This study investigates the acquisition of a non-null-subject language (English) by
speakers of two different null-subject languages (Spanish and Chinese) in light of
recent research in theoretical syntax which shows that different syntactic
mechanisms are at work in the expression of null subjects in these two languages.
While null subjects in Spanish are manifestations of pro, in Chinese they
may be pro or a null topic, the latter licensed by a topic chain (Huang,
1984; 1989). Topic chains have been shown to license null topics in other languages
(Roeper and Weissenborn, 1990; Weissenborn, 1992) but cannot do so across a
lexically filled CP. We propose that this difference in licensing mechanism ought to
affect the acquisition of English by Chinese and Spanish speakers. Data from an
elicited imitation task show that Chinese speakers significantly outperform Spanish
speakers in disallowing null subjects in English. This can be attributed to the
Chinese speakers' reaction to the presence of lexically filled CPs in
English, which prevents them from licensing null subjects via topic chains. Spanish
speakers, on the other hand, because they license null subjects via Agr (Agreement),
are unaffected by lexically filled CPs in English and continue to allow null
subjects. Interestingly, however, Spanish speakers at higher levels of proficiency
reject null subjects in certain contexts, suggesting that reanalysis of this feature
of English can and may occur.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balcolm, P.
1990:
Elicited imitation: some methodological considerations
. In
Burmeister, H.
and
Rounds, P.
, editors, Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the Second Language
Research Forum, Vol. 1. University of Oregon,
169–185
.
2.
Borer, H.1986:
I-subjects
. Linguistic Inquiry17,
375–416
.
3.
Campos, H.1986:
Indefinite object drop
. Linguistic Inquiry, 17,
354-359
.
4.
Chomsky, N.1981: Lectures on Government and Binding.
Dordrecht: Foris
.
5.
Christie, K.
and
Lantolf, J.P.1992:
The ontological status of learner grammaticality judgements in UG
approaches to L2 acquisition
. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata3,
31–57
.
6.
Davies, W.1996:
Morphological Uniformity and the Null Subject Parameter in Adult SLA
. Studies in Second Language Acquisition18,
475–493
.
7.
Edmonds, J.1985: A unified theory of syntactic categories.
Dordrecht: Foris Publications
.
8.
Ellis, R.1991:
Grammaticality judgements and second language acquisition
. Studies in Second Language Acquisition13,
161–186
.
9.
Eubank, L.1993/1994:
On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development
. Language Acquisition3,
183–208
.
10.
Eubank, L.1994: Optionality and the initial state in L2
development. In
Hoekstra, T.
and
Scwhartz, B.
, editors, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: papers in
honor of Kenneth Wexler from 1991 GLOW workshops.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins
, 369–388.
11.
Evans, G.1980:
Pronouns
. Linguistic Inquiry11,
337–362
.
12.
Gass, S.
and
Selinker, L.1983: Language transfer in language learning.
Rowley, MA: Newbury House
.
13.
Gerken, L.1990:
A metrical account of children's subjectless sentences
. Proceedings of NELS20,
121–134
.
14.
Goss, N.
,
Zhang, Y-H.
and
Lantolf, J.P.
1991:
Two heads may be better than one: assessing learner strategies in
grammaticality judgement tasks
Paper presented at Theory Construction and Methodology in Second
Language Research, Michigan State University, MI.
15.
Haegeman, L.1990:
Understood subjects in English diaries
. Multilingua9,
157–199
.
16.
Hamayan,E.
,
Markman, B.
,
Pelletier, S.
and
Tucker, G.R.1978:
Differences in performance in elicited imitation between French monolingual
and English-speaking bilingual children
. International Review of Applied Linguistics16,
330–339
.
17.
Hatch, E.
and
Lazaraton, A.1991: The research manual: design and statistics for applied
linguistics.
Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle
.
18.
