Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) through oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and pepsin saliva measurements.

Design

Prospective uncontrolled study.

Methods

Patients with sleep disturbances and reflux symptoms underwent polysomnography, 24-h oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and saliva pepsin collections. The prevalence of LPR was investigated in OSA patients according to oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and pepsin measurements. A correlation analysis was performed between pH-monitoring findings, pepsin saliva levels, reflux symptom score-12 (RSS-12), reflux sign assessment (RSA), Apnea–Hypopnea Index (AHI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pichot and arousal findings.

Results

Thirty-seven patients completed the evaluations. LPR was detected in 34/37 (92%) and 29/34 (85%) patients at the oropharyngeal-pH monitoring and pepsin test, respectively. OSA was detected in 30 patients (81%). Among them, LPR was detected in 28/30 (93%) cases. Pharyngeal reflux events mainly occurred nighttime/supine in OSA patients. Both Ryan score and supine reflux time at pH < 6.5 were significantly associated with BMI and the RSA sub- and total scores (p < 0.02). Tongue-base hypertrophy score was positively associated with the number of micro-arousals (p = 0.027); the supine percent of pH < 6.5 (p = 0.030); morning (p = 0.030) and bedtime pepsin saliva measurements (p = 0.037). The bedtime pepsin saliva level was significantly associated with Ryan Score (p = 0.047); AHI (p = 0.017) and the sleep saturation < 90% time (p = 0.040). The saliva level of the morning pepsin was associated with a shortest paradoxical sleep phase (p = 0.013).

Conclusion

OSA patients may have high prevalence of pharyngeal reflux events at the oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and high pepsin saliva measurements. Oropharyngeal pH-monitoring should be useful for the correlation between reflux and sleep findings in OSA patients. Future large cohort controlled studies are needed to determine the prevalence of LPR in OSA and healthy individuals.

Keywords

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Otolaryngology pH monitoring Pepsin Sleep Apnea Laryngeal Voice Head neck Laryngology

Introduction

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is an inflammatory condition of the upper aerodigestive tract tissues related to direct and indirect effect of gastroduodenal content reflux, which induces morphological changes in the upper aerodigestive tract [1]. Because the deposit of pepsin induces inflammatory reaction in mucosa, reflux was suspected to be associated with many common inflammatory otolaryngological conditions, including Eustachian tube dysfunction and related otitis media [2], chronic rhinosinusitis [3], subglottic stenosis [4], tobacco-induced laryngopharyngitis [5], and nonfunctional laryngeal disorders [6]. An increasing number of studies reported the coexistence between LPR and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) but the exact prevalence of pharyngeal reflux events, the reflux profile of OSA patients and the potential association with sleep parameters remain unclear [7–9]. Precisely, a few studies investigated the occurrence of LPR in OSA patients through objective diagnostic tools such as hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing or oropharyngeal pH-monitoring [7]. However, the identification of LPR-OSA coexistence appears important to improve the management of patients. Indeed, some studies reported that OSA patients may have worse symptoms of LPR [9], while others showed a benefit of antireflux therapy in OSA patients, which is associated with an improvement in daytime sleepiness and a reduction in nocturnal reflux-related arousals [8].

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and laryngopharyngeal reflux in OSA patients through oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and pepsin saliva detection.

Methods

Forty-five adult patients with primary patient-reported sleep disturbances (fatigue, snoring) and LPR symptoms and findings [10] were prospectively recruited from April 2021 to March 2022 in Elsan Medical Center (Poitiers, France). The prevalence of LPR and OSA was assessed in patients through objective diagnostic tools. The LPR diagnosis consisted of > 1 pharyngeal reflux events at the oropharyngeal pH-testing. The diagnostic of OSA was considered according to the polysomnography (apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5) [11], while the LPR diagnosis was carried out with 24-h oropharyngeal pH-monitoring. The included patients underwent simultaneously 24-h oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and polysomnography (Cidelec LXe, Loire, France). Moreover, the saliva of patients was collected the day of the pH-testing in the morning (fasting) and at bedtime. Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy was proposed to patients with GERD-related symptoms and in elderly patients (> 55 years old) who are known to less feel GERD-symptoms [12]. The following exclusion criteria were considered: smoker, alcohol dependence, previous OSA antireflux therapy, neurological or psychiatric illness, head and neck malignancy, history of head and neck radiotherapy, history of gastroesophageal or upper digestive surgery, active seasonal allergies, asthma and inhaled corticosteroid use. The Elsan Ethics committee approved the study protocol (PPC France Nord-West, n°2020-A02789-30). The informed consent was obtained for all patients.

