The Three-Year Incidence of Major Hemorrhage among Older Adults Initiating Chronic Dialysis

Abstract

French

Background:

For those who initiate chronic dialysis, knowing what proportion will experience 3-year outcomes of hemorrhage with hospitalization informs patient prognosis, disease impact, and the planning of trials and programs to prevent events.

Objectives:

We examined the incidence of hemorrhage and related gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures in incident older dialysis patients and stratified patients by age, era, dialysis modality and whether recently prescribed anti-thrombotic medication.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study

Setting:

Ontario, Canada from 1998 to 2008 (n = 11,173)

Patients:

All older patients (>65 years) who initiated chronic dialysis

Measurements:

Hospitalization with hemorrhage and its subtypes (upper and lower gastrointestinal, intra-cerebral, subarachnoid) and related-gastrointestinal procedures.

Methods:

Three-year outcomes of hospitalization with hemorrhage were expressed as cumulative incidence and incidence rate (number of events per 1,000 patient years). Results were stratified by patient age (66 to 74, 75 to 84, ≥ 85), era (1998 to 2001, 2002 to 2005, 2006 to 2008) and dialysis modality. Among those with hemorrhage, we examined prescriptions for anti-thrombotic medications (warfarin, clopidogrel) in the preceding 120 days.

Results:

The 3-year cumulative incidence of hemorrhage was 14.4% (roughly 1 in 7 patients). By location, the 3-year cumulative incidence was 8.9% lower gastrointestinal, 6.1% upper gastrointestinal, 0.9% intra-cerebral and 0.1% sub arachnoid hemorrhage. The 3-year cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures was 14.8%. The cumulative incidence and rate of hemorrhage were not appreciably different across the 3 age strata, by era or by dialysis modality. Among patients with a hemorrhage, 29.5% were prescribed warfarin in the preceding 120 days, and 8.4% clopidogrel.

Limitations:

Recurrent events were not included.

Conclusions:

Many older patients who initiate chronic dialysis will be hospitalized with hemorrhage and receive related procedures over the subsequent three years. Despite greater age and co-morbidity over the last decade this incidence has not changed.

What was known before

Dialysis patients are known to experience a significant risk of hemorrhagic events. Accurate determination of the risk has been difficult due to variations in the definition of hemorrhage and the use of non-validated diagnostic codes in previous studies. Further it remains unclear if or to what magnitude the hemorrhagic risk changes with increasing age and over time.

What this adds

We found that one in seven patients (14.43%) will experience a hospitalization with a hemorrhage within the first three years of initiating dialysis and this high risk did not increase with age or improve over time.

Background

Patients who initiate chronic dialysis are older, have more co-morbid illness than a decade prior, and subsequently may experience more hospitalizations in follow-up. Hemorrhages are one of most common hospital admission diagnoses in the end-stage renal disease population and contribute significant morbidity and mortality [1]. Compared to the general population, the incidence of hemorrhage is considerably higher in those receiving dialysis with rates ranging from 35.4 to 80 per 1000-patient years (which is contingent on the study design, the definition used, method of outcome ascertainment and concurrent use of anti-thrombotic medications such as clopidogrel or warfarin) [2,3].

In the non-dialysis population, the incidence of hemorrhagic events has been declining over the last two decades, attributed to the widespread use of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, treatments for H.pylori-related ulcers and the use of proton pump inhibitors [4 –8]. In an American dialysis population, the incidence of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding had not changed over the last decade despite increasing patient comorbidity [9,10]. It is unknown whether the same is true in other jurisdictions, or applies to other types of bleeding (lower gastrointestinal, intracranial bleeding) or related procedures (gastrointestinal endoscopy). Furthermore, the risk of bleeding appears to increase with advancing age [7]. In the non-CKD, non-dialysis population, hospitalizations for UGI hemorrhage per 100, 000 population increased dramatically with age (<65 31.7, 66 to 75 197.4, > 75 425.2) with a similar trend observed for lower GI hemorrhage. As the average age of incident dialysis patients is increasing over time, it follows that there may a parallel rise in the risk of major hemorrhage [11]. Lastly, the hemorrhagic risk may differ based on the dialysis modality as patients on peritoneal and hemodialysis are well known to differ based on co-morbidities, exposures (to heparin with the hemodialysis procedure) and functional status.

