This is a report of a clinical trial, comparing an experimental glass ionomer luting cement with a zinc phosphate cement for securing orthodontic hands. The comparison was made by using survival analysis techniques. The glass ionomer cement performed significantly better than the zinc phosphate cement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BreslowN. E. and CrowleyJ. (1974) A large sample study of the life table and product limit estimates under random censorship, Annals of Statistics, 2, 437–453.
2.
BrossI. (1952) Sequential Medical Plans, Biometrics, 8, 188–205.
3.
ClarkR. J., PhillipsR. W. and NormanR. D. (1977) An evaluation of silicophosphate as an orthodontic cement, American Journal of Orthodontics, 71, 190–196.
4.
CoxD. R. and OatesD. (1984) Analysis of Survival Data, Chapman and Hall, London.
5.
FrickerJ. P. and McLachlanM. D. (1985) Clinical studies of glass ionomer cements Part I—A twelve month clinical study comparing zinc phosphate cement to glass ionomer, Australian Orthodontic Journal, 2, 179–180.
6.
GardnerM. J. and AltmanD. G. (1989) Statistics with Confidence, British Medical Journal, London, 0, 92.
7.
GehonE. A. (1965) A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing artibrarily singly-censored samples, Biometrika, 52, 203–223.
8.
GlavindL. (1977) Effect of monthly professional mechanical tooth cleaning on periodontal health in adults, Journal of clinical Periodontology, 4, 100–106.
9.
KaplanE. L. and MeierP. (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457–481.
10.
LawlessJ. F. (1982) Statistical models and methods for life time data, Wiley, Chichester.
11.
LewominR. C. and FelsensteinJ. (1965) The robustness of homogeneity tests in 2 x N tables, Biometrics, 21, 19–23.
12.
MantelN. and HaenszelW. (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 21, 719–748.
13.
MathewsD. E. and FarewellV. T. (1985) Using and Understanding Medical Statistics, Karger, London.
14.
MizrahiE. (1977a) Retention of the conventional orthodontic band, British Journal of Orthodontics, 71, 190–196.
15.
MizrahiE. (1977b) Further studies in retention of the orthodontic band, Angle Orthodontist, 49, 231–238.
16.
MizrahiE. (1982) Success and failure of banding and bonding. A clinical study, Angle Orthodontist, 52, 113–117.
17.
MizrahiE. (1983) Orthodontic bands and directly bonded brackets: a review of clinical failure rate, Journal of Dentistry, 11, 231–236.
18.
MizrahiE. (1988) Glass ionomer cements in orthodontics—an update, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 93, 505–507.
19.
MooreK. H. (1984) Failure of Orthodontic Bands and Directly Bonded Brackets, British Journal of Orthodontics, 12, 50.
20.
NorrisD. S., McInnes-LedouxP., SchwaningerB. and WeinbergR. (1986) Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-releasing cements, American Journal of Orthodontics, 89, 206–211.
21.
PetoR. (1976) Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I Introduction and design, British Journal of Cancer, 34, 585–612.
22.
PetoR. (1977) Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II Analysis and examples, British Journal of Cancer, 35, 1–39.
23.
PrenticeR. L. (1978) Linear rank tests with right censored data, Biometrika, 65, 167–179.
24.
PrenticeR. L. and MarekP. (1979) A qualitative discrepancy between censored data rank tests, Biometrics, 35, 861–867.
