Objective: To identify the factors associated with carer strain following stroke.
Design: Co-resident spouses of stroke patients were sent questionnaire measures of their perceptions of strain, stress, mood, handicap, adjustment, social support, life satisfaction and personality, and patient's mood and independence in activities of daily living.
Setting: Stroke spouses were identified from the stroke register at City Hospital, Nottingham.
Results: In a sample of 222 carers, 37% had significant strain. Strain was highly correlated with negative affectivity on the Positive and Negative Affectivity Scale, carer mood on the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and carer's perceptions of patient's independence in activities of daily living on the Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale (EADL). Logistic regression analysis of 96 of these carers supported the correlations and showed three factors, carer GHQ-12, patient EADL and negative affectivity, were independently associated with carer strain.
Conclusion: The relationship between these factors and strain needs to be tested prospectively. Early identification of carers who may be at risk of strain later on will enable services to be targeted at prevention rather than cure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Haug MR. Home care for the ill elderly: who benefits?Am J Public Health1985; 75: 127–128.
2.
Lewycka M. Survival skills for carers: a resource pack for trainers. National Extension College Trust, Ltd., 1993.
3.
Robinson BC. Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index. J Gerontol1983; 38: 344–348.
4.
Sandin KJ, Cifu DX, Noll SF. Stroke rehabilitation 4. Psychologic and social implications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75: 552–555.
5.
Glass TA, Matchar DB, Belyea M, Feussner JR. Impact of social support on outcome from stroke. Stroke1993; 24: 64–70.
6.
Warburton RW. Implementing caring for people: home and away. London: Department of Health, HMSO, 1994.
7.
Twigg J. Carers: research and practice. London: HMSO, 1992.
8.
Zarit SH, Edwards AB. Family caregiving: research and clinical intervention. In: Woods RT ed. Handbook of the clinical psychology of ageing. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
9.
Cantor MH. Strain among caregivers: a study of experience in the United States. The Gerontologist1983; 23: 597–604.
10.
Holbrook M. Stroke: social and emotional outcome. J R Coll Physicians Lond1982; 16:100–130.
11.
Anderson CS, Linto J, Stewart-Wynne EG. A population-based assessment of the impact and burden of caregiving for long-term stroke survivors. Stroke1995; 26: 843–849.
12.
Schulz R, Tomkins CA, Rau MT. A longitudinal study of the psychosocial impact of stroke on primary support persons. Psychol Ageing1988; 3: 131–141.
13.
Kinsella GJ, Duffy FD. Psychosocial readjustment in the spouses of aphasic patients. Scand J Rehabil Med1979; 11: 129–132.
14.
Sanford JRA. Tolerance of debility in elderly dependents by supporters at home: its significance for hospital practice. BMJ1975; 3: 471–473.
15.
Anderson R. The aftermath of stroke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
16.
Thompson SC, Sobolew-Shubin A, Graham MA, Janigian AS. Psychosocial adjustment following a stroke. Soc Sci Med1989; 28: 239–247.
17.
Lincoln NB, Willis D, Philips SA, Juby LC, Berman P. Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients. Stroke1996; 27: 18–23.
18.
Lincoln NB, Gladman JRF, Berman P, Luther A, Challen K. Rehabilitation needs of community stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil1998; 20: 457–463.
19.
Elmstahl S, Malmberg B, Annerstedt L. Caregiver's burden of patients 3 years after stroke assessed by a novel caregiver burden scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996; 77: 177–182.
20.
Grant JS. Home care problems experienced by stroke survivors and their family caregivers. Home Healthcare Nurse1996; 14: 892–902.
21.
WHO (World Health Organization). Cerebrovascular disease: a clinical and research classification. WHO offset series no. 43. Geneva: WHO, 1978.
22.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav1983; 24: 385–396.
23.
Goldberg D. General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1992.
24.
Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care1994; 3: 11–16.
25.
Nouri FM, Lincoln NB. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil1987; 1: 301–305.
26.
Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image, reprint edition. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1989.
27.
Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVillis R. Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. Health Educ Monographs1978; 6: 161–170.
28.
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol1988; 54: 1063–1070.
29.
Watson M, Greer S. Development of a questionnaire measure of emotional control. J Psychosom Res1983; 27: 299–305.
30.
Scheier MF, Carver CS. Dispositional optimism and physical well-being: the influence of generalised outcome expectancies on health. J Pers1987; 5: 169–210.
31.
Power MJ, Champion LA, Aris SJ. The development of a measure of social support: the Significant Others Scale (SOS). Br J Clin Psychol1988; 27: 349–358.
32.
Felton BJ, Revenson TA, Hinrichson GA. Stress and coping in the explanation of psychological adjustment among chronically ill adults. Soc Sci Med1984; 18: 889–898.
33.
Deiner E, Emmons RA, Larson RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Pers Assess1985; 49: 71–76.
