Marsden CD. Depression and disability in Parkinson's disease: a follow-up of 132 cases. Psychol Med1988; 18: 49–55.
9.
Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
10.
Brown RG, MacCarthy B, Jahanshahi M, Marsden CD. Accuracy of self-reported disability in patients with Parkinsonism. Arch Neurol1989; 46: 955–959.
11.
Bruin AF de, Buys M, Witte LP de, Diederiks JPM. The Sickness Impact Profile: SIP68, a short generic version. First evaluation of the reliability and reproducibility. J Clin Epidemiol1994; 8: 863–871.
12.
Marcel WM, Post MWM, Bruin A de, Witte L de, Schrijvers G. The SIP68: a measure of health-related functional status in rehabilitation medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996; 77: 440–445.
13.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
14.
Mokken, RJ. A theory and procedure of scale analyses. The Hague: Mouton, 1971.
15.
Molenaar IW, Debets P, Sijtsma K, Hemker BT. User's manual MSP: a program for Mokken Scale Analysis for polytomous items, version 3.0. Groningen: ProGamma, 1994.
16.
Hemker BT, Sijtsma K, Molenaar IW. Selection of unidimensional scales from a multidimensional item bank in the polytomous Mokken IRT Model. Appl Psychol Measurement1995; 337–352.
17.
Hinkel DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences, third edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1994.
18.
Rankin G, Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil1998; 12: 187–199.
19.
Landis RJ, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics1977; 33: 159–174.
20.
Wimmers RH, Kansma YPT. Een enquête naar handelingsproblemen bij patiënten met de ziekte van Parkinson. Ned Tijdschrift Fysiother1998; 3: 54–61.
21.
Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Peto V, Greenhall R, Hyman N. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDG-39): development and validation of a Parkinson's disease summary index score. Age Ageing1997; 26: 353–357.
22.
Montgomery GK, Norman C, Reynolds MD. Compliance, reliability, and validity of self-monitoring for physical disturbances of Parkinson's disease. J Nerv Ment Disord1990; 178: 636–641.
