Abstract
A cellular automaton model of ‘free’ dendritic growth has been used to produce a variety of simulated dendrite morphologies. Different primary and secondary dendrite arm spacings were produced by altering two key parameters in the model; the initial supercooling in the liquid and γ, which represents the solid–liquid interfacial energy in the model. An attempt to quantify the morphological variations has been made using computed hydraulic radii. For comparison hydraulic radii and secondary dendrite arm spacings are included, as measuredfrom an aluminium alloy casting.
MST/3034
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