Clinical evaluations

The symptoms of reflux were evaluated with the Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12), which is a validated 12-item patient-reported outcome assessing symptom frequency, severity and their impact on patient quality-of-life. RSS-12 score > 11 is suggestive of LPR, exhibiting a sensitivity of 94.5% and a specificity of 86.2%.¹⁰ Reflux signs were evaluated with the Reflux Sign Assessment, which is a 61-point validated clinical instrument that assessed the presence and severity of oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal findings [13].

Oropharyngeal pH-monitoring

Patients with RSS-12 > 11 underwent 24-h oropharyngeal pH-monitoring (Restech Dx‐pH, Restech, San Diego, CA). The probe was placed in the oropharynx of fasting patient at 9:00 A.M. through a standardized and recommended method by the provider. According to a recent meta-analysis, the LPR diagnostic was based on the presence of > 1 pharyngeal reflux event [14]. The following data were collected from the analysis: total number of reflux event lasting > 5 min; Ryan score; pH total time below/at pH 6.5., 6.0, 5.5 and 5.0 in both upright and supine position.

Pepsin saliva measurement

Simultaneously to oropharyngeal pH-monitoring, the saliva of patients was collected twice: in the morning (fasting) and at bedtime. The first saliva sample was collected in the evening at the bedtime (the day before the removal of the pH testing probe). The second sample consisted of the morning saliva before the removal of the pH study probe. These both pepsin measurements allowed the investigation of association between saliva pepsin concentration and the occurrence of pharyngeal reflux events daytime and nighttime, simultaneously to the polysomnography. The saliva samples (Peptest®; RDBiomed Ltd., Hull, United Kingdom) were collected and the measurement of pepsin concentration was performed by a trained lab technician according to a standardized procedure reported in previous studies [15, 16]. The saliva pepsin concentration was measured with the Cube Reader® that detects pepsin down to 16 ng/mL. The test was considered as positive when the pepsin level reached ≥ 16 ng/mL [16].

Sleep findings

Polysomnography (PSG) was carried out at home during the 24-h pH-monitoring period with the Cidelec CID-LXe (Cidelec, Loire, France) that is composed of 20 channels. Patients fulfilled the French version of Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) [17] and the Pichot fatigue scale [18]. The following PSG data were extracted by a board-certified sleep physician using the Cidelec software (Cidelec v2.2.6., Loire, France): Apnea–Hypopnea Index (AHI; Chicago scoring system) [11]; total number of arousals; number of arousals/hour; % of time with O₂ saturation level < 90%; and the 4 sleep phases including the paradoxical sleep. OSA status was retrieved from the home sleep study findings considering an AHI ≥ 5 per hour as a positive OSA diagnosis. The degree of obstructive sleep apnea was rated regarding the report of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine based on the patient's AHI: mild (5–14 events/hour); moderate (15–30 events/hour); or severe (> 30 events/hour) [11].

Statistical methods

Statistical analyses were performed wirh the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS version 22,0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The relationships between pH study findings, pepsin saliva concentration, symptoms, signs and sleep findings were investigated through correlation analysis. A level of significance of p < 0.05 was used.

Results

Thirty-seven adult patients met the inclusion criteria and completed the evaluations (Fig. 1). The mean age of patients was 51.2 ± 13.5 years old. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.5 ± 6.1, ranging from 20 to 42 (Table 1). OSA was detected in 30 patients (81%), corresponding to 10, 12, and 8 mild, moderate and severe OSAS, respectively. LPR diagnostic was found at the oropharyngeal pH study in 34 patients (92%). Among patients with a contributive pepsin test, 29/34 (85%) reported a positive morning or bedtime pepsin test. The level of saliva pepsin was not available in 3 patients because the pepsin tests were not interpreted due to sticky saliva. One patient had only one readable pepsin test. The gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed in 16/37 patients (Table 1). Oropharyngeal pH-monitoring findings are available in Table 1. The reflux symptoms and findings of patients are described in Table 2. The mean RSS-12 was 60.6 ± 47.1. The mean RSA was 20.7 ± 7.8 (Table 2). The sleep features are reported in Table 3. The mean AHI was 19.9 ± 19.0 and ranged from 0 to 78. Patients reported a mean Epworth score of 8.3 ± 5.8, whereas the Pichot score was 11.1 ± 8.9. The data of sleep phases N1, N2, N3, and paradoxical sleep are reported in Table 3. The mean total number of arousals was 151.8 ± 129.4.