In this study we examined older adults who initiated chronic dialysis in Ontario, Canada over a ten-year period to determine the 3-year cumulative incidence and incidence rate (per 1000 person years) of hemorrhage and related gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. We further examined hemorrhage incidence across three age (66 to 74, 75 to 84, ≥85), era (1998 to 2001, 2002 to 2005, 2006 to 2008) and dialysis modality (peritoneal, hemodialysis) and considered whether patients with hemorrhagic events were recently prescribed anti-thrombotic medication.

Methods

Study design and setting

We conducted a population-based study of all older adults who initiated chronic dialysis in Ontario, Canada between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2008 using linked health care databases. Ontario has approximately 13 million residents, 14% of whom are 65 years of age or older [12]. Residents have universal access to hospital care and physician services and those 65 years of age or older have universal prescription drug coverage. All healthcare encounters are entered in administrative databases and are held in a linked, de-identified form at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). We conducted this study according to a pre-specified protocol that was approved by the research ethics board at Sunny-brook Health Sciences Centre (Toronto, Canada). The reporting of this study followed guidelines for observational studies [13] (Additional file 1: Table S1). Regional ethics approval was obtained.

Data sources

We ascertained patient characteristics, drug use, covariate information, and outcome data using records from five linked databases. We identified patients initiating chronic dialysis in Ontario through the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry (CORR) [11]. CORR is a national dialysis registry with information collected from all dialysis facilities in Canada on incident chronic dialysis patients [14,15]. The recorded information includes dialysis modality and the type of vascular access. We obtained vital statistics from the Ontario Registered Persons Database which contains demographic information on all Ontario residents who have ever been issued a health card. We used the Ontario Drug Benefit Plan database to identify prescription drug use. This database contains highly accurate records of all outpatient prescriptions dispensed to patients aged 65 or older, with an error rate of less than 1% [16]. We identified diagnostic and procedural information on all hospitalizations from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI-DAD). We obtained information from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan database, which includes health claims for inpatient and outpatient physician services. Previously, we have used these databases to research renal health outcomes and health services [17 –19]. Whenever possible, we defined patient characteristics, dialysis characteristics and outcomes using database codes that have been proven reliable when compared with manual chart review (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Patients

We studied patients who initiated chronic dialysis therapy within our 10 year accrual period. CORR captures patients who require chronic dialysis therapy; their date of dialysis initiation served as the index date (also referred to as the cohort entry date). We excluded the following people from analysis: i) those without at least one year of eligibility for prescription drug coverage (age less than 66) to avoid incomplete medication records, ii) those with a prior history of kidney transplantation or prior chronic dialysis, to focus on incident end-stage renal disease treated with chronic dialysis and iii) those who initiated chronic dialysis during a hospital stay and died prior to hospital discharge.

Known demographics and co-morbid risk factors for hemorrhage were recorded including age, hypertension, prior major hemorrhage [20], diabetes, cardiovascular disease including prior myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation in the five years preceding dialysis initiation. Antithrombotic therapy (warfarin, clopidogrel) was captured in the 30 and 120 days preceding the hemorrhagic event. In Ontario, acetyl-salicylic acid (ASA) is often available without a prescription and thus would not be captured in the Ontario Drug Benefit Plan.

Outcomes

All individuals were followed for three years after the initiation of chronic dialysis for the outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was the first hospitalization with non-traumatic major hemorrhage, a composite outcome defined by any of the following: upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage, intra-cerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The secondary outcome was each specific subtype of hemorrhage and all gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures that occurred during the hospital stay.

The components of non-traumatic major hemorrhage were specifically selected based on prior validation studies and the severity of each event [21,22]. Previous studies have reported positive predictive values of 90–98% for each of the specific subtypes of hemorrhage we used as secondary outcomes [21,22]. Non-validated hemorrhages, such as those associated with vascular access, and non-severe hemorrhages (e.g. epistaxis) were excluded. Gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures included gastroscopy, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, duodenoscopy, & esophagoscopy. Hospitalizations for outcomes were identified using the International Classification for Disease (ICD), 9 and 10 codes (Additional file 1: Table S3).

Statistical analysis

The study period was categorized into three eras: 1998–2001, 2002–2005, 2006–2008, three age groups: 66–74, 75–84 and ≥85 years of age and dialysis modality (peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis). Differences between baseline characteristics were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-squared tests. We determined frequencies and calculated a modified Charlson comorbidity index for all patients at baseline by era [23].