Hawkins, R.
and
Chan, Y.1997:
The partial availability of universal grammar in second language
acquisition: the ‘failed functional features hypothesis’
. Second Language Research1,
187–226
.
19.
Hilles, S.1986:
Interlanguage and the pro-drop parameter
. Second Language Research2,
33–52
.
20.
Hilles, S.1991: Access to Universal Grammar in second language
acquisition. In
Eubank, L.
, editor, Point counterpoint: universal grammar in the second language.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins
, 305–338.
21.
Huang, C-T.J.1984:
On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns
. Linguistic Inquiry15,
531–574
.
22.
Huang, C-T.J.1989: Pro drop in Chinese: a generalized control theory.
In
Jaeggli, O.
and
Safir, K.
,editors, The null subject parameter.
Dordrecht: Kluwer
, 185–214.
23.
Huang, C-T.J.
and
Li, Y-H.A.1996: New horizons in Chinese linguistics.
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
.
24.
Hyams, N.1986: Language acquisition and the theory of parameters.
Dordrecht: Reidel
.
25.
Hyams, N.1989: The null subject parameter in language
acquisition. In
Jaeggli, O.
and
Safir, K.
,editors, The null subject parameter.
Dordrecht: Kluwer
, 215–238.
26.
Iatridou, S. 1991: Topics on conditionals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
MIT, Cambridge, MA.
27.
Jaeggli, O.1982: Topics in romance syntax.
Dordrecht: Foris Publications
.
28.
Kayne, R.1991:
Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO
. Linguistic Inquiry22,
647–686
.
29.
Kellerman, E.1983: Now you see it, now you don't. In
Gass, S.
and
Selinker, L.
,editors, Language transfer and language learning.
Rowley, MA: Newberry House
, 112–134.
30.
Kellerman, E.
and
Sharwood Smith, M.1986: Cross-linguistic influence in second language
acquisition.
Oxford: Pergamon Press
.
31.
Lakshmanan, U.1985: Universal Grammar in second language acquisition.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins
.
32.
Lakshmanan, U.1991: Morphological uniformity and null subjects in child second
language acquisition.In
Eubank,L.
,editor, Point counterpoint: universal grammar in the second
language.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins
, 389–410.
33.
Lakshmanan, U.
and
Selinker, L.1994:
The status of CP and the tensed complementizer that in the developing L2
grammars of English
. Second Language Research10,
25–48
.
34.
Lantolf, J.P.
,
Toribio, A.J.
,
Roebuck, R.
and
Perone, A.
1993:
Introspection and repetition: a comparative study of second language
research methodologies
. Paper presented at the 13th Second Language Research
Forum, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie-Mellon University,
Pittsburgh, PA.
35.
Liceras, J.1988: Syntax and stylistics: more on the pro-drop
parameter. In
Pankhurst, J.
,
Sharwood Smith, M.
and
Van Buren, P.
, editors, Learnability and second languages: a book of readings.
Dordrecht: Foris
, 71–92.
36.
Martohardjono, G.
and
Gair, J.1993: Apparent UG inaccessibility in second language acquisition:
misapplied principles or principled misapplications? In
Eckman, F.
, editor, Confluence: linguistics, L2 acquisition and speech
pathology.
Amsterdam: Benjamins
, 79–103.
37.
Montalbetti, M. 1984: After binding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT,
Cambridge, MA.
38.
Munnich, E.
,
Flynn, S.
and
Martohardjono, G.
1993:
Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgement tasks: what they measure
and how they relate to each other
. Paper presented at Recent Advances in Second Language
Acquisition, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
39.
Núñez del Prado, Z.
,
Foley, C.
and
Lust, B.
1993:
The significance of CP to the pro-drop parameter: an experimental study
comparing Spanish and English
. Paper presented at the 25th CLIS, Stanford
University, Stanford, CA.
40.
Odlin, T.1989: Language transfer: cross-linguistic influence in language
learning.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
41.