Fig. 1

Chart flow. The figure represents the flow chart (A) and the performed evaluations over the 24-h testing period (B)

Table 1

Epidemiological and clinical features of patients

Clinical features		Range
Age	51.2 ± 13.5	18–72
BMI	29.5 ± 6.1	20–42
Gender (F/M)	17/20	–
Gastrointestinal endoscopy	N = 16
Normal	1 (6)	–
Esophagitis	2 (13)	–
Hiatal hernia	14 (88)	–
LES insufficiency	15 (94)	–
Gastritis	0 (0)	–
Oropharyngeal pH study (m ± SD)
Ryan score (N < 6.8)	7.2 ± 9.0
Number of events pH < 6.5*	13.5 ± 7.3	0–33
Supine time of events pH < 6.5	71.4 ± 32.5	0–100
Upright time of events pH < 6.5	48.4 ± 28.8	0.86.8
Number of events pH < 6.0	11.0 ± 7.9	0–27
Supine time of events pH < 6.0	48.2 ± 35.0	0–97.8
Upright time of events pH < 6.0	18.3 ± 17.6	0–52.0
Number of events pH < 5.5	5.6 ± 6.1	0–18
Supine time of events pH < 5.5	23.0 ± 25.8	0–89.6
Upright time of events pH < 5.5	4.3 ± 6.4	0–22.1
Number of events pH < 5.0	2.2 ± 3.0	0–9
Supine time of events pH < 5.0	8.5 ± 13.5	0–64.2
Upright time of events pH < 5.0	1.2 ± 2.0	0–7.5
Pepsin findings
Pepsin saliva concentrations (ng/mL)
Morning (m ± SD)	61.1 ± 80.5	0–302
Evening (m ± SD)	82.4 ± 95.3	0–375
Abnormal pepsin levels
Morning	14 (38)	–
Evening	20 (54)	–
At least one abnormal measure	27 (73)	–

*Number of reflux event lasting > 5 min

BMI body mass index, m mean, N number of patients, SD standard deviation

Table 2

Symptoms and findings of patients

RSS-12 outcomes	Mean SD
Voice disorder	1.6 ± 3.5
Throat pain or odynophagia	1.2 ± 2.5
Dysphagia	1.8 ± 4.2
Throat clearing	4.1 ± 5.8
Globus sensation	3.3 ± 5.7
Excess throat mucus	6.5 ± 8.4
Halitosis	5.4 ± 8.0
Heartburn, stomach acid coming up, regurgitations, burps, nausea	10.6 ± 9.8
Abdominal pain or diarrheas	6.0 ± 7.4
Indigesiton, abdominal distension and/or flatus	9.1 ± 9.2
Cough after eating or lying down or daytime troublesome cough	4.4 ± 5.5
Breathing difficulties, breathlessness, or wheezing	6.5 ± 7.4
Quality of Life score	22.2 ± 23.4
RSS-12 total score	60.6 ± 47.1
RSA outcomes
Anterior pillar erythema	2.5 ± 2.0
Uvula erythema ± edema	0.7 ± 1.3
Coated tongue	1.9 ± 0.5
Oral cavity subscore	5.2 ± 2.0
Posterior oro- or hypopharyngeal wall erythema	3.4 ± 1.4
Posterior oro- or hypopharyngeal wall inflammatory granulations	0.1 ± 0.5
Tongue tonsil hypertrophy	1.4 ± 1.7
Contact between epiglotitis and tongue tonsils	1.1 ± 1.8
Pharyngeal sticky mucus	2.4 ± 2.0
Pharyngeal cavity subscore	8.8 ± 3.8
Ventricular band erythema ± edema	0.1 ± 0.1
Epiglottis erythema	0.8 ± 1.4
Commissure posterior/arytenoid erythema	3.2 ± 2.0
Inter-arytenoid granulatory tissue	0.1 ± 0.1
Posterior commissure hypertrophy	1.9 ± 2.4
Retro-cricoid erythema	0.5 ± 1.1
Retro-cricoid edema	0.2 ± 0.9
Endolaryngeal sticky mucus deposit	0.3 ± 0.9
Laryngeal subscore	7.0 ± 3.8
RSA Total score	20.7 ± 7.8

