Book Review: Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press,Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online October, 2003
Book Review: Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press,Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests
Alderson, J. C.1981: Report of the discussion on General Language
Pro-ficiency. In
Alderson, J. C.
and
Hughes, A.
, editors, Issues in language testing. ELT Documents 111.
London: British Council
, 187-194.
2.
Bachman, L. F.1990: Fundamental considerations in language testing.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
3.
Bachman, L. F.2002:
Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment
. Language Testing19,
453-476
.
4.
Bachman, L. F.
in press: Statistics for language testing.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
5.
Bachman, L. F.
and
Palmer, A. S.1996: Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful
language tests.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
6.
Brindley, G.1998:
Outcomes-based assessment and reporting in language programs: a review of
the issues
. Language Testing15,
45-85
.
7.
Brindley, G.2001:
Outcomes-based assessment in practice: some examples and emerging insights
. Language Testing18,
393-407
.
8.
Canale, M.1983: From communicative competence to communicative language
pedagogy. In
Richards, J. C.
and
Schmidt, R. W.
, editors, Language and communication.
London: Longman
, 2-27.
9.
Canale, M.
and
Swain, M.1980:
Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching
and testing
. Applied Linguistics1,
1-47
.
10.
Candlin, C. N.
1986:
Explaining communicative competence: limits of testability?
In
Stansfield, C. W.
, editor, Toward communicative competence testing: proceedings of the
Second TOEFL Invitational Conference. TOEFL Research Report 21.
Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service,
38-57
.
11.
Chapelle, C.1994:
Are C-tests valid measures for L2 vocabulary research?Second Language Research10,
157-187
.
12.
Chapelle, C.1998: Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA
research. In
Bachman, L. F.
and
Cohen, A. D.
, editors, Interfaces between second language acquisition and language
testing research.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
, 32-70.
13.
Chapelle, C.1999:
Validity in language assessment
. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics19,
1-19
.
14.
Council of Europe
. 2001: Common European framework of reference for languages:
learning, teaching and assessment.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
15.
Davies, A.1977: The construction of language tests. In
Allen, J. P. B.
and
Davies, A.
, editors, Testing and experimental methods. The Edinburgh Course in
Applied Linguistics. Volume 4.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
, 38-104.
16.
Eades, D.
,
Fraser, H.
,
Siegel, J.
,
McNamara, T.
and
Baker, B.2003:
Linguistic identification in the determination of nationality: a
preliminary report
. Language Policy2,
179-199
. Available at
http://wwwpersonal.une.edu.au/%7Ehfraser/forensic/LingID.pdf (accessed
May 2003).
17.
Halliday, M. A. K.1978: Language as social semiotic. The social interpretation of
language and meaning.
London: Edward Arnold
.
18.
Hymes, D. H.1972: On communicative competence. In
Pride, J. B.
and
Holmes, J.
, editors, Sociolinguistics: selected readings.
Harmondsworth: Penguin
, 269-293.
19.
Kane, M.1992:
An argument-based approach to validity
. Psychological Bulletin112,
527-535
.
20.
Kane, M.
,
Crooks, T.
and
Cohen, A.1999:
Validating measures of performance
. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice18,
5-17
.
21.
Lado, R.1961: Language testing: the construction and use of foreign language
tests.
London: Longmans Green and Co.
22.
Lowe, P.1982: ILR handbook on oral interview testing.
Washington, DC: Defense Language Institute/CIA
Language School
.
23.
McNamara, T. F.1996: Measuring second language performance.
London and New York: Addison-Wesley Longman
.
24.
McNamara, T. F.1997:
‘Interaction’ in second language performance
assessment: whose performance?Applied Linguistics18,
446-466
.
25.
Messick, S.1989: Validity. In
Linn, R.
, editor, Educational measurement. Third edition.
New York: Macmillan
, 13-103.
26.
Mislevy, R. J.1996:
Test theory reconceived
. Journal of Educational Measurement33,
379-416
.
27.
Mislevy, R. J.
,
Steinberg, L. S.
and
Almond, R. G.2002:
Design and analysis in task-based language assessment
. Language Testing19,
477-496
.
28.
Mislevy, R. J.
,
Steinberg, L. S.
and
Almond, R. G.2003:
On the structure of assessment arguments
. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives1,
3-62
.
29.
Shohamy, E.1988:
A proposed framework for testing the oral language of second/foreign
language learners
. Studies in Second Language Acquisition10,
165-179
.
30.
Shohamy, E.2001: The power of tests: a critical perspective on the uses of
language tests.
London: Pearson
.
31.
Weir, C. J.1983: The Associated Examining Board’s Test in English
for Academic Purposes: an exercise in content validation. In
Hughes, A.
and
Porter, D.
, editors, Current developments in language testing.
London: Academic Press
.
32.
Widdowson, H. G.2001: Communicative language testing: the art of the
possible. In
Elder, C.
,
Brown, A.
,
Grove, E.
,
Hill, K.
,
Iwashita, N.
,
Lumley, T.
,
McNamara, T.
and
O’Loughlin, K.
, editors, Experimenting with uncertainty: essays in honour of Alan
Davies. Studies in Language Testing 11.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
, 12-21.