We calculated the three-year cumulative incidence of hemorrhagic events (defined as the proportion of patients who experienced the event at least once within the three-years of follow-up in percent) and three-year incidence rates (defined as the rate per 1,000 person-years of follow-up). For the primary outcome, patients were censored at the time of their first hemorrhagic event, death or end of follow-up period whereas for the secondary outcome of subtypes of hemorrhage or related-procedures, patients were censored only after the specific subtype of hemorrhage or related-procedure occurred, death or the end of the follow-up period. This allowed us to determine the specific subtype or related procedure incidence. Primary results were stratified by era (1998 to 2001, 2002 to 2005, and 2006 to 2008), age category (65–74, 75–84, ≥85) and dialysis modality. Trends were examined using the Cochrane-Armitage test. We examined whether patients with hemorrhage were prescribed anti-thrombotic medications (warfarin, clopidogrel) in the 30 days and 120 days preceding their hemorrhagic event. Of note, the three-year cumulative incidence does not account for time at risk, representing simply a proportion of events achieved with 3 years. In this regard, the incidence rate was also calculated.

Results

Our final study cohort included 11, 173 incident chronic dialysis patients comprising 19,894.2 patient-years of follow-up with the average follow-up per person of 677 days (see cohort development Additional file 1: Figure S1). Baseline characteristics by era and age are presented in Table 1. Most patients were Caucasian (versus other races) and initiated hemodialysis (>80% of the cohort, versus peritoneal dialysis). A history of atrial fibrillation and hemorrhage were common in the older age groups. Patients who initiated dialysis in more recent years (versus earlier years) were slightly older and had greater comorbidity. Prescriptions at dialysis initiation for warfarin were unchanged (mean 12.2%, p = 0.098) whereas clopidogrel significantly increased from 0.5 to 8.0% (p < 0.001) in the more recent era compared to earlier. Among comorbidities prior to dialysis initiation, hemorrhage, acute coronary syndrome and the presence of a mechanical heart valve were more common in the recent era.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients initiating chronic dialysis in Ontario, Canada from 1998 to 2008

		Era, year of dialysis initiation				Patient age, years

Characteristics	Total	1998–2001	2002–2005	2006–2008	p-value	65–74	75–84	≥85	p-value
	n = 11,173	n = 3,837	n =4,231	n = 3,105
Age, mean ± SD	75.8 ± 6.2	74.8 ± 5.8	76.1 ± 6.2	76.5 ± 6.43	<0.001
Women,%	42.3	42.3	42.0	42.6	0.873	41.6	42.5	44.2	0.286
Race,%
Caucasian	77.0	70.0	80.7	80.7	<0.001	73.9	79.4	80.5	<0.001
East Asian	6.2	6.6	6.1	5.8		5.9	6.2	7.6
South Asian	3.0	2.6	3.1	3.5		4.1	2.4	0.7
Aboriginal	1.1	1.1	1.0	1.2		1.7	0.6	0.4
Other	4.9	4.4	5.1	5.1		6.2	3.8	3.5
Unknown	7.9	15.5	4.0	3.6		8.1	7.7	7.4
Modality,%
Hemodialysis	81.4	78.5	82.3	80.4	<0.001	77.6	82.8	83.4	<0.001
Peritoneal dialysis	19.5	21.5	17.7	19.6		22.4	17.2	16.6
Medication*,%
Clopidogrel	4.5	0.5	5.6	8.0	<0.001	4.3	4.7	4.8	0.571
Warfarin	12.2	11.8	11.9	13.3	0.098	10.6	13.5	13.9	<0.001
Co-morbidity,%
Atrial fibrillation	14.7	14.0	15.3	14.9	0.258	12.2	16.6	17.8	<0.001
Stroke	5.0	5.8	5.0	4.0	0.003	5.2	4.9	4.5	0.514
Prior Major hemorrhage	10.1	8.9	10.1	11.7	<0.001	10.0	9.8	12.4	0.039
Acute coronary syndrome	13.6	12.7	14.7	13.2	0.026	1.8	2.1	1.8	0.588
Deep vein thrombosis & pulmonary embolism	1.9	1.8	1.8	2.3	0.202	1.8	2.1	1.8	0.588
Mechanical heart valve	1.3	0.9	1.4	1.5	0.022	1.5	1.2	0.3	0.009
Modified Charlson Co-morbidity Index‡,%
2	27.4	27.7	26.7	28.0	<0.001	26.8	27.5	30.2	<0.001
3	13.9	17.5	12.9	10.9		12.2	14.7	18.2
4	19.0	20.1	17.3	19.9		18.6	19.0	20.9
≥5	39.7	34.7	43.0	41.2		42.4	38.8	30.6

Medication was based on evidence of medication prescription at dialysis initiation.