RSA reflux sign assessment, RSS-12 reflux symptom score-12, SD standard deviation

Table 3

Sleep findings

Sleep features	Mean, SD	Range
Apnea–Hypopnea Index	19.9 ± 19.0	0–78
No OSAS	7 (19)	–
Mild OSAS	10 (27)	–
Moderate OSAS	12 (32)	–
Severe OSAS	8 (22)	–
Sleep phases (min)
Phase 1	49.8 ± 49.0	6–263
Phase 2	273.5 ± 72.2	93–333
Phase 3	85.9 ± 35.9	32–160
Paradoxical sleep	76.4 ± 34.7	8–143
Arousal data
Arousal (tot N)	151.8 ± 129.4	24–411
Arousal (N/hour)	15.4 ± 17.1	1–47
Episodes of saturation < 90%	6.4 ± 17.2	0–94
Epworth Sleepiness Scale	8.3 ± 5.8	0–29
Pichot Score	11.1 ± 8.9	0–32

OSAS obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, SD standard deviation

Prevalence of reflux

The reflux was diagnosed in 34/37 patients with sleep disturbances and LPR-symptoms (97%). Among patients with a positive LPR diagnosis at the oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and contributive pepsin test, 27/31 (87%) had at least one positive pepsin test. The three patients without LPR at the oropharyngeal pH-monitoring had at least one positive pepsin measurement.

Among OSA patients, 28/30 (93%) had positive LPR at the oropharyngeal pH-monitoring. Peptest was positive in 22/27 OSA patients (81%) with a positive LPR diagnosis at the oropharyngeal pH-monitoring.

Associations

The association analysis reported significant positive associations between the BMI and the following sleep and reflux parameters: total number of arousals (r_s = 0.392; p = 0.015); RSA (r_s = 0.587; p < 0.001); reflux time at pH < 6.5 (r_s = 0.447; p = 0.004) and Ryan score (r_s = 0.385; p = 0.015). There were significant positive associations between Ryan score and the following: level of bedtime pepsin (r_s = 0.338; p = 0.047); oral (r_s = 0.380; p = 0.017), pharyngeal (r_s = 0.554; p < 0.001), laryngeal signs (r_s = 0.378; p = 0.041), total RSA (r_s = 0.539; p < 0.001), meaning that patients with highest Ryan score reported highest RSA sub- and total scores. Similar observations were found for reflux time at pH < 6.5 in supine or upright position (Table 4).

Table 4

Associations between reflux and sleep outcomes

		Reflux outcomes
		Morning	Bedtime	Oral	Pharynx	Tonsil	Larynx	Total	Total	Ryan	pH < 6.5	pH < 6.5	pH < 6.5
Reflux outcomes	BMI	pepsin	pepsin	RSA	RSA	Score	RSA	RSA	RSS − 12	Score	Supine	Upright	N (tot)
Ryan score	0.385*	0.163	0.338*	0.380*	0.554***	0.382*	0.378*	0.539***	− 0.039	–	–	–	–
Reflux pH < 6.5 supine	0.447**	0.226	0.181	0.109	0.625***	0.358*	0.525***	0.678***	0.129	–	–	–	–
Reflux pH < 6.5 upright	0.132	0.147	0.064	0.303	0.328*	0.334*	0.449**	0.474**	− 0.092	–	–	–	–
Sleep outcomes
AHI	0.227	− 0.106	0.402*	0.134	0.346	0.212	0.066	0.153	− 0.204	0.237	0.281	− 0.075	− 0.073
N1	0.008	− 0.044	0.301	− 0.132	0.033	0.109	− 0.056	− 0.035	− 0.044	− 0.115	− 0.088	− 0.118	− 0.031
N2	0.106	− 0.071	− 0.108	0.238	0.192	0.027	0.189	0.249	0.084	− 0.009	0.295	0.078	0.064
N3	0.044	0.185	− 0.188	0.217	0.001	− 0.023	0.044	0.099	0.070	− 0.103	0.084	0.050	− 0.007
Paradoxical sleep	0.014	− 0.415*	0.025	− 0.095	0.190	− 0.152	− 0.319	− 0.076	0.084	− 0.230	− 0.121	− 0.279	− 0.188
Arousal (N)	0.392*	0.167	0.299	0.099	0.118	0.369*	0.204	0.204	− 0.098	0.054	0.202	0.058	− 0.024
Arousal (N/h)	0.289	0.099	0.321	0.022	0.035	0.172	0.148	0.106	− 0.089	0.019	0.110	0.010	− 0.080
Saturation < 90%	0.250	0.097	0.354*	0.019	0.088	0.265	0.063	0.084	− 0.041	− 0.071	0.062	0.003	− 0.019
Epworth	0.205	− 0.006	0.229	0.165	− 0.014	0.115	0.210	0.141	0.040	0.081	− 0.009	0.022	− 0.237
Pichot	0.208	0.157	0.060	− 0.146	0.112	0.177	− 0.014	0.055	0.454**	0.188	0.079	− 0.039	− 0.108

