Archaeology is concerned with man-made monuments and information which have survived for long periods of time. The safe disposal of highly radioactive wastes involves the design of disposal systems intended to function for equally long periods of time. In this review it is shown how archaeology can provide a basis for designing a segment of the disposal system – the marking of the site to minimize future human interference.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
us Department of Energy, Generic Environmental Impact Statement, Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste, doe/eis-0046f (October 1980); us Department of Energy, Statement of Position of the us Department of Energy in the Matter of Proposed Rulemaking on Storage and Disposal of Nuclear Wastes (Waste Confidence Rulemaking), doe/ne-0007 (April1980).
2.
HauserS., Problematisch sind nicht nur die Antworten, sondern bereits die Voraussetzungen. Zeitschrift für Semiotik6, 325–330 (1984).
3.
BlonskyM., Wes Geistes Kind ist die Atomsemiotik?. Zeitschrift für Semiotik6, 311–324 (1984).
4.
RochlinG. I., Nuclear Waste Disposal – Two Social Criteria. Science195, 23–31 (1977).
5.
RehderW., Sicherung gegen Kodebrecher durch Randomisierung. Zeitschrift für Semiotik6, 271–276 (1984).
6.
For a review of safety analyses performed in the United States and other countries, seeKoplikC. M., KaplanM. F. and RossB., The Safety of Repositories for Highly Radioactive Wastes, Reviews of Modern Physics54, 269–310(January1982).
7.
us Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in Geologic Repositories: 10 cfr 60: Proposed Rule, Federal RegisterVol. 46, No. 13035280–32596(8 July1981).
8.
us Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes: 40 cfr 191: Proposed Rule, Federal RegisterVol. 47, No. 25058196–58206(29 December1982).
9.
Human Interference Task Force, Reducing the Likelihood of Future Human Activities that Could Affect Geologic High-Level Waste Repositories, prepared for the Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, bmi/onwi-537 (May1984).
10.
KaplanM. F., Archaeological Data as a Basis for Repository Marker Design, prepared for the Office of Nuclear Isolation, onwi-354(October1982).
11.
SebeokT. A., Communication Measures Designed to Bridge Ten Millenia, prepared for the Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, bmi/onwi-532(April1984).
12.
SebeokT. A., Die Büchse der Pandora und ihre Sicherung: Ein Relaissystem in Obhut einer Atompriesterschaft. Zeitschrift für Semiotik6, 229–254 (1984).
13.
WaceA. J. B. and StubbingsF. H., A Companion to Homer, London (1970).
14.
LordA. B., The Singer of Tales, New York (1968).
15.
PsarrasC., us May Concoct Tales of Horror to Deter Trespass at Nuclear Site, Wall Street Journal (25 June 1984); C. Holden, Omens of Doom for a Nuclear Tomb, Science 489 (3 August 1984); ‘Pharaoh's Curse’ for Dumps, Boston Globe (13 August 1984). The reaction to T. Sebeok's work highlights the need for practical and pragmatic solutions which do not rely upon extraordinary means. BastideF. and FabbriP.in ‘Lebende Detektoren und komplementare Zeichen: Katzen, Augen und Sirenen’. Zeitschrift für Semiotik6, 257–264 (1984), suggest the breeding of animals whose skin will discolor when exposed to radiation. Unfortunately, these animals’ skins will be permanently discolored because there is no way to escape the radiation which is caused by natural background sources such as rocks and cosmic rays. P. Sonntag, ‘Künstlicher Mond am Himmel und Datenbank im Keller’. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 6, 269–270 (1984), discusses the creation of an artificial moon to contain the information about the repository. The basis for the suggestion is the catastrophes which can befall our planet. If such a catastrophe occurs, however, humanity is likely to regain the ability to disrupt the repository before it regains the ability to travel to the artificial moon. The inclusion of a science fiction writer in the journal issue, S, Lem, ‘Mathematische Kodierung auf lebenden Trägermaterial’. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 6, 253–256 (1984), does not appreciably increase the credibility of the project. V. Voigt's contribution, ‘Konzentrisch angeordnete Warntafeln in zunehmend neueren Sprachformen’. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 6, 265–268 (1984), is an interesting one, yet we can only request that future generations update the message. We have no means of guaranteeing that update.
16.
FakhryA., The Pyramids, Chicago (1969); W. S. Smith, The Old Kingdom in Egypt and the Beginning of the First Intermediate Period, Cambridge Ancient History Vol. 1, part 2, Chapter 14, 145–207. Cambridge (1971).
17.
AtkinsonR. J. E., Stonehenge, London (1956); A. Burl, The Stone Circles of the British Isles, New Haven (1976).
18.
HawkinsG. S., Stonehenge Decoded, New York (1965); G. S. Hawkins, Stonehenge: A Neolithic Computer. Nature 202, 1258–1261 (1964); R. J. E. Atkinson, Decoder Misled. Nature 210, 1302 (1966); R. J. E. Atkinson, Moonshine on Stonehenge. Antiquity 40, 212 (1966); F. Hoyle, Speculations on Stonehenge. Antiquity 40, 262–276 (1966); F. Hoyle, Stonehenge – An Eclipse Predictor. Nature 211, 454–456 (1966); C. A. Newham, Stonehenge – A Neolithic ‘Observatory’. Nature 211, 456–458 (1966); D. H. Sadler, Prediction of Eclipses. Nature 211, 1119–1121 (1966).
19.
RenfrewC., Before Civilization: The Radiocarbon Revolution and Prehistoric Europe, New York (1973).
20.
ThorpeL., Geoffrey of Monmouth: The History of the Kings of England, A Translation, London (1966).
21.
