Thermomechanical modification is a technique that allows wood densification, improving mechanical properties and reducing hygroscopicity. In veneers, this technique is commonly used to improve bonding quality in wood based panels. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of thermomechanical modification on some physical properties of rotary peeled veneers of amescla (Trattinnickia burseraefolia). Veneers were treated in a hydraulic press at 140 and 180°C, for 1 and 2 min at 2·7 N mm−2 pressure. The apparent density was evaluated as well compression ratio, weight loss, equilibrium moisture content, thickness swelling and water absorption. The results showed that apparent density and compression ratio increased after treatment. Equilibrium moisture content values were lower in samples treated at 180°C. Dimensional stability was not improved due to release of compressive stresses. The surface of veneers was modified and its roughness and wettability were reduced significantly.
AkerholmM, SalménL. 2004. Softening of wood polymers induced by moisture studied by dynamic FTIR spectroscopy.J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 94: 2032–2040.
2.
ArrudaLM, GonçalezJC, Del MenezziCHS, MeloRR. 2011. Estudo preliminar das propriedades de compensados produzidos com lâminas de paricá (Schizolobium amazonicum Huber ex Ducke) modificadas termomecanicamente.Ci. Madeira2: 29–42.
3.
ASTM D1037. 2006. Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-base fiber and particle panel materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
4.
ASTM D2395. 2007. Standard test methods for specify gravity for wood and wood-based materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
5.
ASTM D4442. 2007. Standard test methods for direct moisture content measurement of wood and wood-based materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
6.
AydinI, ColakogluG. 2005. Effects of surface inactivation, high temperature drying and preservative treatment on surface roughness and color of alder and beech wood.Appl. Surf. Sci. 252(2): 430–440.
7.
BekhtaP, MarutzkyR. 2007. Reduction of glue consumption in the plywood production by using previously compressed veneer.Holz Roh Werkst.65: 87–88.
8.
BekhtaP, NiemzP, SedliacikJ. 2012. Effect of pre-pressing of veneer on the glueability and properties of veneer-based products.Eur. J. Wood Prod. 70: 99–106.
9.
BhuiyanTR, HiraiN, SobueN. 2000. Changes of crystallinity in wood cellulose by heat treatment under dried and moist conditions.J. Wood Sci. 46: 431–436.
10.
BhuiyanTR, HiraiN, SobueN. 2001. Effect of intermittent heat treatment on crystallinity in wood cellulose.J. Wood Sci. 47: 336–341.
11.
BoonstraMJ, TjeerdsmaB. 2006. Chemical analysis of heat treated softwoods.Holz Roh Werkst.64: 204–211.
12.
CandanZ, HizirogluS, McDonaldAG. 2010. Surface quality of thermally compressed Douglas fir veneer.Mater. Des. 31: 3574–3577.
13.
CloutierA, FangC, MariottiN. 2008. Densification of wood veneers under the effect of heat, steam and pressure. Proc. 51st Int. Conv. of Society of Wood Science and Technology. Conception, Chile, November 2008. Society of Wood Science and Technology. Paper AP-3.
14.
Del MenezziCHS, TomaselliI, OkinoEYA, TeixeiraDE, SantanaMAE. 2009. Thermal modification of consolidated oriented strand board: effects on dimensional stability, mechanical properties, chemical composition and surface color.Holz Roh Werkst.67: 383–396.
15.
Del MenezziCHS, SouzaRQ, ThompsonRM, TeixeiraDE, OkinoEYA. 2008a. Properties after weathering and decay resistance of a thermally modified wood structural board.Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 62: 448–454.
16.
Del MenezziCHS, RibeiroRB, SternadtGH, TeixeiraDE, OkinoEYA. 2008b. Effect of thermal post-treatment on surface related properties of oriented strandboards.Drvna Ind.59(2): 61–67.
17.
Del MenezziCHS, TomaselliI. 2006. Contact thermal post-treatment of oriented strandboard to improve dimensional stability: a preliminary study.Holz Roh Werkst.64: 212–217.
18.
FangC, CloutierA, BlanchetP, KoubaaA. 2012. Densification of wood veneers combined with oil-heat treatment.Part II: Hygroscopicity and mechanical properties. BioResources7: 925–935.
KocaefeD, PoncsakS, BolukY. 2008. Effect of thermal treatment on the chemical composition and mechanical properties of birch and aspen.BioResources3: 517–537.
21.
KorkutDS, KorkutS, BekarI, BudakciM, DilikT, ÇakicierN. 2008. The Effects of heat treatment on the physical properties and surface roughness of Turkish hazel (Corylus colurna L.) wood.Int. J. Mol. Sci. 9: 1772–1783.
22.
KurowskaA, BorysiukP, MaminskiM, ZbiecM. 2010. Veneer densification as a tool for shortening of plywood processing time.Drvna Ind.61: 193–196.
23.
KutnarA, KamkeFA, SernekM. 2009. Density profile and morphology of viscoelastic thermal compressed wood.Wood Sci. Technol. 43: 57–68.
24.
MohebbyB, Gorbani-KokandehM, SoltaniM. 2009. Springback in acetylated wood based composites.Constr. Build. Mater. 23: 3103–3106.
25.
NeeseJL, ReebJE, FunckJW. 2004. Relating traditional surface roughness measures to glue-bond quality in plywood.Forest Prod. J. 54(1): 67–73.
26.
RowellRM, Levan-GreenSL. 2005. Thermal properties. In Rowell 2005, 121–138.
27.
RowellRM, YoungsRL. 1981. Dimensional stabilization of wood in use. Madison, WI: Forest Products Laboratory.
28.
SantosCMT, Del MenezziCHS, SouzaMR. 2012. Properties of thermo-mechanically treated wood from Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis.BioResources7: 1850–1865.
StammAJ, ChidesterGH. 1947. Yearbook of Agriculture 1943–1947 – Part 5. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
31.
WeilandJJ, GuyonnetR. 2003. Study of chemical modifications and fungi degradation of thermally modified wood using DRIFT spectroscopy.Holz Roh Werkst.61: 216–220.
32.
WolcottMP, KamkeFA, DillardDA. 1990. Fundamentals of flakeboard manufacture: viscoelastic behavior of the wood component.Wood Fiber Sci.22: 345–361.