‡

We used a modified Charlson Index that gave each individual on dialysis an automatic two-points for moderate-to-severe kidney disease.

Three-year cumulative incidence and event rate of hemorrhage

The three-year cumulative incidence of hemorrhage was 14.43% with an event rate of 52.64 per 1000 person years (see Table 2). By site of bleeding, the cumulative incidence and event rates were highest for lower gastrointestinal (8.88% and 31.21 per 1000 person years) followed by upper gastrointestinal (6.06% and 20.94 per 1000 person years), intra-cerebral (0.85% and 2.85 per 1000 person years) and subarachnoid (0.10% and 0.33 per 1000 person years). The three-year cumulative incidence and event rate for the receipt of gastrointestinal endoscopy (upper, lower) was 14.86% and 54.45 per 1000 person years of patients. Patients with hemorrhage at more than one anatomical location occurred in 162 cases (1.45%).

Table 2

3-year cumulative incidence and incidence rates per 1,000 person year of total hemorrhages and hemorrhage subtypes

	Total hemorrhage¹	Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage²	Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage²	Intra-cerebral hemorrhage²	Subarachnoid hemorrhage²	Gastrointestinal endoscopy³
N = 11,173	1612	992	677	95	11	1660
3-year cumulative incidence (%)	14.43	8.88	6.06	0.85	0.10	14.86
Event rate (per 1000 patient-years)	52.64	31.21	20.94	2.85	0.33	54.45

Counted as the first major hemorrhage at any anatomical location.

Counted as the first hemorrhage at this anatomical location.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy included gastroscopy, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, duodenoscopy & esophagoscopy, when the procedure occurred during hospital stay.

Age and the three-year cumulative incidence and event rate of hemorrhage

The 3-year cumulative incidence and event rate for hemorrhage was similar across age groups (see Figure 1). They were highest in those 75–84 years of age (14.55%, 53.23 per 1000 person years) and lowest in those ≥ 85 years of age (13.95%, 50.78 per 1000 person years). Individuals ≥ 85 years of age had the highest 3-year cumulative incidence of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage (9.30%, 32.85 per 1000 person years) and lowest incidence of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (5.04%, 17.3 per 1000 person years) and intra-cerebral hemorrhage (0.58%, 1.94 per 1000 person years). Individuals' ≥ 85 years of age underwent substantially fewer gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (9.59%, 34.14 per 1000 person years, p = 0.005) than those in the other 2 age categories.

Figure 1

3-year cumulative incidence rate of all hemorrhage, its subtypes and related-endoscopy, stratified by age groups.

Secular trends in the rates of hemorrhage

The 3-year cumulative incidence rates and event rates (per 1000 person years) of hemorrhage were consistent across time periods and varied from 14.15 to 14.36% and 51.57 to 52.29 (see Table 3). The highest 3-year cumulative incidence and event rate for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage was seen in 2002–2005 (9.08%, 31.97 per 1000 patient-years). In the same era, the 3-year cumulative incidence and event rate for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage was lowest (5.91%, 20.41 per 1000 patient-years). The 3-year cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures ranged from 15.66 to 14.94% and was steady over time (p = 0.34). Intra-cerebral hemorrhages increased from 0.70 to 0.97%, p = 0.23 whereas the 3 year cumulative incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage was relatively low.

Table 3

Secular trends of the 3-year cumulative incidence (%) and event rates of hemorrhage (per 1000 person years), its subtypes, related endoscopy and all-cause mortality

Outcome		Total	1998–2001	2002–2005	2006–2008	P value
Total hemorrhage	3-yr incidence	14.43	14.15	14.72	14.36	0.78
	Event rate	52.64	51.57	53.87	52.29
Upper gastrointestinal	3-yr incidence	6.06	6.12	5.91	6.18	0.95
	Event rate	20.94	21.19	20.41	21.33
Lower gastrointestinal	3-yr incidence	8.88	8.84	9.08	8.66	0.83
	Event rate	31.21	31.01	31.97	30.42
Intra-cerebral	3-yr incidence	0.85	0.70	0.90	0.97	0.23
	Event rate	2.85	2.35	3.01	3.24
Subarachnoid	3-yr incidence	0.10	0.05	0.14	0.10	0.51
	Event rate	0.33	0.17	0.47	0.32
Gastrointestinal endoscopy	3-yr incidence	14.86	15.66	14.06	14.94	0.34
	Event rate	54.45	57.76	51.36	54.61

Dialysis modality and three-year cumulative incidence and event rate of hemorrhage

The three-year cumulative incidence and event rate for total hemorrhage and its subtypes were all lower among peritoneal dialysis patients compared to hemodialysis however the differences were not statistically significant (see Table 4). Patients on peritoneal dialysis did undergo more gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures than patients on hemodialysis (17.84 vs. 14.13%, p < 0.0001).

