Objective: The effect of muscle length on strength and dexterity after stroke was investigated. The aim was to determine if poor function at a particular muscle length could be attributed solely to differential weakness at this joint angle or whether an additional problem of differential dexterity exists.
Design: This descriptive research study measured elbow flexor and extensor strength as well as dexterity at three elbow joint angles: 30°, 60° and 90° flexion. Dexterity was measured independently of strength.
Subjects: Fifteen (seven female, eight male) chronic stroke patients (mean age 67 years) who could actively flex and extend their affected elbow participated. Ten neurologically normal control subjects (mean age 67 years) acted as controls.
Main outcome measures: Strength was measured as peak elbow flexor and extensor torque at three angles; and dexterity was measured as coherence for slow and fast tracking also at three angles.
Results: Dexterity was not affected by muscle length but strength was and this finding was the same for both stroke and controls. While the magnitude of the torque-angle curves was not significantly different between stroke and controls, the shape of torque-angle curves was altered after stroke so that both the elbow flexors (p < 0.05) and extensors (p < 0.05) tested weaker in the testing position where they were shortest.
Conclusion: Since there was no differential loss of dexterity, it appears that differential loss of strength, especially in the shortened range, may explain the clinical observation of poorer function at one muscle length than another after stroke. Specific training to strengthen the muscles in these ranges is therefore of clinical importance for rehabilitation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Jackson JH. Selected writings. In: Taylor J ed. John Hughlings Jackson. New York: Basic Books, 1958.
2.
Burke D. Spasticity as an adaptation to pyramidal tract injury. Adv Neurol1988; 47: 401–423.
3.
Landau WM. Spasticity: the fable of a neurological demon and the emperor's new therapy. Arch Neurol1974; 31: 217–219.
4.
Bernstein NA. On dexterity and its development. Moscow: Physical Culture and Sport Press (in Russian), 1991. Cited in Latash LP, Latash ML. A new book by NA Bernstein: ‘On dexterity and its development’. J Mot Behav1994; 26: 56–62.
5.
Ada L, O'Dwyer N, Green J, Yeo W, Neilson P. The nature of the loss of strength and dexterity in the upper limb following stroke. Hum Movement Sci1996; 15: 671–687.
6.
Carr J, Shepherd R. A motor relearning programme for stroke, second edition. London: Heinemann, 1987.
7.
Winter DA. Concerning the scientific basis for the diagnosis of pathological gait and for rehabilitation protocols. Physiotherapy (Can)1985; 37: 245–252.
8.
Kulig K, Andrews JG, Hay JG. Human strength curves. Exerc Sport Sci Rev1984; 12: 417–466.
9.
Smidt GL, Rogers MW. Factors contributing to the regulation and clinical assessment of muscular strength. Phys Ther1982; 62: 1283–1290.
10.
Herzog W. Biomaterials: muscle. In: Nigg BM, Herzog W eds. Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1994: 154–190.
11.
van Zuylen EJ, van Velzen A, van der Gon JJD. A biomechanical model for flexion torques of human arm muscles as a function of elbow angle. J Biomech1988; 21: 183–190.
12.
Zajac FE. Muscle and tendon: Properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng1989; 17: 359–411.
13.
Kreighbaum E, Barthels KM. Biomechanics: a qualitative approach for studying human movement, second edition. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Burgess Publishing, 1985.
14.
Leedham JS, Dowling JJ. Force-length, torque-angle and EMG-joint angle relationships of the human in vivobiceps brachii. Eur J App Physiol1995; 70: 421–426.
15.
Winters JM, Kleweno DG. Effect of initial upper-limb alignment on muscle contributions to isometric strength curves. J Biomech1993; 26: 143–153.
16.
Herzog W, Hasler E, Abrahamse SK. A comparison of knee extensor strength curves obtained theoretically and experimentally. Med Sci Sport Exerc1991; 23: 108–114.
17.
Colebatch JG, Gandevia SC, Spira PJ. Voluntary muscle strength in hemiparesis: Distribution of weakness at the elbow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1986; 49: 1019–1024.
18.
Nadeau S, Gravel D, Arsenault AB, Bourbonnais D, Goyette M. Dynamometric assessment of the plantarflexors in hemiparetic subjects: Relations between muscular, gait and clinical parameters. Scand J Rehabil Med1997; 29: 137–146.
19.
Nakamura R, Hosokawa T, Tsuji I. Relationship of muscle strength for knee extension to walking capacity in patients with spastic hemiparesis. Tohoku J Exp Med1985; 145: 335–340.
20.
Sjöström M, Fugl-Meyer AR, Nordin G, Wählby L. Post-stroke hemiplegia: Crural muscle strength and structure. Scand J Rehabil Med1980; 7(suppl): 53–60.
21.
Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther1985; 65: 175–180.
22.
Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisopodal in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner1964; 192: 540–542.
23.
Beppu H, Suda M, Tanaka R. Analysis of cerebellar motor disorders by visually guided elbow tracking movement. Brain1984; 107: 787–809.
24.
Jones RD, Donaldson IM. Measurement of sensory-motor Integrated function in neurological disorders: Three computerised tracking tasks. Med Biol Eng Comput1986; 24: 536–540.
25.
Jones DA, Bigland-Ritchie B, Edwards RH. Excitation frequency and muscle fatigue: mechanical responses during voluntary and stimulated contractions. Exp Neurol1979; 64: 401–413.
26.
Halaney ME, Carey JR. Tracking ability of hemiparetic and healthy subjects. Phys Ther1989; 69: 342–348.
27.
Jones RD, Donaldson IM. Measurement of integrated sensory-motor function following brain damage by a computerized preview tracking task. Int Rehabil Med1981; 3: 71–83.
28.
McRuer DT, Krendel ES. The human operator as a servo-element. J Franklin Inst1959; 267: 381–403 and 511–536.
29.
Neilson PD. Speed of response or bandwidth of voluntary system controlling elbow position in intact man. Med Biol Eng1972; 10: 450–459.
30.
Buchner DM, de Lateur BJ. The importance of skeletal muscle strength to physical function in older adults. Ann Behav Med1991; 13: 91–98.
31.
Graves JE, Pollock ML, Jones AE, Colvin AB, Leggett SH. Specificity of limited range of motion variable resistance training. Med Sci Sport Exerc1989; 21: 84–89.
32.
Herzog W, Guimaraes AC, Anton MG, Carter-Erdman KA. Moment-length relations of rectus femoris muscles of speed skaters/cyclists and runners. Med Sci Sport Exerc1991; 23: 1289–1296.
33.
Thépaut-Mathieu C, van Hoecke J, Maton B. Myoelectrical and mechanical changes linked to length-specificity during isometric training. J Appl Physiol1988; 64: 1500–1505.