TravlosJ., Pictorial Dictionary of Ancient Athens, New York (1971); S. Rossiter, Greece: The Blue Guide, London (1971); R. Meiggs and D. Lewis, A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions to the End of the Fifth Century bc, Oxford (1969).
22.
Second International Symposium on the Deterioration of Building Stones(held Athens, 1976), Athens (1978).
23.
BourasC., Testing Time for the Acropolis Monuments. Stone Industries14, 22–26 (1979).
24.
GeilW. E., The Great Wall of China, New York (1909); R. Silverberg, The Great Wall of China, New York (1965); J. Fryer, The Great Wall of China, London (1975); J. Needham, Science and Civilization in China, Cambridge (1954); O. Lattimore, Inner Asian Frontiers of China, New York (1951); P. Lum, The Purple Barrier, London (1960).
25.
GreenmanE. F., Serpent Mound, Ohio Historical Society, Columbus (1970); F. W. Putnam, The Serpent Mound of Ohio, Century Illustrated Monthly Magazine 871–888 (April 1890); E. G. Squier and E. H. Davis, Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley, New York (1848); J. P. MacLean, The Great Serpent Mound, American Anthropologist 21, 153–163 (1919).
26.
DowS., Andrews of Cornell. Cornell Alumni News13–21(December1972).
27.
LewinS. Z. and CarolaA. E., Scanning Electron Microscopy in the Diagnosis of ‘Diseased Stone’, Scanning Electron Microscopy1, 695–704 (1978); E. M. Winkler (Ed.), Decay and Preservation of Stone, The Geological Society of America, Engineering Geology Case Histories Number 11, Boulder, Colorado (1978); Conservation of Historic Stone Buildings and Monuments, National Academy Press, Washington, dc (1982).
28.
Art and Archaeology Technical Abstracts, Institute for Fine Arts, New YorkUniversity, published for the International Institute for Conservation of Historical and Artistic Works, London, 1 (1964) and subsequent volumes.
29.
BrowningI., Petra, London (1974).
30.
NelsonD. L., Remembering Pictures and Words: Appearances, Significance and Name, inLevels of Processing in Human Memory, CermakL. S. and CraikF. I. M.(Eds), 45–76, Summit, New Jersey (1979); N. H. Frija, Things to Remember, in Studies in Long Term Memory A. Kennedy and A. Wilkes, (Eds) 143–161, New York (1975).
31.
PaivioA., Imagery and Long-Term Memory, inStudies in Long Term Memory, KennedyA. and WilkesA., (Eds)57–85, New York (1975); P. H. K. Seymour, Human Visual Cognition, London (1979); P. H. K. Seymour, Semantic Equivalence of Verbal and Pictorial Displays, in Studies in Long Term Memory A. Kennedy and A. Wilkes, (Eds) 253–288, New York (1975).
32.
JacobyL. L. and CraikF. I. M., Effects of Elaboration of Processing at Encoding and Retrieval: Trace Distinctiveness and Recovery of Initial Content, inLevels of Processing in Human Memory, CermakL. S. and CraikF. I. M.(Eds)1–22, Summit, New Jersey (1979).
33.
NeurathM., Isotype: Educative Through the Eye, inSymbol Sourcebook: An Authoratative Guide to International Graphic Symbols, DreyfussH., (Ed.)New York (1972).
34.
CroyP., Signs and Their Message, Musterschmidt, Göttingen (1972).
35.
TannenbaumP. H., Communication across 300 Generations: Deterring Human Interference with Nuclear Waste Repository Sites, prepared for the Office for Nuclear Waste Isolation, bmi/onwi-535 (April 1984); us Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Standards for Protection against Radiation: 10 cfr 20, Federal RegisterVol. 25, 10914–10924(17 November1960).
36.
American Institute of Graphic Arts, Symbol Signs – The Development of Passenger/Pedestrian Oriented Symbols for Use in Transportation Related Facilities, prepared for the Department of Transportation, pb-239–352 (November1974).
37.
P. H. Tannenbaum, Communication across 300 Generations: Deterring Human Interference with Nuclear Waste Repository Sites, prepared for the Office for Nuclear Waste Isolation, bwi/onwi-535 (April 1984);TannenbaumP. H., Staffelung der Informationsquellen nach Inhalt und Entfernung von den Lagerstätten, Zeitschrift für Semiotik6, 277288 (1984).
38.
TannenbaumP. H., Communication across 300 Generations: Deterring Human Interference with Nuclear Waste Repository Sites, prepared for the Office for Nuclear Waste Isolation, bmi/onwi-535 (April 1984);D. B. Givens, From Here to Eternity: Communicating with the Distant Future39(2) 159–179(1982); American Institute of Graphic Arts, Symbol Signs – The Development of Passenger/Pedestrian Oriented Symbols for Use in Transportation Related Facilities, prepared for the Department of Transportation, PB-239–352 (November 1974); W. S. Smith, The Art and Architecture of Ancient Egypt, Baltimore (1965).
39.
GivensD. B., Was wir aus der Menschheitsgeschichte lernen können, Zeitschrift für Semiotik6, 289–310 (1984); D. B. Givens, From Here to Eternity: Communicating with the Distant Future 39(2), 159–179 (1982).
40.
UlmanJ. N. and GouldJ. R., Technical Reporting, New York, Third Edition (1972); J. Gilliland, Readability, London (1972); R. Gunning, The Technique of Clear Writing, New York (1968).
41.
This text can be read at a ninth-grade (age 14) reading level (see R. Gunning, n. 40). The text developed by the Task Force is more complex. It is twice as long as the text proposed here, and it requires the reading ability of a high school graduate. In addition, the Task Force text does not identify undesirable actions, and the consequences of such actions are very mildly stated, for example, ‘possibly harm living creatures’. A warning this mild is not likely to be heeded.
42.
The British Museum, The Rosetta Stone, London (1950).
