Sanded wood surfaces contain irregularities caused by both the sanding process and the anatomy, so the anatomical roughness, which is independent of any machining operation, must be excluded from measurements of surface irregularities if the processing roughness is to be properly evaluated. This paper investigates the effect of wood anatomy on surface roughness parameters of oak and spruce wood after sanding with P120 sandpaper. The wood anatomy is excluded from the roughness profile using a method developed by Gurau (2004). Total roughness parameters, which contain both the processing irregularities and the wood anatomy, are compared with processing roughness parameters. The effect of anatomy is to increase measures of roughness, particularly for oak.
CARRANOA. L. 2000. Characterisation of Wood Surface Preparation. Doctoral Thesis. North Carolina State University.
3.
COSTESJ. P. and LARRICQP. 2001. Surface Characterisation with 3-Dimensional Roughness Parameters. In: Proc. of the 15th International Wood Machining Seminar. 2001, Los Angeles. California.
4.
COTTAN. L., NASTASEV. and POPI. 1982. Slefuirea Lemnului si Peliculelor de Acoperire. Editura Tehnica, Bucuresti. Romania.
5.
EHLERSW. 1958. Quality determination of wood surfaces. Holz als Roh - und und Werkstoff16(2), pp.49–60.
6.
FUJIWARAY., FUJIIY. and OKUMURAS. 2003a. Effect of Removal of Deep Valleys on The Evaluation of Machined Surfaces of Wood. Forest Products Journal. 53(2), pp. 58–62.
7.
FUJIWARAY., FUJIIY. and OKUMURAS. 2003b. Robust Gaussian Filter and Three-Dimensional Parameters to Evaluate Wood Surface Roughness as Related to Tactile Roughness. In: Proc. of the 16th International Wood Machining Seminar. August2003. Matsue, Japan.
8.
FUNCKJ. W., FORRERJ. B., BUTLERD. A., BRUNNERC. C. and MARISTANYA.G.1992. Measuring Surface Roughness on Wood: A Comparison of Laser Scatter and Stylus Tracing Approaches. SPIE. vol.1821, pp. 173–184.
9.
GURAUL. 2004. The Roughness of Sanded Wood Surfaces. Doctoral thesis. Forest Products Research Centre. Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College. Brunel University.
10.
GURAUL., MANSFIELD-WILLIAMSH. and IRLEM. 2002. An Analysis of Wood Surface Roughness Data. In: BeallFrank C (Ed): Proc. of the 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. 19-21 August 2002, Berkeley Campus. California, USA. ISBN 1-892529-31-9.
11.
GURAUL., MANSFIELD-WILLIAMSH. and IRLEM., 2005. Processing Roughness of Sanded Wood Surfaces.Holz als Roh und Werkstoff63(1) February. 2005, pp.43–52, ISSN0018–3768.
12.
HEISELU. and KRONDORFERH. 1995. Merβtechnik für Massivholzoberflächen-Meβen der Kinematischen Rauheit von Umfangfräsbearbeiteten Oberflächen bei Massivholzem. HOB-KENNZIFFER. 5, pp. 240–242.
13.
ISO11562: 1996. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) — Surface Texture: Profile Method. Metrological Characteristics of Phase Correct Filters. British Standards Institute, London.
14.
ISO13565–1: 1996. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) — Surface Texture. Profile Method. Surfaces Having Stratified Functional Properties. Part 1: Filtering and General Measurement Conditions. British Standards Institute, London.
15.
ISO13565–2: 1996. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Surface Texture: Profile Method. Surfaces Having Stratified Functional Properties. Part 2: Height Characterisation Using the Linear Material Ratio Curve. British Standards Institute, London.
16.
ISO13565–3: 2000. Geometrical product specification (GPS). - Profile method. Surfaces having stratified functional properties. British Standards Institute, London.
17.
ISO3274: 1996. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Surface Texture. Profile Method. Nominal characteristics of contact (stylus) instruments. British Standards Institute, London.
18.
ISO4287: 1998. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS). Surface Texture. Profile Method. Terms. Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters. British Standards Institute, London.
19.
ISO/DTS16610–31: 2002(E). Geometrical product specification (GPS) - Filtration. Part 31: Robust profile filters. Gaussian regression filters. In Draft. International Standards Organisation.
20.
KRISCHJ and CSIHAC. 1999. Analysing Wood Surface Roughness Using an 53P Perthometer and Computer Based Data Processing. in:Proc. XIII Sesja Naukowa “Badania dla Meblarstwa”. 1999, Poland. pp. 145–154, ISBN 83-88518-04–6.
21.
MAGROSSE. and SITKEIG. 1999. Influence of Wood Structure on the Surface Roughness at Milling Operations. In: Proc. of the 4th ICWSF. 1999,Missenden Abbey,FPRC,Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, High Wycombe, UK. pp. 290–296
22.
PETERSC. and MERGENA. 1971. Measuring Wood Surface Smoothness: A Proposed Method. Forest Products Journal. 21(7), pp. 28–30.
23.
PETERSC. C. and CUMMINGJ. D. 1970. Measuring Wood. Surface Smoothness: A Review. Forest Products Journal. 20(12), pp. 40–43.
24.
SCHADOFFSKYO.2000. Topographiebewertung zur Prozeβbeurteilung beim Fräsen und Schleifen von Massivholz. Doctoral thesis. Technische Universität Braunschweig, IWF. Vulkan - Verlag, Essen2000, ISBN 3-8027-8652–1.
25.
STEWARTH. A. 1980. Some Surfacing Defects and Problems Related to Wood Moisture Content. Wood and Fibre Science. 12(3), pp. 175–182.
26.
USENIUSA. 1975. Surface Smoothness Measurement of Sawn Timber. Paperi ja Puu. 4, pp. 321–326.
27.
WESTKAIVIPERE. and RIEGELA. 1993. QualitätskriterienfurGeschlieffeneMassivholzoberflächen. Holz als Roh - und Werkstoff51(2), pp. 121–125.
28.
WESTKÄMPERE. and SCHADOFFSKYO. 1995a. Oberflächentopographie von Massivholz. Einflüsse und Verfahren bei der Meβtechnischen Erfassung und Bewertung von Holzoberflächen. Teil 1. HOB. 3, pp. 74–78.
29.
WESTKAMPERE. and SCHADOFFSKYO. 1995b. Oberflächentopographie von Massivholz. Einfliisse und Verfahren bei der Mefltechnischen Erfassung und Bewertung von Holzoberflächen. Teil 2. HOB. 4, pp. 50–54.
30.
WIELOCHG. and POHLP. 1999. Computer Programmes Supporting. Surface Roughness Measuring by Profilographometer for Wood and Wood Products. In: Proc. 50 Rokov
