Morphogenetic Classification of Malocclusion as a Basis for Growth Prediction and Treatment Planning

Abstract

Different groups, defined as morphogenetically homogeneous display an homogeneous morphology, grow alike and seem to respond alike to a given type of treatment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Droschl

(1973) The effect of heavy orthopedic forces on the maxilla in the growing Saimiri Sciureus (Squirrel monkey), American Journal of Orthodontics, 63, 449–461.

Elder

J. R.

and Tuenge

R. H.

(1974) Cephalometric and histologic changes produced by extra-oral high-pull traction to the maxilla in Macaca Mulatta, American Journal of Orthodontics, 66, 599–617.

Hasund

(1973) Klinische Kephalometric für die Bergen technik, Bergen.

Lavergne

and Gasson

(1976) A metal implant study of mandibular rotation, Angle Orthodontist, 46, 144–159.

Lavergne

and Gassen

(1977a) Rotational pattern of the mandible and indication for treatment of Class III malocclusion with chin cap, European Orthodontic Society, 237–243.

Lavergne

and Gasson

(1977b) Operational definitions of mandibular morphogenetic and positional rotations, Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 85, 185–192.

Lavergne

and Gasson

(1977b) Direction and intensity of mandibular rotation in the sagittal adjustment during growth of the jaws, Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 85, 193–199.

Lavergne

and Gasson

(1978) The influence of jaw rotation in the morphogenesis of malocclusions, American Journal of Orthodontics, 73, 658–666.

Lavergne

and Gassen

(1981) Analysis and classification of the rotational growth pattern without implants, British Journal of Orthodontics, 9, 51–56.

10.

Melsen

(1978) Effect of cervical anchorage during and after treatment: an implant study, American Journal of Orthodontics, 73, 526–540.