The review aims to demonstrate that formal methods of evaluating research performance can play a valuable role in overcoming some of the problems with decision-making in basic science based on peer review. An approach which combines a number of research output indicators, including bibliometric measures derived from publication and citation analysis, is first outlined and then applied in a case study of the European Laboratory for Particle Physics, CERN, over the period 1961–1984.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
IrvineJ. and MartinB. R., What direction for basic scientific research?inScience and Technology Policy in the1980s and Beyond, GibbonsM., GummettP. and UdgaonkarB. M.(Eds) pp. 67–98. Longman, Harlow (1984).
2.
MartinB. R. and IrvineJ., cern: Past performance and future prospects –1 – cern's position in world high–energy physics. Research Policy13, 183–210 (1984). J. Irvine and B. R. Martin, cern: Past performance and future prospects – II – The scientific performance of the cern accelerators. Research Policy 13, 247–284 (1984).
3.
MartinB. R. and IrvineJ., Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy12, 61–90 (1983).
4.
GalisonP., How the first neutral-current experiments ended. Reviews of Modern Physics55, 477–509 (1983).
5.
PickeringA., Constructing Quarks. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984).
IrvineJ. and MartinB. R., Basic research in the East and West: A comparison of the scientific performance of high-energy physics accelerators. Social Studies of Science15, 293–341 (1985).
8.
MartinB. R. and IrvineJ., cern: Past performance and future prospects – III – cern and the future of world high-energy physics. Research Policy13, 247–284 (1984).
