Introduction: Quantitative bone assessment today is primarily based on the analysis of bone mineral density (BMD). The geometric and structural properties of bone, which are important parameters for skeletal strength, are generally not considered in the routine clinical assessment of spinal cord injury-related osteopenia.
Objective: To study changes in structural and geometric properties of tibia bone longitudinally by means of peripheral quantitative computerized tomography and a biomechanical test method (bone stiffness measurement device Swing) in 12 subjects with spinal cord injury.
Design: Measurements were conducted in the 5th week and around the 104th week after the spinal cord injury in a university hospital.
Results: Paired Student's t-tests showed a significant decrease in trabecular (p < 0.05) and cortical bone (p < 0.05), as well as a significant decrease in geometric properties of tibia bone (p < 0.05) within two years after the spinal cord injury. Phase velocity propagation changed in three subjects within two years following the spinal cord injury.
Conclusions: This study indicates that beside changes in tissue composition, changes in bone geometric indices and in structural properties occur in the lower extremity after a spinal cord injury. In the tibia, consideration of geometric and biomechanical parameters of bone combined with bone mineral density measurements could result in an improved screening for spinal cord injury-related osteopenia and the prediction of fracture risk in spinal cord injury.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Griffiths HJ, Bushueff B, Zimmerman RE. Investigation of the loss of bone mineral in patients with spinal cord injury. Paraplegia1976; 14: 207–212.
2.
Elias AN, Gwinup G. Immobilization osteoporosis in paraplegia. J Am Paraplegia Soc1992; 15: 163–170.
3.
Uebelhart D, Demiaux-Domenech B, Roth M, Chantraine A. Bone metabolism in spinal cord injured individuals and in others who have prolonged immobilisation. A review. Paraplegia1995; 33: 669–673.
4.
Chantraine A, Nusgens B, Lapiere ChM. Bone remodelling during the development of osteoporosis in paraplegia. Calcif Tissue Int1986; 38: 323–327.
5.
Finsen V, Indredavik B, Fougner KJ. Bone mineral and hormone status in paraplegics. Paraplegia1992; 30: 343–347.
6.
Garland DE, Stewart CA, Adkins RH et al. Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. J Orthop Res1992; 10: 371–378.
7.
Biering-Sørensen F, Bohr H, Schaadt O. Bone mineral content of the lumbar spine and lower extremities years after spinal cord lesion. Paraplegia1988; 26: 293–301.
8.
Biering-Sørensen F, Bohr HH, Schaadt OP. Longitudinal study of bone mineral content in the lumbar spine, the forearm and the lower extremities after spinal cord injury. Eur J Clin Invest1990; 20: 330–335.
9.
Bergmann P, Heilporn A, Schoutens A, Paternot J, Tricot A. Longitudinal study of calcium and bone metabolism in paraplegic patients. Paraplegia1977–78; 15: 147–159.
10.
Szollar SM, Martin EME, Parthemore JG, Sartoris DJ, Deftos LJ. Demineralization in tetraplegic and paraplegic man over time. Spinal Cord1997; 35: 223–228.
11.
Wilmet E, Ismail AA, Heilporn A, Welraeds D, Bergmann P. Longitudinal study of the bone mineral content and of soft tissue composition after spinal cord section. Paraplegia1995; 33: 674–677.
12.
van der Wiel HE. The influence of mechanical factors on the skeleton. PhD-Thesis Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1993.
13.
Comarr AE, Hutchinson RH, Bors E. Extremity fractures of patients with spinal cord injuries. Am J Surg1962; 103: 732–739.
14.
Eichenholtz SN. Management of long-bone fractures in paraplegic patients. J Bone Joint Surg1963; 45-A:299–310.
15.
Ragnarsson KT, Heiner Sell G. Lower extremity fractures after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1981; 62: 418–423.
16.
Keating JF, Kerr M, Delargy M. Minimal trauma causing fractures in patients with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil1992; 14: 108–109.
17.
Freehafer AA, Mast WA. Lower extremity fractures in patients with spinal-cord injury. J Bone Joint Surg1965; 47-A: 683–694.
