Objective: To observe the effect of endurance training on novice users of an arm-propelled three-wheeled chair (APTWC), powered by asynchronous arm crank propulsion, in actual locomotive conditions.
Study design: A continuous endurance training programme was administered by instructing subjects to propel themselves at free chosen speed (FCS) for 15 minutes, twice daily. Data were collected at two-week intervals consecutively and this was continued until the maximum beneficial effect was achieved.
Setting: The study was conducted in outdoor settings similar to those the users encountered in their everyday life.
Subjects: Twelve male paraplegics (below T10), age 30.5 ± 8.59 years, weight 41.75 kg (± 5.76) recommended to use the APTWC as an ambulatory device.
Intervention: The propulsion speed (metres per minute), peak heart rate (beats per minute) and oxygen uptake (litres per minute) were measured in consecutive sessions at two-week intervals. Physiological cost index (beats m-1), oxygen consumption (ml kg-1 min-1) and oxygen cost (ml kg-1 m-1) were derived to assess fitness level.
Results: Significant changes were observed in the variables following endurance training for 12 weeks. The propulsion speed increased considerably and the cardiorespiratory parameters were found to be reduced. One-way analysis of variance was done for each parameter separately for seven sets of readings taken to assess the overall change over the study period of 12 weeks. The F-ratios were found to be significant (p < 0.01) in each case, except for body weight and oxygen uptake. The pairwise comparison of the biweekly results of the parameters which showed an overall significant change over the study period revealed that after the first two weeks there was considerable change (p < 0.01) for all the parameters. The trend was upward for speed and downward for the other cardiovascular stress parameters. These trends continued until the 10th week showing significant change, after which the values become stable as was revealed by the statistical tests (p > 0.05). The percentage difference in the mean values from the initial stage (before training) to the 12th week ranged from 10.44% in the case of heart rate to 69.70% in the case of propulsion speed.
Conclusion: Self-ambulation at free chosen speed regularly for 10–12 weeks provides efficiency and improves fitness status required for wheelchairs driven by an asynchronous arm crank propulsion technique and no special exercise programme is required.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Mukherjee G, Samanta A. Evaluation of ambulatory performance of the arm propelled three-wheeled chair using heart rate as control index. Disabil Rehabil2000; 22: 464–470.
2.
Sawka MN, Glaser RM, Wilde SW, von-Luhrte TC. Metabolic and circulatory response to wheelchair and arm crank exercise. J Appl Physiol1980; 49: 784–788.
3.
Smith PA, Glaser RM, Petrofsky JS, Underwood PD, Richard JJ. Arm crank vs hand-rim wheelchair propulsion: metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1983; 64: 249–254.
4.
Sedlock DA, Knowlton RG, Fitzgerald PI. Circulatory and metabolic response of women to arm crank and wheelchair ergometry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1990; 71: 97–100.
5.
Glaser RM, Sawka MN, Young RE, Suryaprasad AG. Applied physiology for wheelchair design. J Appl Physiol1980; 48: 41–44.
6.
Zwiren LD, Bar-Or O. Response to exercise of paraplegics who differ in conditioning level. Med Sci Sports Exerc1975; 7: 94–98.
7.
Astrand PO, Rodhal K. Textbook of work physiology: physiological basis of exercise. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986.
8.
Hildebrandt G, Voigt ED, Bahn D, Berendes D, Kroger J, Energy cost of propelling wheelchair at various speeds: cardiac response and effect on steering accuracy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1970; 51: 131–136.
9.
Engle P, Hilderbrandt G. Long-term spiro-ergometric studies of studies during clinical period of rehabilitation. Paraplegia1973; 11: 105–110.
10.
Oxylog – instruction manual. PK Morgan Ltd, Gillingham, Kent, UK.
11.
MacGregor J. Rehabilitation ambulatory monitoring. Disability, Proceedings of a seminar on rehabilitation of the disabled. London, Macmillan, 1979: 159–172.
12.
Glaser RM, Sawka MN, Durbin RJ, Foley DM, Suryaprasad AG. Exercise program for wheelchair activity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1981; 60: 67–75.
13.
Van der Woude LH, van Croonenborg JJ, Wolf I, Dallmeizer AJ, Hollander AP. Physical work capacity after 7 week of wheelchair training: effect of intensity in able-bodied subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc1999; 31: 331–341.
14.
Pollock ML, Miller HS, Linnerud AC, Laughridge E, Coleman E, Alexander E. Arm pedaling as an endurance training regimen for the disabled. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1974; 55: 418–424.
15.
Dicarlo SE, Supp MD, Taylor HC. Effect of arm ergometry training on physical work capacity of individuals with spinal cord injuries. Phys Ther1983; 63: 1104–1107.
16.
Taylor AW, Mcdonell E, Brassard L. The effects of an arm ergometer training programme on wheelchair subjects. Paraplegia1986; 24: 105–114.
17.
Glaser RM, Sawka MN, Brune MF, Wilde SW. Physiological response to maximal effort wheelchair and arm crank ergometry. J Appl Physiol1980; 48: 1060–1064.
18.
American Heart Association. Committee of exercise: exercise testing and training of apparently healthy individual: a handbook for physicians. New York: American Heart Association, 1972.
19.
Stenberg J, Astrand PO, Ekblom B, Royce J, Stalin B. Hemodynamic response to work with different muscle group, sitting and supine. J Appl Physiol1967; 22: 61–70.
20.
Newsam CJ, Mulroy SJ, Gronley JK, Bontrager EL, Perry J. Temporal spatial characteristics of wheelchair propulsion; effects of level of spinal cord injury, terrain, and propulsion rate. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1996; 75: 292–299.