Tonsil score was the score of tongue tonsil thickening

AHI apnea–hypopnea index, BMI body mass index, RSA reflux sign assessment, RSS-12 reflux symptom score-12

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

The associations between reflux and sleep findings are described in Table 4. Focusing on reflux signs, the tongue-base hypertrophy severity was significantly associated with the BMI (r_s = 0.419; p = 0.010); the number of micro arousals (r_s = 0.369; p = 0.027); the supine percent of pH < 6.5 (r_s = 0.358; p = 0.030); the upright percent of pH < 6.5 (r_s = 0.334; p = 0.044); the Ryan score (r_s = 0.382; p = 0.020); the morning (r_s = 0.373; p = 0.030) and bedtime pepsin saliva measurements (r_s = 0.365; p = 0.037).

Concerning associations between reflux and sleep outcomes, the analysis reported a significant positive association between the level of pepsin at bedtime and the AHI (r_s = 0.402; p = 0.017). There was a negative association between the duration of the paradoxical sleep phase and the level of pepsin in the morning (r_s = − 0.415; p = 0.013). The level of bedtime pepsin was associated with the duration of the sleep time with a saturation < 90% (r_s = 0.354; p = 0.040). There was no significant association between OSA and the GI endoscopy findings.

Discussion

The association between gastroesophageal reflux disease, laryngopharyngeal reflux and sleep apnea remains a controversial topic. Many studies reported a high prevalence of reflux in OSA patients [7, 9, 19], but the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of this association are still unknown.

In the present study, patients underwent oropharyngeal pH-monitoring, pepsin saliva measurements and polysomnography at the same time. The primary finding was the observation of a high prevalence of LPR in OSA patients at the oropharyngeal pH-monitoring (93%), which corroborates the findings of the literature. Indeed, the prevalence of reflux in OSA patients ranges from 38.9% to 100% according to studies [19–23]. The LPR prevalence was estimated to 10% to 30% of general population or population consulting in otolaryngology department [24–26]. In our study, most reflux events were nonacid (pH < 6.5), which corroborates the findings of Wang et al. [27] who reported that OSA patients treated with CPAP had nonacid LPR at the oropharyngeal pH-monitoring.

Interestingly, we observed that most oropharyngeal reflux events occurred supine and nighttime. This supine/nighttime profile of LPR does not corroborate the typical LPR profile of patients without OSA at the oropharyngeal pH-monitoring [28] or hypopharyngeal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH) [13, 19, 29]. Indeed, LPR patients have commonly upright and daytime pharyngeal reflux events, while the supine/nighttime events represent a low proportion of the 24-h reflux events [13, 19, 28, 29]. The higher BMI of OSA patients and the related higher risk of GERD [30], which is commonly associated with supine events, may support our observation.

