Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the possibility of creating positive washback by focusing on factors in the background of the test development process and anticipating the conditions most likely to lead to positive wash-back. The article reports on a multiphase empirical study investigating the washback effects of a needs-based test of spoken language proficiency on the content, teaching, classroom activities and learning outcomes of the ITA (international teaching assistants) training program linked to it. As such, the conceptual framework underlying the study differs from previous models in that it includes the processes before test development and test design as two main components of washback investigation. The analysis of the data - collected from different stakeholders through interviews, observations and test administration at different intervals before, during and after the training program - suggests a positive relationship between the test and the immediate teaching and learning outcomes. There is, however, no evidence linking the test to the policy or educational changes at an institutional level.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderson, J. C. 1986: Innovations in language testing. In Portal, M. , editor, Innovations in language testing. NFER Nelson , 93-105.

Alderson, J. C. 1991: Language testing in 1990s: how far have we come? How much further have we to go? In Anivan, S. , editor, Current developments in language testing. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre , 1-26.

Alderson, J. C. and Hamp-Lyons, L. 1996: TOEFL preparation courses: a study of washback . Language Testing 13, 280-297 .

Alderson, J. C. and Wall, D. 1993: Does washback exist ? Applied Linguistics 14, 41-69 .

Andrews, S. , Fullilove, J. and Wong, Y. 2002: Targeting washback: a case-study . System 30, 207-223 .

Bachman, L. and Palmer, A. 1996: Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press .

Bailey, K. 1996: Working for washback: a review of the washback concept in language testing . Language Testing 13, 257-279 .

Berwick, R. 1989: Needs assessment in language programming: from theory to practice. In Johnson, R. K. , editor, The second language curriculum. Cambridge University Press , 48-62.

Brindley, G. 1989: The role of needs analysis in adult ESL program design. In Johnson, R. K. , editor, The second language curriculum. Cambridge University Press , 48-62.

10.

Cheng, L. 1997: How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong . Language and Education 11, 38-54 .

11.

Douglas, D. and Myers, C. 1990: Teaching assistant communication strategies. Videotape and instructor’s manual. Iowa State University Media Production Unit .

12.

Frederiksen, J. R. and Collins, A. 1989: A systems approach to educational testing . Educational Researcher 18, 27-32 .

13.

Hughes, A. 1989: Testing for language teachers. Cambridge University Press .

14.

Hughes, A. 1993: Backwash and TOEFL 2000. Unpublished manuscript. University of Reading.

15.

Khaniya, T. R. 1990: The washback effect of a textbook-based test . Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 1, 48-58 .

16.

McNamara, T. 1996: Measuring second language performance. Longman .

17.

Messick, S. 1996: Validity and washback in language testing . Language Testing 13, 241-256 .

18.

Morrow, K. 1986: The evaluation of tests of communicative performance. In Portal, M. , editor, Innovations in language testing. NFER Nelson , 1-13.

19.

Munby, J. 1981: Communicative syllabus design: a sociolinguistic model for defining the content of purpose-specific language programmes. Cambridge University Press .

20.

Pearson, I. 1988: Tests as levers for change. In Chamberlain, D. and Baumgardner, R. , editors, ESP in the classroom: practice and evaluation. ELT Document 128. Modern English Publications , 98-107.

21.

Saif, S. 2002: A needs-based approach to the evaluation of the spoken language ability of international teaching assistants . Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 5, 145-167 .

22.

Shohamy, E. 1992: Beyond proficiency testing: a diagnostic feedback testing model for assessing foreign language learning . The Modern Language Journal 76, 513-521 .

23.

Shohamy, E. , Donitsa-Schmidt, S. and Ferman, I. 1996: Test impact revisited: washback effect over time . Language Testing 13, 298-317 .

24.

Smith, J. , Meyers, C. and Burkhalter, A. 1992: Communicate: strategies for international teaching assistants. Regents/Prentice Hall .

25.

Swain, M. 1985: Large-scale communicative testing. In Lee, Y. P. , Fok, A. C. C. Y. , Lord, R. and Low, G. , editors, New directions in language testing. Pergamon , 35-46.

26.

Turner, C. E. 2001: The need for impact studies of L2 performance testing and rating: identifying areas of potential consequences at all levels of the testing cycle. In Elder, C. , Brown, A. , Grove, E. , Hill, K. , Iwashita, N. , Lumley, T. , McNamara, T. and O’Loughlin, K. , editors, Experimenting with uncertainty: essays in honour of Alan Davies. Cambridge University Press , 138-149.

27.

Vernon, P. E. 1956: The measurement of abilities. University of London Press .

28.

Wall, D. 2000: The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: can this be predicted or controlled ? System 28, 499-509 .

29.

Wall, D. and Alderson, J. C. 1993: Examining washback: the Sri Lankan impact study . Language Testing 10, 41-69 .

30.

Watanabe, Y. 1996: Investigating washback in Japanese EFL classrooms: problems of methodology. In Wigglesworth, G. and Elder, C. , editors, Australian review of applied linguistics. Series S 13. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia , 208-239.

31.

Wiseman, S. 1961: The efficiency of examinations. In Wiseman, S. , editor, Examinations and English education. Manchester University Press .

Aiming for positive washback: a case study of international teaching assistants

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References