18.
Rüegsegger P. The use of peripheral QCT in the evaluation of bone remodelling. The Endocrinologist1994; 4: 167–176.
19.
Dequeker J. Assessment of quality of bone in osteoporosis-BIOMED I: fundamental study of relevant bone. Clin Rheumatol1994; 13: Suppl. No. 1.
20.
Brandenburger GH. Clinical determination of bone quality: is ultrasound an answer?Calcif Tissue Int1993; 53 (suppl 1): S151–S156.
21.
Einhorn TA. Bone strength: the bottom line. Calcif Tissue Int1992; 51: 333–339.
22.
Gillespie JA. The nature of the bone changes associated with nerve injuries and disuse. J Bone Joint Surg1954; 36B: 464–473.
23.
Lee TQ, Shapiro TA, Bell DM. Biomechanical properties of human tibias in long-term spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Devel1997; 34: 295–302.
24.
Stytz MR, Frieder O. Three-dimensional medical imaging modalities: an overview. Biomed Eng1990; 18: 1–25.
25.
Hayes WC, Bouxsein ML. Biomechanics of cortical and trabecular bone: implications for assessment of fracture risk. In: Mow VC, Hayes WC eds. Basic orthopaedic biomechanics, second edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997: 69–111.
26.
Bischof H. Schallwellen in langen Röhrenknochen: Eine Methode zur Bestimmung von Biegesteifigkeit und maximaler Bruchkraft. PhD thesis, University Zürich, 1993.
27.
Stüssi E. Entwicklung und Anpassung der Biegesteifigkeit des Extremitätenskelettes durch Training am Beispiel der Tibia [Development and adaptation of bending stiffness of the skeleton of the extremities as exemplified by the human tibia through exercise]. Sportverl Sportschad1994; 8: 103–110.
28.
Herzog R, Ring M, Ehwald J, Stüssi E. Comparison of changes in bone stiffness due to space flight with normal age related changes. J Biomech1998; 31: 54-54.
29.
Fäh D, Stüssi E. Phase velocity measurement of flexural waves in human tibia. J. Biomech1988; 21: 975–983.
30.
Stüssi E, Fäh D. Assessment of bone mineral content by in vivo measurement of flexural wave velocities. Med Biol Eng Comput1988; 26: 349–354.
31.
de Bruin ED, Rozendal RH, Stüssi E. Reliability of phase-velocity measurements of tibial bone. Phys Ther1998; 78: 1166–1174.
32.
Stüssi E, Lawson R. The flight of a bone stiffness measurement device on Euromir'95 and future applications. Microgravity News1996; 9: 1–4.
33.
Overgaard K, Hansen MA, Riis BJ, Christiansen C. Discriminatory ability of bone mass measurements (SPA and DEXA) for fractures in elderly postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int1992; 50: 30–35.
34.
Einhorn TA. Biomechanics of bone. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA eds. Principles of bone biology. London: Academic Press, 1996.
35.
Hayes WC, Piazza SJ, Zysset PK. Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am1991; 29: 1–18.
36.
Snyder SM, Schneider E. Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Orthop Res1991; 9: 422–431.
37.
Cheng S, Toivanen JA, Suominen H, Toivanen JT, Timonen J. Estimation of structural and geometrical properties of cortical bone by computerized tomography in 78-year-old women. J Bone Miner Res1995; 10: 139–148.
38.
Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D, Palermo L, Gluer CC, Genant HK. Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res1993; 8: 1211–1217.
39.
Melton LJ, Chao EYS, Lane J. Biomechanical aspects of fractures. In: Riggs BL, Melton LJ eds. Osteoporosis: etiology, diagnosis, and management. New York: Raven Press, 1988: 111–131.
40.
Van der Perre G, Lowet G, Borgwardt Christensen A. In vivo assessment of bone quality by vibration and wave propagation techniques; Part III. Proceedings of the COMAC-BME II.2.6 Meeting, Toulouse, France, 1993.
