Objective: To analyse perceived impairments, disability, job restrictions and job changes in subjects with a neurapraxia and neurotmesis of the ulnar nerve five years after trauma.
Setting: Department of Rehabilitation of a University Hospital.
Subjects: Sixteen subjects with a neurotmesis (NT-group) and 20 subjects with a neurapraxia (NP-group) were compared by means of a structured interview assessing perceived impairments and change in job and a questionnaire assessing disabilities (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale: GARS).
Results: The NP-group perceived significantly more pain, loss of strength and sensation, loss of dexterity and perceived more job-related restrictions than the NT-group. The NP-group had significantly higher scores on the GARS. There was a moderate correlation between the visual analogue score of the pain and the GARS in the NP- and NT-groups. No significant difference was found between the groups with respect to job changes.
Conclusions: This study shows that subjects with a neurapraxia of the ulnar nerve perceive more impairments and disabilities compared with those subjects with a neurotmesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SIG Zorginformatie Utrecht, Landelijke Medische Registratie(LMR)1990–1995.
2.
Sunderland S. The peripheral nerve trunk in relation to injury. A classification of nerve injury. In: Sunderland S ed. Nerves and nerve injuries. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1978: 133–141.
3.
Dubuisson A, Kline DG. Indications for peripheral nerve and brachial plexus surgery. Neurol Clin1992; 10: 935–951.
Parry GJ. Electrodiagnostic studies in the evaluation of peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries. Neurol Clin1992; 10: 921–934.
6.
Vastamäki M, Kallio P. The results of secondary microsurgical repair of ulnar nerve injury. J Hand Surg1993; 18: 323–326.
7.
WHO. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: a manual of classification relating the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980.
8.
Marsh D. The validation of measures of outcome following suture of divided peripheral nerves supplying the hand. J Hand Surg1990; 15B: 25–34.
9.
Trevett MC, Tuson C, de Jager LT, Juon JM. The functional results of ulnar nerve repair. J Hand Surg1995; 20B: 444–446.
10.
Suurmeijer TPBM, Doeglas DM, Moum T et al. The Groningen Activity Restriction Scale for measuring disability: its utility in international comparisons. Am J Public Health1994; 84: 170–173.