Table 4

Total 3-year cumulative incidence and event rates of hemorrhage (per 1,000 person years), its subtypes, and related endoscopy stratified by dialysis modality

Outcome		Total		P value

		Hemodialysis	Peritoneal dialysis
Total hemorrhage	3-yr incidence	14.63%	13.58%	0.21
	Event rate	53.37	48.86
Upper gastrointestinal	3-yr incidence	6.09%	5.92%	0.76
	Event rate	21.07	20.38
Lower gastrointestinal	3-yr incidence	9.04%	8.21%	0.22
	Event rate	31.85	28.59
Intra-cerebral	3-yr incidence	0.88%	0.73%	0.51
	Event rate	2.94	2.45
Subarachnoid	3-yr incidence	–	–
	Event rate	0.30	0.46
Gastrointestinal endoscopy	3-yr incidence	14.13%	17.84%	<0.0001
	Event rate	51.64	66.24

Note: 3-year cumulative incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage cell values were suppressed for the purposes of privacy and confidentiality.

3-year cumulative incidence and secular trends of hemorrhage and preceding prescription for anti-thrombotic medications

Among the 1,612 patients with hemorrhages, 4.20 and 8.37 were prescribed clopidogrel in the preceding 30 and 120 days (Table 5). Warfarin prescriptions occurred in 16.6 and 29.53% in the preceding 30 and 120 days. Just over half the hemorrhagic events observed occurred within 30 days of prescription of either drug. Clopidrogrel prescription prior to major bleeding increased over time from 1998–2001 to 2006–2008 (p < 0.001) and during the same time period, warfarin prescription declined 120 days prior to the event (p = 0.023). Co-prescription of both warfarin and clopidogrel in the period prior to a hemorrhage was relatively rare with a non-significant increase over time from 0.7% to 3.4% (p = 0.07).

Table 5

Secular trends of the proportion of patients who received an anti-thrombotic medication prescription 30 and 120 days preceding a hemorrhagic event

Medication	Total	1998–2001	2002–2005	2006–2008	P value
Clopidogrel (30 days)	4.2%	1.7%	4.3%	7.0%	<0.001
Clopidogrel (120 days)	8.4%	2.6%	9.3%	14.1%	<0.001
Warfarin (30 days)	16.6%	17.5%	17.5%	14.3%	0.316
Warfarin (120 days)	29.5%	33.3%	29.2%	25.3%	0.023
Warfarin + Clopidogrel (120 days)	1.8%	0.7%	1.6%	3.4%	0.072

Discussion

In this population-level study of older incident dialysis patients in Ontario, Canada, the 3-year cumulative incidence of hospitalization with hemorrhage was 14.43% or one in seven patients. The most common site of bleeding was lower gastrointestinal followed by upper gastrointestinal, intra-cerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage, and many patients received an endoscopic procedure during their hospital admission. The incidence of hemorrhage was stable across age groups, over time, by dialysis modality and elevated among those recently prescribed anti-thrombotic medications. Among incident dialysis patients, the burden of hemorrhage is high and population-specific interventions are warranted.

Our finding of a high incidence of hemorrhage among incident dialysis patients with an observed rate of 52.64 per 1,000 person years is consistent with previous studies [2,3,24]. In prior large dialysis cohort studies event rates have ranged from 35.4 to 80 per 1,000 person-years [2,3]. Differences in the reported rates are attributable to variations in the definition of hemorrhage and inclusion criteria of individual studies. Olsen et al. examined hemorrhage requiring hospitalization in patients with atrial fibrillation and included urinary tract and airway hemorrhage [3]. Sood et al. reported an event rate of 80/1000 patient-years for hemorrhage with hospitalization with a broader definition including epistaxis, vascular access-related hemorrhage and subdural hematoma, and the study cohort included both incident and prevalent dialysis patients [2]. Of note the Canadian dialysis population may differ from international counterparts with relatively higher use of central venous catheters and warfarin all of which may impact the risk of hemorrhage [2,11].

