Biochemical evaluation of vacuum-assisted venous drainage: a randomized,prospective study

Abstract

Aims of the study: In this prospective, randomized study, we investigate the potential advantages of vacuum-assisted venous drainage (VAVD), compared to gravitational drainage (GD), in patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, concerning biochemical markers of organ and blood cell damage.

Materials and methods: Seventy-two consecutive patients were randomized into two groups [‘Vacuum’ (VAVD) n= 36; ‘Not vacuum’ (GD) n= 36]. VAVD was achieved using a wall vacuum source and with a suction regulator connected to the vent port of the hardshell venous reservoir. In the VAVD group, we used 28-French venous cannulas, and 36-French in the GD group. In the VAVD group, we measured arterial perfusion flow (APF) and the venous reservoir volume (VRV) with and without vacuum application just after starting extracorporeal circulation (ECC). Six blood samples were drawn at different times before, during and after ECC. Routine blood tests were performed to evaluate hemolysis, and hepatic and renal function.

Results: The two groups were similar in terms of preoperative and operative characteristics. There were no significant differences in biochemical markers of organ function or hemolysis between the two groups. In the VAVD patients, platelet count was higher at 24 h after the end of the operation (VAVD 151.77± 50.28 μl versus Not vacuum 124.93± 41.60 μl, p= 0.028). With the narrower venous cannulas (28-French), only VAVD achieved a satisfactory APF (VAVD 2.35± 0.38 l/min/m² versus GD 1.88± 0.27 l/min/m², p= 0.002), with a larger VRV (VAVD 1091.67± 421 ml versus GD 808.33± 284.31 ml, p= 0.025).

Conclusion: Vacuum-assisted venous drainage is a technique comparable to gravitational drainage with regard to hemolysis and organ perfusion. It allows better perfusion flow and heart decompression with smaller venous cannulas. This study suggests reduced platelet consumption with VAVD.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Munster K , Andersen U , Mikkelsen J , Pettersson G. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage (VAVD) . Perfusion 1999; 14: 419-423 .

Tevaearai HT , Mueller XM , Jegger D , Augsburger M , Stumpe F , von Segesser LK. Optimization of the pump driven venous return for minimally invasive open heart surgery . Int J Artif Organs 1999; 22: 684-689 .

Solomon L , Sutter FP , Golkman SM , Mitchell JM , Casey K. Augmented femoral venous return . Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 55: 1262-1263 .

Fried DW , Zombolas TL , Weiss SJ. Single pump mechanically aspirated venous drainage (SPMAVD) for cardiac operation . Perfusion 1995; 10: 327-332 .

Galletti PM , Brecher GA. Heart-lung bypass: principles and techniques of extracorporeal circulation. New York: Grune and Stratton , 1962: 174-184.

Taketani S , Sawa Y , Masai T. A novel technique for cardiopulmonary bypass using vacuum system for venous drainage with pressure relief valve: an experimental study . Artif Organs 1998; 22: 337-341 .

Sistino JJ , Michler RE , Mongero LB. Laboratory evaluation of a low prime closed-circuit cardiopulmonary bypass system . J Extra-Corpor Technol 1993; 24: 116-119 .

Lau CL , Posther KE , Stephenson GR. Mini-circuit cardiopulmonary bypass with vacuum-assisted venous drainage: feasibility of an asanguineous prime in the neonate . Perfusion 1999; 14: 389-396 .

Wabeke E , Elstrodt JM , Mook PH , Gathier S , Wildevuur CR. Clear prime for infant cardiopulmonary bypass: a miniaturized circuit . J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1988; 29: 117-122 .

10.

Berryessa R , Wiencek R , Jacobson J , Hollingshead D , Farmer K , Cahill G. Vacuum-assisted venous return in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass . Perfusion 2000; 15: 63-67 .

11.

Darling E , Kaemmer D , Lawson S. Experimental use of an ultra-low prime neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass circuit utilizing vacuum-assisted venous drainage . J Extra-Corpor Technol 1998; 30: 184-189 .

12.

Miyauchi Y , Isomura K. Quantitative and functional changes in platelets and their preservation during extracorporeal circulation . J Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 23: 383-390 .

13.

Chambers SD , Ceccio SL , Annich GA , Barlett RH. Extreme negative pressure does not cause erythrocyte damage in flowing blood . ASAIO J 1999; 45: 431-435 .

14.

Rider SP , Simon LV , Rice BJ , Poulton CC. Assisted venous drainage, venous air, and gaseous microemboli transmission into the arterial line: an in vitro study . J Extra-Corpor Technol 1998; 30: 160-165 .

15.

Willcox TW , Mitchell SJ , Gorman DF. Venous air in the bypass circuit: a source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum-assisted drainage . Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 1285-1289 .