An evaluation of neurobehavioural problems as perceived by family members and levels of family stress 1–3 years following traumatic brain injury in Japan

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain the proportion of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to a Japanese district hospital and to evaluate the levels of stress and anxiety in families living with those TBI patients.

Design: A retrospective study of patients admitted to hospital from April 1995 to March 1997 and a questionnaire study of family members of survivors.

Setting and subjects: All patients referred or transferred to the Emergency Department at the Saga Medical School Hospital, Japan with a primary diagnosis of TBI were studied. Family members living with TBI patients were sent questionnaires.

Main outcome measures: The Barthel Index, the Patient Competency Rating Scale, the modified Caregiver Strain Index and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Results: There were 34 patients who required hospitalization for care relating to TBI. Of these, nine family members took part in the questionnaire study. Three carers reported fairly high levels of stress and another three carers were considered to be at risk of anxiety and depression. There was a tendency for family members who reported that patients had difficulties in performing behavioural tasks to have higher levels of stress themselves.

Conclusion: These preliminary results showed that family members experienced certain levels of stress and were also at risk of anxiety and depression. The impact of TBI on families as well as patients should receive more attention.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnes M , Eames P , Evans C et al. Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a working party report of the British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. London: British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1998.

National Head Injury Foundation . Trauma: the silent epidemic. National Head Injury Foundation, Framingham, MA, 1988. Cited in Kosciulek JF. Relationship of family schema to family adaptation to brain injury. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 821–830.

Jacobs HE . The Los Angeles head injury survey: procedures and initial findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 425–431.

Thomsen IV . Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma: a 10–15 year second follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 260–268.

Cole JR , Cope DN , Cervelli L . Rehabilitation of the severely brain-injured patient: a community-based, low-cost model program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 38–40.

Jennett B . Epidemiology of head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996; 60: 362–369.

Mizuochi K , Andou N . Head trauma. Rinsho Rihebiriteshon – an extra issue 1994; 153–164 (in Japanese).

Brooks N , Campsie L , Symington C , Beattie A , McKinlay W . The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: a relative's view. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986; 49: 764–770.

Thomsen IV . The patient with severe head injury and his family. Scand J Rehabil Med 1974; 6: 180–183.

10.

Oddy M , Humphrey M , Uttley D . Stresses upon the relatives of head-injured patients. Br J Psychiatry 1978; 133: 507–513.

11.

Marsh NV , Kersel DA , Havill JH , Sleigh JW . Caregiver burden at 6 months following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 225–238.

12.

Wade DT , Collin C . The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 1987; 10: 64–67.

13.

Prigatano GP , Fordyce DJ , Zeuner HK et al. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.

14.

Prigatano GP , Ogano M , Amakusa B . A cross-cultural study on impaired self-awareness in Japanese patients with brain dysfunction. Neuropsychiatr Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1997; 6: 43–48.

15.

Robinson BC . Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index. J Gerontol 1983; 38: 344–348.

16.

Zigmond AS , Snaith RP . The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361–370.

17.

Teasdale G , Jennett B . Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81–83.

18.

Ohta T , Waga S , Handa H et al. New grading of level of disordered consciousness. Noushinkeigeka 1974; 2: 623–627 (in Japanese with English abstract).

19.

Lezak MD . Brain damage is a family affair. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1988; 10: 111–123.

20.

Brooks DN . The head-injured family. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1991; 13: 155–188

21.

Engli M , Kirsivali-Farmer K . Needs of family members of critically ill patients with and without acute brain injury. J Neurosci Nurs 1993; 25: 78–85.

22.

Watanabe Y , McLellan DL . Services and resources needed by families living with a traumatic brain injured person: the views of British family members. Jpn J Rehabil Med 1999; 36: 180–187.

23.

Ohashi M , Suk CK , Murase S . Traumatic brain injury: physical complications and long-term prognosis. Rinsho Rihabiriteshon 1992; 1: 511–516 (in Japanese).

24.

Kunishio K , Matsumoto Y , Kawada S et al. Neuropsychological outcome and social recovery of head-injured patients. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1993; 33: 824–829.