As our rate estimates were determined in incident dialysis patients, they could serve to inform patients of their risk prior to dialysis initiation. The ability to quantitate risk of dialysis-related complications prior to dialysis initiation is increasingly important with the shift in demographics of the dialysis population to the elderly and need to balance quantity and quality of life. We further calculated the three-year cumulative incidence of hemorrhage as it may be a simple and meaningful way to communicate risk and understand disease burden from a patient perspective [25]. We found a 3-year cumulative incidence of 14.43% thus roughly 1 in 7 elderly dialysis patients will experience a hemorrhage requiring hospitalization within 3 years of dialysis initiation. This could be used in pre-dialysis discussions with patients to help them understand the risks of complications after dialysis initiation.

Among the specific subtypes of hemorrhagic events, we found upper and lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage (both well validated definitions of hemorrhage) to be the most common and roughly twenty to one hundred-fold higher in the elderly dialysis population compared to the general population [6,26,27]. Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage has been previously reported in large US ESRD cohorts ranging from 23–57 per 1,000 person-years [10,28]. This is comparable to our rate of 20.94 per 1000 patient-years. Similarly, subarachnoid hemorrhage and intra-cerebral hemorrhage were found to occur at rates 3- to 10- fold higher in the dialysis population compared to those reported in the general population [29]. The rate of subarachnoid hemorrhage among those with ESRD was recently reported as 3-fold higher in the US compared to our study (0.74 vs. 0.33 per 1000-patient years) [29]. Differences among the rates may be attributable to a higher prevalence of associated risk factors (such as women US: 56.3% vs Canada: 42.3% and African Americans US: 25.7% vs Canada <5%) [29].

The risk of hemorrhage was stable over time, by age group and dialysis modality. The steady temporal trends have been reported in the US dialysis populations for upper gastrointestinal and subarachnoid hemorrhage, however, the comparable risk across age groups to our knowledge has not been previously reported [10,29]. The stable temporal trends in the dialysis population are in contrast to the general population where GI and SAH have been reported to be declining steadily over the last two decades [6,30]. This has been attributed to advances in prevention (acid suppressing medications) or related risk factors (hypertension treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage) in the general population. Yet it remains unclear whether therapies are effective or treatment targets are similar or comparable in the dialysis population. The stable risk of hemorrhage with advancing age is reassuring and again provides important prognostic information for the elderly initiating dialysis. Of note, the absence of an increase in hemorrhagic events in the elderly may reflect a selection bias as elderly patients who are less likely to experience a hemorrhagic event may also be more apt to choose dialysis therapy over conservative treatments. Surprisingly despite similar hemorrhage rates, individuals ≥ 85 were much less likely to receive related endoscopic procedures (p = 0.005). Although the specific reasons for not performing endoscopic procedures were unknown, there is an increased risk of complications, often due to the bowel preparation or anesthetics, with advancing age and frailty [31]. The hemorrhagic risk appears to be similar based on dialysis modalities with the only difference detected being in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. It should be noted that the two cohorts are known to differ significantly in terms of demographics, co-morbidities, functionality and exposures [32]. These disparities were not accounted for in the present analysis and represent future areas on investigation.

A question of interest is the risk of hemorrhage with the use of anti-thrombotic medications [1,33 –35]. We observed a large number of hemorrhagic events occurring following a recent warfarin or clopidogrel prescription. Of concern, the incidence of hemorrhage associated with clopidogrel prescription use was trending upward during the study period. To date, there remains very little evidence for efficacy of these medications in dialysis patients aside from warfarin use for a recent or recurrent thrombus [36,37]. Despite the increase in prescriptions for clopidogrel associated with hemorrhagic events over time, there was no significant increase in total hemorrhagic events. Whether this represents possible selection bias, increased use of co-interventions or declines in hemorrhagic events among patients not treated with antithrombotics remains unknown.

Our study has a number of strengths. Our definition of hemorrhage was stringent and limited to severe events requiring hospitalization. Previous studies included surrogate measures of bleeding (such as blood transfusion), bleeding events managed in the outpatient setting and subtypes with limited clinical impact (epistaxis) [2,3,24]. We used well validated definitions for our outcomes and excluded those lacking validation (vascular access related bleeding). We determined a three-year follow-up to ensure estimates of hemorrhage incidence would be useful for sample size calculations in future clinical trials. As CORR captures nearly all incident dialysis patients in Canada, our findings are representative and generalizable.

