Objective: To investigate the inter-rater reliability of stereognosis assessment in stroke patients, as measured by the Nottingham Sensory Assessment (NSA).
Subjects: Twenty stroke patients consented to participate in the study. The subjects were aged between 40 and 93 years, and were no more than three months post stroke.
Design: The stereognostic ability of the subjects was assessed by two of three examiners within a 24-hour period. The method laid out by the NSA was followed throughout the study.
Analysis: Point to point agreement of scores and therefore reliability levels were assessed between examiners using the kappa coefficient of agreement.
Results: The majority of subjects (n = 13) were found to have impaired stereognosis on their affected side. A good level of reliability was found for the majority of items (n = 32), with kappa values being rated as substantial or higher for most of the objects tested. In eight cases the reliability was fair or moderate. These cases included the glass, biro and 10p coin when the affected side was assessed by examiners 1 and 2, and the pencil when the same side was assessed by examiners 1 and 3. These levels of reliability were acceptable, but were not as high as the researchers had hoped.
Conclusion: It is concluded that the Nottingham method of stereognosis assessment is a reliable assessment tool between raters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Yekutiel M, Jariwala M, Stretch P. Sensory deficit in the hands of children with cerebral palsy: a new look at assessment and prevalence. Dev Med Child Neurol1994; 36: 619–624.
2.
Dannenbaum RM, Dykes RW. Sensory loss in the hand after sensory stroke: therapeutic rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1988; 69: 833–839.
3.
Carey LM. Somatosensory loss after stroke. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med1995; 7: 51–91.
4.
Dannenbaum RM, Jones LA. The assessment and treatment of patients who have sensory loss following cortical lesions. J Hand Ther1993; 6: 130–138.
5.
Carey LM, Oke LE, Matyas TA. Impaired touch discrimination after stroke: a quantitative test. J Neuro Rehabil1997; 11: 219–232.
6.
Reed CL, Caselli J, Farah MJ. Tactile agnosia: underlying impairment and implications for normal tactile object recognition. Brain1996; 119: 875–888.
7.
Fullerton JT. Evaluation of research studies. Part 4: Validity and reliability – concepts and application. J Nurse-Midwifery1993; 38: 121–125.
8.
Maher C. Pitfalls in reliability studies: some suggestions for change. Aust J Physiother1993; 39: 5–7.
9.
Lincoln NB, Crow JL, Jackson JM, Waters GR, Adams SA, Hodgson P. The unreliability of sensory assessments. Clin Rehabil1991; 5: 278–282.
10.
Kim JS, Choi-Kwon S. Discriminative sensory function after unilateral stroke. Stroke1996; 27: 677–682.
11.
Roland E. Astereognosis: tactile discrimination after localised hemispheric lesions in man. Arch Neurol1976; 33: 543–550.
12.
Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL. Hand movements: a window into haptic recognition. Cogn Psychol1987; 19: 342–368.
13.
Wade D. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
14.
Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Metzger VA. Identifying objects by touch: an ‘expert system’. Percept Psychophys1985; 37: 299–302.
15.
D'Olhaberriague L, Litvan I, Mitsas P, Mansbach HH. A reappraisal of reliability and validity studies in stroke. Stroke1996; 27: 2331–2336.
16.
Mauguiere F, Desmedt JE, Courjon J. Astereognosis and dissociated loss of frontal or parietal components of somatosensory evoked potentials in hemispheric lesions. Brain1983; 106: 271–311.