Our analysis reported significant associations between Ryan score, reflux time at pH < 6.5 in supine position, pepsin measurements and high scores at the RSA, especially tongue-base hypertrophy scores. The association between fibroscopic finding severity, pepsin saliva level and oropharyngeal pH-monitoring may support the key role of pepsin in the development of laryngopharyngeal inflammatory reaction of the mucosa and the related-edema in OSA patients. Thus, it seems conceivable that the high proportion of reflux time and the related deposit of pepsin lead to an increase of the tongue-base edema and a worsening of the apnea findings. The positive association between the severity of the tongue-base hypertrophy and the occurrence of the micro-arousal events at the polysomnography may support the role of reflux, mucosa edema and OSAS. Interestingly, the influence of reflux on the tongue-base edema of OSA patients was furthermore supported in the study of Sung et al. who observed high reflux finding scores in OSA patients [31]. The association between pH-monitoring and sleep features at the polysomnography was investigated in many studies [20–22, 32–34], which reported controversial findings. Patients with severe OSA reported significant higher number of nocturnal proximal or distal esophageal events compared with patients with mild OSA in few studies [20, 34], while some authors did not find significant associations between reflux and OSA findings [21, 22]. The inconsistencies between studies are probably due to methodological differences in the evaluation of reflux events, which was carried out with esophageal dual- or triple-probe pH monitoring [22, 33], or only esophageal distal probe [20, 30]. Most of these pH-study instruments do not consider weakly acid or nonacid pharyngeal events. To date, it is known that a significant number of proximal esophageal reflux events do not reach pharyngeal region, which supports the need to use device with pharyngeal sensors, such as HEMII-pH or oropharyngeal pH-monitoring [35].

The primary limitation of this study were the low number of patients and the lack of control group. Because oropharyngeal pH-monitoring is costly and inconvenient, it was difficult to convince patients to have polysomnography and pH-monitoring at the same time. The investigation of the LPR prevalence in healthy individuals and the correlation analysis between fiberoptic findings and pH testing features should have improved the quality of the present study. Another potential limitation was the lack of use of HEMII-pH, which may provide important findings on esophageal reflux and GERD. In addition, HEMII-pH is currently considered as the most reliable device in the LPR diagnosis but a recent investigation supported the reliability of oropharyngeal pH-monitoring in patients who underwent HEMII-pH and oropharyngeal pH-monitoring in the same 24-h period [36]. From a clinical standpoint, the anatomical features of patients were investigated with RSA. The addition of Friedmann or Mallampati scores should improve the clinical checkup in our population. Moreover, some confounding factors might have biased the clinical evaluations (e.g. pollution).

The primary strengths of the study were the realization of oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and polysomnography in the same period and the measurement of pepsin saliva concentration at two important times, highlighting the pepsin deposit in the upright/daytime period and the supine/nighttime period of the 24-h pH-monitoring period. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study using such approach combining pH-monitoring, pepsin measurement and polysomnography at the same time.

Conclusion

OSA patients reported high prevalence of reflux events at the oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and high level of pepsin saliva measurement compared to normative data. The findings of the present study may support a potential relationship between oropharyngeal reflux events, pepsin saliva level, pharyngeal signs and micro-arousals but these findings need to the confirmed in future controlled studies.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Elsan Group for the funding.

Author contributions

JRL: drafting, revision of draft, data analysis. FB: drafting, revision of draft, data analysis.

Funding

This research received funding from Elsan Hospital (recipient: Francois Bobin; n°2022–01).

Declarations

Abbreviations

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

Lechien JR Akst

Hamdan

Schindler

Karkos

Barillari

Calvo-Henriquez

Crevier-Buchman

Finck

Eun

Saussez

Vaezi

Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: state of the art review

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019 160 5 762 782 10.1177/0194599819827488 30744489

Lechien JR Hans

Simon

Horoi

Calvo-Henriquez

Chiesa-Estomba

Mayo-Yáñez

Bartel

Piersiala

Nguyen

Saussez

Association between laryngopharyngeal reflux and media otitis: a systematic review

Otol Neurotol 2021 42 7 e801 e814 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003123 33710157

Ren

Zhao

Wang

Ren

Tang

PepsinA as a marker of laryngopharyngeal reflux detected in chronic rhinosinusitis patients

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017 156 5 893 900 10.1177/0194599817697055 28457223

Halstead

Gastroesophageal reflux: a critical factor in pediatric subglottic stenosis

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999 120 5 683 688 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ks1Cgug%3D%3D 10.1053/hn.1999.v120.a91766 10229593