Our study has some limitations. We did not include traumatic or peri-operative bleeding events. Medication prescription was obtained only in cross section at the initiation of dialysis or 120 days preceding an event, and did not account for medication continuation and discontinuation over time. We lacked information on ASA use or INR control among warfarin users. We did not account for recurrent events or events in prevalent dialysis patients which would have considerably increased our risk estimates. We did not have information regarding heparin-use during the hemodialysis procedure nor did we account for changes in modality over time.

Conclusion

Among incident dialysis patients are at high risk of hemorrhagic events requiring hospitalization. These events are stable over time, across age groups and by dialysis modality. Further studies of risk stratification for these events, and strategies to reduce these events, are needed.

Additional file

Additional file 1: Table S1. STROBE Statement. Table S2. Coding definitions for demographic and co-morbid conditions. Table S3. Outcome Definitions. Figure S1. Patient selection.

Footnotes

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

All authors contributed to the study design and review of the manuscript. MMS and AG drafted the first version of the manuscript. EM conducted the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Dr. Sood has served on advisory boards for Roche. Dr. Garg received an investigator-initiated grant from Astellas and Roche for a Canadian Institutes of Health Research study in living kidney donors and his institution received unrestricted research funding unrelated to this project from Pfizer.

This study was supported by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Western Site. ICES is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). ICES Western is funded by an operating grant from the Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario (AMOSO). This project was conducted with members of the provincial ICES Kidney, Dialysis, and Transplantation Research Program, which receives programmatic grant funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The opinions, results and conclusions are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES, AMOSO, CIHR, or the MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. Manish M Sood receives a salary support award from the Jindal research chair for the prevention of kidney disease.

The opinions, results and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent of the funding sources.

References

Sood

Komenda

Sood

Rigatto

Bueti

: The intersection of risk and benefit: Is warfarin anticoagulation suitable for atrial fibrillation in patients on hemodialysis? Chest 2009, 136(4):1128–1133.

Sood

Larkina

Thumma

Tentori

Gillespie

Fukuhara

Mendelssohn

Chan

de Sequera

Komenda

Rigatto

Robinson

: Major bleeding events and risk stratification of antithrombotic agents in hemodialysis: Results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int 2013, 84(3):600–608.

Olesen

Lip

GYH

Kamper

A-L

Hommel

Køber

Lane

Lindhardsen

Gislason

Torp-Pedersen

: Stroke and bleeding in atrial fibrillation with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2012, 367(7):625–635.

Gomes

Mamdani

Holbrook

Paterson

Hellings

Juurlink

: Rates of hemorrhage during warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation. Can Med Assoc J 2013, 185(2):E121–E127.

Ohmann

Imhof

Ruppert

Janzik

Vogt

Frieling

Becker

Neumann

Faust

Heiler

Haas

Jurisch

Wenzel

Normann

Bachmann

Delgadillo

Seidel

Franke

Lüthen

Yang

Reinhold

: Time-trends in the epidemiology of peptic ulcer bleeding. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005, 40(8):914–920.

van Leerdam

: Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008, 22(2):209–224.

Laine

Yang

Chang

S-C

Datto

: Trends for incidence of hospitalization and death due to GI complications in the United States from 2001 to 2009. Am J Gastroenterol 2012, 107(8):1190–1195.

Zuccaro

: Epidemiology of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008, 22(2):225–232.

Luo

J-C

Leu

H-B

Huang

K-W

Huang

C-C

Hou

M-C

Lin

H-C

Lee

: Incidence of bleeding from gastroduodenal ulcers in patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis. Can Med Assoc J 2011, 183(18):E1345–E1351.

10.

Yang

J-Y

Lee

T-C

Montez-Rath

Paik

Chertow

Desai

Winkelmayer

: Trends in acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012, 23(3):495–506.

11.

Canadian Institute for Health information: Treatment of End-Stage Organ Failure in Canada, 1999 to 2008—CORR 2010 Annual Report. Ottawa, Ontario: CIHI; 2010.

12.

Statistics Canada: Population by year, by province and territory (number) www.76.statscan.gc.ca: Statistics Canada. 2012, http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo02a-eng.htm.

13.

von Elm

Altman

Egger

Pocock

Gøtzsche

Vandenbroucke

: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007, 147(8):573–577.

14.

Canadian Institute for Health information: Data Quality Study on the Canadian Organ Replacement Register. Ottawa, Onatrio: CIHI; 2009.