Phinney, M.1987: The pro-drop parameter in second language
acquisition. In
Roeper, T.
and
Williams, E.
, editors, Parameter Settings.
Dordrecht: Reidel
, 221–246.
42.
Pierce, A. 1989: On the emergence of syntax: a crosslinguistic study.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
43.
Radloff, C.1991: Sentence repetition testing for studies of community
bilingualism.
Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at
Arlington, TX
.
44.
Register, N.1988:
Influences of typological parameters on L2 learners' judgements of
null pronouns in English
. Language Learning40/3,
369–385
.
45.
Rizzi, L.1982: Issues in Italian syntax.
Dordrecht: Foris
.
46.
Rizzi, L.1986:
Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro
. Linguistic Inquiry17,
501–558
.
47.
Rizzi, L.1994: Early null subjects and root null subjects. In
Lust, B.
,
Hermon, G.
and
Kornfilt, J.
, editors, Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Cross
linguistic perspectives Volume 2: Binding, dependencies, and learnability.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
, 249–272.
48.
Roeper, T.
and
Weissenborn, J.1990: How to make parameters work. In
Frazier, L.
and
de Villiers, J.
, editors, Language processing and language acquisition.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
, 147–162.
49.
Sajavaara, K.1986: Transfer and second language speech processing. In
Kellerman, E.
and
Sharwood Smith, M.
, editors, Cross-linguistic influence in second language
acquisition.
Oxford: Pergamon
, 66–79.
50.
Schwartz, B.1998: On two hypothesis of ‘transfer’ in L2A:
Minimal trees and absolute L1 influence. In
Flynn, S.
,
Martohardjono, G.
and
O'Neil, W.
, editors, The generative study of second language acquisition.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
, 35–59.
51.
Schwartz, B.
and
Sprouse, R.1996:
L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model
. Second Language Research12,
40–72
.
52.
Selinker, L.1974: Interlanguage. In
Richards, J.
, editor, Error analysis.
London: Longman
.
53.
Taraldsen, K. 1978: On the nominative island condition, vacuous application
and the that-trace filter. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University Linguistic Club.
54.
Thrasher, R. 1974: Shouldn't ignore this strings: a study of
conversational deletion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI.
55.
Toribio, A.J.
,
Roebuck, R.
and
Lantolf, J.P.
1992:
On the role of UG in adult second language acquisition: evidence from
missing subjects
. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society
of America, Los Angeles, CA.
56.
Tsao, F. 1977:A functional study of topic in Chinese: the first step toward
discourse analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, USC, Los Angeles, CA.
57.
Vainikka, A.
and
Young-Scholten, M.1994: Direct access to X'-theory: evidence from Korean
and Turkish adults learning German. In
Hoekstra, T.
and
Scwhartz, B.
, editors, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: papers in
honor of Kenneth Wexler from 1991 GLOW workshops.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins
, 256–316.
58.
Valian, V.1991:
Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children
. Cognition40,
21–81
.
59.
Valian, V.1994: Children's postulation of null subjects: parameter
setting and language acquisition. In
Lust, B.
,
Hermon, G.
and
Kornfilt, K.
, editors, Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Cross
linguistic perspectives Volume 2: binding, dependencies, and learnability.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
.
60.
Weissenborn, J.1992: Null subjects in early grammars: implications for
parameter-setting theories. In
Weissenborn, J.
,
Goodluck, H.
and
Roeper, T.
, editors, Theoretical issues in language acquisition.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
, 269–299.
61.
White, L.1985:
The pro-drop parameter in adult second language acquisition
. Language Learning, 35,
47–62
.
62.
White, L.1986: Implications of parametric variation for adult second
language acquisition: an investigation of the pro-drop parameter. In
Cook, V.
, editor, Experimental approaches to second language acquisition.
Oxford: Pergamon
, 55–72.
63.
White, L.1989: Universal Grammar and second language acquisition.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins
.
