This study provided empirical evidence of the validity of four vocabulary tests:
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III (PPVT-3), Expressive Vocabulary Test (EVT),
Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (ROWPVT), and Expressive One-Word Picture
Vocabulary Test-Revised (EOWPVT-R) against a 150- utterance language sample for 28
normally-developing pre-school children. Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts
(SALT) standard scores on number of different words, total number of words, and mean
length of utterance were used to provide evidence of convergent and discriminant
criterion validity. Performance on the vocabulary tests showed significant weak to
moderate correlations with the semantic measure, and the predicted lower
relationship with the non-semantic measures. Despite this, individual score analysis
showed considerable variation, indicating caution predicting conversational language
performance from standardized tests.
Aram, D. M.
,
Morris, R.
and
Hall, N. E.1993:
Clinical and research congruence in identifying children with specific
language impairment
. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research36,
580-591
.
3.
Crago, M.1990:
Development of communicative competence in Inuit children: implications for
speech-language pathology
. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders13,
73-83
.
4.
Dunn, L. M.
and
Dunn, L. M.1997: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III.
Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service
.
5.
Dunn, M.
,
Flax, J.
,
Sliwinski, M.
and
Aram, D.1996:
The use of spontaneous language measures as criteria for identifying
children with specific language impairment: an attempt to reconcile clinical
and research incongruence
. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research39,
643-655
.
6.
Evans, J. L.1996: Plotting the complexities of language sample
analysis. In:
Cole, K. N.
,
Dale, P. S.
and
Thal, D. J.
, editors, Assessment of communication and language.
Baltimore, MD: Brookes
, 207-256.
Gardner, M. F.1990: Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test - Revised.
Novato, CA: Academic Therapy
.
9.
Gavin, W. J.
and
Giles, L.1996:
Sample size effects on temporal reliability of language sample measures of
preschool children
. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research39,
1258-1262
.
10.
Gray, S.
,
Plante, E.
,
Vance, R.
and
Henrichsen, M.1999:
The diagnostic accuracy of four vocabulary tests administered to
preschool-aged children
. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools30,
196-206
.
11.
Heinze, B. A.
and
Johnson, K. L.1985: Easy does it: fluency activities for young children.
Moline, IL: Linguisystems
.
12.
Hutchinson, T. A.1996:
What to look for in the technical manual: twenty questions for users
. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools27,
109-121
.
13.
Klee, T.1985:
Clinical language sampling: analysing the analyses
. Child Language Teaching and Therapy1,
182-187
.
14.
Klee, T.1992:
Developmental and diagnostic characteristics of quantitative measures of
children’s language production
. Topics in Language Disorders12,
28-41
.
15.
Klee, T.
,
Schaffer, M.
,
May, S.
,
Membrino, I.
and
Mougey, K.1989:
A comparison on the age-MLU relation in normal and specifically
language-impaired preschool children
. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders54,
226-233
.
16.
Mayer, M.1974: Frog goes to dinner.
NY: Dial Books
.
17.
McFadden, T. U.1996:
Creating language impairments in typically-achieving children: the pitfalls
of ‘normal’ normative sampling
. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools27,
3-9
.
18.
Messick, S. L.1989: Validity. In
Lin, R. L.
, editor, Educational measurement, third edition.
NY: Macmillan
.
19.
Miller, J.1981: Assessing language production in children: experimental
procedures.
Baltimore, MD: University Park
.
20.
Miller, J.
and
Chapman, R.1985: Systemic analysis of language transcripts.
Madison, WI: Language Analysis Laboratory
.
21.
Miller, J.
and
Chapman, R.1981:
The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes
. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research24,
154-161
.
22.
Miller, J.
and
Nockerts, A.2000: Systematic analysis of language transcripts, v6.1.
Madison, WI: Language Analysis Laboratory
.
23.
Restrepo, M. A.1998:
Identifiers of predominantly Spanish-speaking children with language impairment
. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research41,
1398-1411
.
24.
Rice, M. L.
and
Bode, J. V.1993:
GAPS in the verb lexicons of children with specific language impairment
. First Language13,
113-131
.
25.
Rogoff, B.1990: Apprentice in thinking: cognitive development in social
contexts.
New York, NY: Oxford University Press
.
26.
Rogoff, B.
and
Lave, J.1984: Everyday cognition: its development in social contexts.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
27.
SAS Institute
, 1998: Statview.
Cary, NC: SAS Institute
.
28.
Stockman, I. J.2000:
The new Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III: an illusion of unbiased assessment?Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools31,
340-353
.
29.
Templin, M. C.1957: Certain language skills in children.
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
.
30.
Ukrainetz, T. A.1998:
Beyond Vygotsky: what Soviet activity theory offers naturalistic language intervention
. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology22,
122-133
.
31.
Ukrainetz, T. A.
and Duncan, D. S. 2000:
From old to new: concerns with score increases on the PPVT-III
. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools31,
336-339
.
32.
Washington, J.
and
Craig, H.1999:
Performances of at-risk, African-American preschoolers on the Peabody
Picture Vocabulary Test-III
. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools30,
75-82
.
33.
Watkins, R. V.
,
Kelly, D. J.
,
Harbers, H. M.
and
Hollis, W.1995:
Measuring children’s lexical diversity: differentiating typical
and impaired language learners
. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research38,
1349-1355
.
34.
Watkins, R. V.
,
Rice, M. L.
and
Moltz, C. C.1993:
Verb use by language-impaired and normally developing children
. First Language13,
133-143
.
35.
Wertsch, J. V.1981: The concept of activity in Soviet psychology.
NY: M. E. Sharpe
.
36.
Williams, K. T.1997: Expressive Vocabulary Test.
Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service
.
