Objective: To develop a measure of social integration following stroke.
Design: Question and response scale generation from qualitative interview-based work followed by item and factor analytic methods of test construction. Analysis of the psychometric properties of final index.
Subjects: Two hundred and sixty survivors of stroke, discharged at least six months previously from a general hospital.
Results: A 10-item Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) was developed. Each question is scored on a scale of 0–4 with a low score indicating a poor level of integration. From the 157 completed questionnaires, total scores ranged from 0 to 40 with a median of 24 (interquartile range 15–32). Initial testing of the psychometric properties of the SIPSO suggest that it is able to provide assessment of two distinct areas of patient integration. From analysis of completed questionnaires it is suggested that questions 1–5 on the SIPSO measure a factor related to physical functioning/mobility whilst questions 6–10 measure a factor related to social/emotional functioning. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability and construct validity were established.
Conclusions: The SIPSO provides a brief, valid and reliable assessment of an individual's ability to reintegrate to a ‘normal’ lifestyle. The SIPSO differs from other measures in that it provides assessment of both quantity and quality of activities and interaction, reflecting an individual’s ability to reintegrate to his/her own satisfaction. As a 10-item self-report questionnaire the SIPSO can be administered quickly and cheaply to large numbers of patients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Robinson J, Batstone G. Rehabilitation: a developmental challenge. A Kings Fund Working Paper. London: Kings Fund, 1996.
2.
Rehabilitation Advisory Group. Rehabilitation – a guide. London: Department of Health, 1997.
3.
Roth EJ, Heinemann AW, Lovell LL, Harvey RL, McGuire JR, Diaz S. Impairment and disability: their relation during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79: 329–335.
4.
Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med1993; 118: 622–629.
5.
Belanger L, Bolduc M, Noel M. Relative importance of after effects, environment and socio-economic factors on the social integration of stroke victims. Int J Rehabil Res1988; 11: 251–260.
6.
Trigg R, Wood VA, Langton Hewer R. Social reintegration after stroke: the first stages in the development of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO). Clin Rehabil1999; 13: 341–353.
7.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J1965; 14: 61–65.
8.
Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing1983; 12: 166–170.
9.
Hunt SM, McKenna SP et al. The Nottingham Health Profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med1981; 15a: 221–229.
10.
Snaith RP, Ahmed SN, Mehta S, Hamilton M. Assessment of primary depressive illness: Wakefield self-assessment depression inventory. Psychol Med1971; 1: 143–149.
11.
Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge, 1993.
12.
Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol1993; 78: 98–104
13.
Bland MJ, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet1986; i: 307–310.
14.
Sandin KJ, Cifu DX, Noll SF. Stroke rehabilitation. 4. Psychologic and social implications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75: S52–S55.
15.
Parker CJ, Gladman JR, Drummond AE. The role of leisure in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil1997; 19: 1–5.
16.
Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assessment1998; 2.
17.
O'Mahony P, Rogers G, Thomson R, Dobson R, James O. Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients?Age Ageing1998; 27: 19–21.
