Will democracy fall victim to corporatism, new social movements or the power of interest groups? This review examines the history and current status of crisis theory and tests various hypotheses against actual events, concluding that a new theory of representation is needed if we are to understand the political changes taking place in the Western democracies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
von BeymeKl. The politics of limited pluralism?Government and Opposition, London, pp. 265–287 (1978).
2.
von BeymeKl. Neo-corporatism. A new nut in an old shell?International Political Science Reviewpp. 173–196 (1983).
3.
von BeymeKl. Do parties matter? The impact of parties on the key decisions in the political system. Government and Opposition, London, pp. 5–29 (1984).
4.
von BeymeKl. Parties in Western Democracies. Aldershot, Gower/New York, St. Martin's (1985).
5.
GaltungJ. Struktur, Kultur und intellektueller Stil, Leviathan83(3), 303–338 (1982).
6.
KaaseM. Partizipatorische Revolution – Ende der Parteien? European University Institute, eui, Mannheim, paper No. 1 (1981).
7.
KastendiekH. Gesamtgesellschaftliche Restrukturierung? Probleme einer attraktiven Hypothese. Frankfurt, Institut für Sozialforschung (mimeo) (1983).
8.
LehmbruchG. Liberal corporatism and party government. Comparative Political Studies, pp. 91–126 (1977).
9.
LehnerFranz and SchubertKlaus, Parties, Politics and Public Policy, eui, Florence (Paper for the Conference on The Future of Party Government) (1982).
10.
Müller-PantenbergU. Die mögliche historisch-politische Bedeutung der dritten großen Depression. Probleme des Klassenkampfes, pp. 24–39 (1981).
11.
NelkinD. and PoliakM., Atom Besieged, mitPress, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1981).
12.
OffeCl. Competitive party democracy and the Keynesian welfare state: factors of stability and disorganisation. Policy Sciences225–246 (1983).
13.
OlsenJ. P. Citizens’ Initiatives and the Organization of Representation. Paper for the Western European Studies Conference on Representation and the States, Stanford, ca (mimeo) (1982).
14.
OlsenM. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut (1982).
15.
PizzornoA. Interests and Parties in Pluralism, inOrganizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism and the Transformation of Politics, BergerS., et al. (Eds), pp. 247–284. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981).
16.
RaschkeJ. Politik und Wertwandel in den westlichen Demokratien. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B 36/80, pp. 23–45 (1980).
17.
SchmitterP. C. Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability in Contemporary Western Europe and North America, inOrganizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism and the Transformation of Politics, BergerS., et al. (Eds), pp. 285–327. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981).
18.
SchmitterP. C. Democratic Theory and Neo-Corporatist Practice. eui, Florence, Working Paper No. 74(mimeo) (1983).