Pressure transient control: Part I — criteria for transient analysis and control

Abstract

Pressure transient propagation is a wholly natural consequence of any change in operating conditions for a fluid carrying system. Rapid changes in flow conditions generate surge conditions that may result in system failure. The analysis of these phenomena has progressed over the past 100 years from empirical research aimed at the protection of large-scale pipeline and plant networks to the development of computing simulations to support system design. Pressure surge analysis is therefore a consideration in the design and operation of all fluid systems: the objective of such an analysis being the prediction, control and suppression of transients. This paper presents the background to the development of surge alleviation, from traditional pipeline protection to applications within building drainage and vent systems, thereby stressing that the system failure consequences of transient propagation are dependent on the particular system, independent of absolute surge pressure, and that system protection criteria may be developed that apply regardless of the system or the severity of the transient.

Practical application: The control of air pressure transients in building drainage systems has been limited due to the need to attenuate positive pressure propagation via an open termination at roof level - a poor solution as the transient will have affected all system trap seals before reaching the relief vent. The Positive Air Pressure Attenuator - an expandable bag that controls the rate of change of entrained airflow within the system - reduces the possibility of trapseal loss due to positive transient propagation. Potentially this is a major contribution to vent system design that could revolutionize 150 years of design methodology.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Joukowsky N . Uber den hydraulisher Stoss in Wasser lietungsrohren. Memoirs de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St Petersburgh 1900 (Translated by O Simin as Waterhammer.) Procs. AWWA 1990; 24: 341-424.

Korteweg DJ. Uber die Fortphlanzungsgeschindigkeit des Schalles in elastisches Rohren. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 1878; 5 Floge, Band 5.

Allievi MB . Notes 1-IV, translated as The theory of waterhammer, Holmes E.E. Ricardo Garoni, Rome, 1925.

Schnyder O . Waterhammer in pump discharge lines, Schweizerische Bauxeitung, 1929; 94: no 22,23-23.

Bergeron L. Etudes des variations de regime dans les conduits d'eau, Rev. Gen. Hydraulique No 1 and 2. (also Waterhammer in hydraulics and wave surges in electricity). New York: John Wiley, 1935: 250.

Lister M . The numerical solution of hyperbolic partial differential equations by the method of characteristics. In: Ralston and Wilf eds. Mathematical methods for digital computers. New York: John Wiley, 1960: 165-179.

Gray CAM . Analysis of the dissipation of energy in waterhammer. Procs. ASCE 1953; 119: Paper 274, 1176-1194.

Fox JA . The use of digital computers in the solution of waterhammer problems. Proc. ICE 1968; 39: 127-131.

Streeter VL , Lai C . Waterhammer analysis including fluid friction. J. Hyd. Div ASCE 1962; 128: 1491-1552.

10.

Doyle T , Swaffield JA . Evaluation of the method of characteristics applied to a pressure transient analysis of the B.A.C./S.N.A.I.S. Concorde refuelling system. Proc. I. Mech E. 1972; 186: 509-518.

11.

Thorley ARD , Twyman JWR . Propagation of transient pressure waves in a sodium cooled fast reactor. second International Conference on Pressure Surge, BHRA London, 1976: A2-1521.

12.

Lawson JD , O'Neill IC , Graze HR . Pressure surge in fire services in tall buildings. Proceedings First Australasian Conference on Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1963: 353-368.

13.

Hope P , Papworth MU . Fire main failure due to rapid priming of dry lines. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Pressure Surge, BHRA, Cranfield, 1980: 381-390.

14.

Fox JA , Henson DA . The prediction of the magnitude of pressure transients generated by a train entering a single tunnel. Proc. I.C.E. 1971; 49: 53-69.

15.

Swaffield JA , Campbell DP . Numerical modelling of air pressure transient propagation in building drainage systems, including the influence of mechanical boundary conditions. Building and Environment 1992; 27: 455-467.

16.

BHRA British Hydromechanics Research Association, now BHr , Pressure Surge Conferences, 1972 to 2000. Cranfield.

17.

Swaffield JA , Maxwell-Standing K . Improvements in the application of the numerical method of characteristics to predict attenuation in unsteady partially filled pipe flow. Journal of Research, National Bureau of Standards, Washington DC. 1986; 91: 149-156.

18.

Swaffield JA , Galowin LS . The engineered design of building drainage systems. Ashgate: Aldershot, 1992: 405-405.

19.

Goldberg DE , Wylie EB . Characteristics method using time-line interpolations. J. Hyd. Div. A.S.C.E. 1983; 109: no 5-5.

20.

Swaffield JA , Escarameia M , Campbell DP . (1999) Unsteady gutter flow: development and application of simulation. Procs. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, Series A: Building Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 1999; 20: 29-40.

21.

Ballanco JA . Investigation and analysis of violently fracturing water closets. Technical Proceedings ASPE 1998 Convention, Indianapolis, October 1998: 109-150.

22.

Swaffield JA , Ballanco J , McDougall JA . Pressure surge in building utility services exacerbated by the presence of trapped or entrained air. Building Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2002; 23: 179-196.