Kayalı Dinc

Cayonu

Sengezer

Sahin

Smoking cessation improves the symptoms and the findings of laryngeal irritation

Ear Nose Throat J 2020 99 2 124 127 10.1177/0145561319881559 31608685

Lechien JR Huet

Khalife

Fourneau

Delvaux

Piccaluga

Harmegnies

Saussez S Impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux on subjective and objective voiceassessments: a prospective study

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016 45 1 59 10.1186/s40463-016-0171-1 27825368 5101798

O'Connor-Reina

Garcia

JMI

Baptista

Garcia-Iriarte

Alba

Perona

Borrmann

Alcala

Plaza

Non-acid reflux and sleep apnea: the importance of drug induced sleep endoscopy

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021 50 1 42 10.1186/s40463-021-00526-w 34193270 8247236

Suurna

Welge

Surdulescu

Kushner

Steward

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of pantoprazole for daytime sleepiness in GERD and obstructive sleep disordered breathing

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008 139 2 286 290 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.03.012 18656731

Teklu

Gouveia

Yalamanchili

Ghadersohi

Price

CPE

Bove

Attarian

Tan

Predicting obstructive sleep apnea status with the reflux symptom index in a sleep study population

Laryngoscope 2020 10.1002/lary.28592 32119130

10.

Lechien JR Bobin

Rodriguez

Dequanter

Muls

Huet

Harmegnies

Crevier-Buchman

Hans

Saussez

Carroll

Development and validation of the short version of the reflux symptom score: reflux symptom score-12

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021 164 1 166 174 10.1177/0194599820941003 32689876

11.

Berry

Budhiraja

Gottlieb

Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events. Deliberations of the sleep apnea definitions task force of the American academy of sleep medicine

J Clin Sleep Med 2012 8 5 597 619 10.5664/jcsm.2172 23066376 3459210

12.

Lechien JR Finck

Huet

Khalife

Fourneau

Delvaux

Piccaluga

Harmegnies

Saussez

Impact of age on laryngopharyngeal reflux disease presentation: a multi-center prospective study

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017 274 10 3687 3696 10.1007/s00405-017-4671-z 28717979

13.

Lechien JR Rodriguez Ruiz

Dequanter

Bobin

Mouawad

Muls

Huet

Harmegnies

Remacle

Finck

Saussez

Validity and reliability of the reflux sign assessment

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2020 129 4 313 325 10.1177/0003489419888947 31729247

14.

Lechien JR Chan

Akst

Hoppo

Jobe

Chiesa-Estomba

Muls

Bobin

Saussez

Carroll

Vaezi

Bock

Normative ambulatory reflux monitoring metrics for laryngopharyngeal reflux: a systematic review of 720 healthy individuals

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021 10.1177/01945998211029831 34813382

15.

Bobin

Journe

Lechien JR

Saliva pepsin level of laryngopharyngeal reflux patients is not correlated with reflux episodes

Laryngoscope 2020 130 5 1278 1281 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXnslKqtrw%3D 10.1002/lary.28260 31461170

16.

Lechien JR Bobin

Dequanter

Rodriguez

Le Bon

Horoi

Thill

Salem

Muls

Saussez

Does pepsin saliva concentration (peptest™) predict the therapeutic response of laryngopharyngeal reflux patients?

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2021 130 9 996 1003 10.1177/0003489420986347 33467863

17.

Kaminska

Jobin

Mayer

Amyot

Perraton-Brillon

Bellemare

The epworth sleepiness scale: self-administration versus administration by the physician, and validation of a French version

Can Respir J 2010 17 2 e27 34 10.1155/2010/438676 20422065 2866221

18.

Pichot

Brun

Brief self-evaluation questionnaire for depressive, asthenic and anxious dimensions

Ann Med Psychol (Paris) 1984 142 6 862 865 1:STN:280:DyaL2M7itVChtg%3D%3D 6524792

19.

Bobin

Auregan

Muls

Cammaroto

Hans

Saussez

Lechien JR

Impedance-pH monitoring profile of patients with reflux and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a controlled study

Clin Otolaryngol 2021 46 4 816 822 10.1111/coa.13745 33621406

20.

Elhennawi

Ahmed

Abou-Halawa

Correlation of obstructive sleep apnoea and laryngopharyngeal reflux: phmetry study

Clin Otolaryngol 2016 41 6 758 761 1:STN:280:DC%2BC28jls12juw%3D%3D 10.1111/coa.12640 26929261

21.