15.

Moist

Richards

Miskulin

Lok

Yeates

Garg

Trpeski

Chapman

Amuah

Hemmelgarn

: A validation study of the canadian organ replacement register. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011, 6(4):813–818.

16.

Levy

O'Brien

Sellors

Grootendorst

Willison

: Coding accuracy of administrative drug claims in the Ontario Drug Benefit database. Can J Clin Pharmacol 2003, 10(2):67–71.

17.

Garg

Meirambayeva

Huang

Kim

Prasad

GVR

Knoll

Boudville

Lok

McFarlane

Karpinski

Storsley

Klarenbach

Lam

Thomas

Dipchand

Reese

Doshi

Gibney

Taub

Young

: Cardiovascular disease in kidney donors: Matched cohort study. BMJ 2012, 1(344):e1203.

18.

Kitchlu

Clemens

Gomes

Hackam

Juurlink

Mamdani

Manno

Oliver

Quinn

Suri

Wald

Yan

Garg

: Beta-blockers and cardiovascular outcomes in dialysis patients: A cohort study in Ontario, Canada. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012, 27(4):1591–1598.

19.

Lam

Jain

Hackam

Cuerden

Suri

Huo

Clark

Garg

: Results of a randomized controlled trial on statin use in dialysis patients had no influence on statin prescription. Kidney Int 2009, 76(11):1172–1179.

20.

Pisters

Lane

Nieuwlaat

de Vos

Crijns

HJGM

Lip

GYH

: A novel user-friendly score (has-bled) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: The euro heart survey. Chest 2010, 138(5):1093–1100.

21.

Arnason

Wells

van Walraven

Forster

: Accuracy of coding for possible warfarin complications in hospital discharge abstracts. Thromb Res 2006, 118(2):253–262.

22.

Kokotailo

Hill

: Coding of stroke and stroke risk factors using international classification of diseases, revisions 9 and 10. Stroke 2005, 36(8):1776–1781.

23.

Hemmelgarn

Manns

Quan

Ghali

: Adapting the charlson comorbidity index for use in patients with ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis 2003, 42(1):125–132.

24.

Holden

Harman

Wang

Holland

Day

: Major bleeding in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008, 3(1):105–110.

25.

Bonita

Kjellstrom

: Basic Epidemiology. 2nd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO) Press; 2006.

26.

Hernández-Díaz

Rodríguez

LAG

: Incidence of serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding/perforation in the general population: Review of epidemiologic studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2002, 55(2):157–163.

27.

Feinman

Haut

: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Surg Clin North Am 2014, 94(1):43–53.

28.

Wasse

Haimanot DLG

Ball

Kestenbaum

Seliger

Donald

Stehman-Breen

: Risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding among end-stage renal disease patients. Kidney Int 2003, 64:1455–1461.

29.

Sakhuja

Schold

Kumar

Katzan

Navaneethan

: Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in maintenance dialysis hospitalizations: Trends and outcomes. Stroke 2014, 45(1):71–76.

30.

Østbye

Levy

Mayo

: Hospitalization and case-fatality rates for subarachnoid hemorrhage in Canada from 1982 through 1991: The Canadian Collaborative Study Group of Stroke Hospitalizations. Stroke 1997, 28(4):793–798.

31.

Razavi

Gross

Katz

: Endoscopy in the elderly: Risks, benefits, and yield of common endoscopic procedures. Clin Geriatr Med 2014, 30(1):133–147.

32.

Perl

Wald

McFarlane

Bargman

Vonesh

Jassal

Moist

: Hemodialysis vascular access modifies the association between dialysis modality and survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011, 22(6):1113–1121.

33.

Sood

Komenda

Tangri

: Anticoagulation in patients with kidney disease: One size does not fit all. Thromb Res 2013, 131(6):469–471.

34.

Sood

Tangri

: Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2012, 367(22):2157–2159.

35.

Sood

Rigatto

Bueti

Lang

Miller

PonnamPalam

Reslerova

Sood

Komenda

: Thrice weekly warfarin administration in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009, 24(10):3162–3167.

36.

Hiremath

Holden

Fergusson

Zimmerman

: Antiplatelet medications in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review of bleeding rates. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009, 4(8):1347–1355.

37.

Miller

Sood

Reslerova

Komenda

Rigatto

Bueti

: Cardiovascular disease in end-stage renal disease: The challenge of assessing and managing cardiac disease in dialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 2010, 42(4):1007–1014.