Xiao

Liu

Lin

Wen

Chen

Gastroesophageal and laryngopharyngeal reflux profiles in patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome as determined by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring

Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012 24 6 e258 e265 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01920.x 22519455

22.

Erdem

Yılmaz

Özcan

Titiz

Özlügedik

Ünal

Correlation of sleep-disordered breathing and laryngopharyngeal reflux: a two-channel triple-sensor pHmetry catheter study

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018 275 10 2585 2592 10.1007/s00405-018-5107-0 30155640

23.

Xavier

Eckley

Duprat

de Souza Fontes

Navarro-Rodriguez

Patrocínio

Tridente

Lorenzi-Filho

Temporal association between respiratory events and reflux in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and laryngopharyngeal reflux

J Clin Sleep Med 2019 15 10 1397 1402 10.5664/jcsm.7960 31596203 6778358

24.

Kamani

Penney

Mitra

Pothula

The prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in the English population

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012 269 10 2219 2225 10.1007/s00405-012-2028-1 22576243

25.

Spantideas

Drosou

Bougea

Assimakopoulos

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the Greek general population, prevalence and risk factors

BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2015 15 7 10.1186/s12901-015-0020-2 26696776 4687326

26.

Connor

Palazzi-Churas

Cohen

Symptoms of extraesophageal reflux in a community – dwelling sample

J Voice 2007 21 189 202 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.10.006 16472972

27.

Wang

Han

Wang

Liu

Sun

Sui

Zhong

Relationship between reflux diseases and obstructive sleep apnea together with continuous positive airway pressure treatment efficiency analysis

Sleep Med 2020 75 151 155 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.07.024 32858354

28.

Müller

Schulte

Babic

Knepper

Fuchs

Schröder

Bruns

Leers

Fuchs

Software improvement for evaluation of laryngopharyngeal pH testing (Restech) - a comparison between DataView 3 and 4

World J Gastrointest Surg 2020 12 5 236 246 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i5.236 32551029 7289646

29.

Sikavi DR Cai

Leung

Carroll

Chan

Impaired proximal esophageal contractility predicts pharyngeal reflux in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms

Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2021 12 10 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000408 34597279 8487779

30.

Ing

Ngu

Breslin

Obstructive sleep apnea and gastroesophageal reflux

Am J Med 2000 108 Suppl. 4a 120S 125S 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00350-2 10718464

31.

Sung

Lee

Wee

Lee

Kim

Factors associated with hypertrophy of the lingual tonsils in adults with sleep-disordered breathing

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013 139 6 598 603 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3263 23787418

32.

Ermis

Akyuz

Arici

Uyanikoglu

Yakar

Pinarbasi

Demir

Ozdil

Besisik

Kaymakoglu

Boztas

Cuhadaroglu

Mungan

Effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: an esophageal impedance-pHmetry study

Hepatogastroenterology 2011 58 110–111 1566 1573 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhs12gt7vK 10.5754/hge10465 21940322

33.

Wise

Del Gaudio

Gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with sleep-disordered breathing

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006 135 2 253 257 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.05.012 16890078

34.

Rodrigues

Dibbern

Santos

Influence of obesity on the correlation between laryngopharyngeal reflux and obstructive sleep apnea

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2014 80 5 10 10.5935/1808-8694.20140004 24626885 9443877

35.

Lechien JR

Clinical update findings about pH-impedance monitoring features in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients

J Clin Med 2022 11 11 3158 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XhsFWrsLbK 10.3390/jcm11113158 35683545 9181144

36.

Vance

Park

Alnouri

Turner

Daggumati

Ferster

APO

Ahmad

Lyons

Ross

Russell

Sataloff

Diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux: a comparison between 24-hour pH-impedance testing and pharyngeal probe (restech) testing, with introduction of the sataloff score

J Voice 2021 S0892–1997 21 00136 143 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.04.002

Association between oropharyngeal ph-monitoring,pepsin saliva concentration and degree of apnea–hypopnea index of obstructive sleep apnea

Abstract

Objective

Design

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Clinical evaluations

Oropharyngeal pH-monitoring

Pepsin saliva measurement

Sleep findings

Statistical methods

Results

Prevalence of reflux

Associations

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Funding

Declarations

Abbreviations

References