Finger-jointing round wood segments into straight logs may provide an efficient method for converting small-diameter timber harvested during thinning operations into value-added products. Currently available applications for round wood finger joints appear to be limited. This study investigated the mechanical performance of round wood finger joints using plywood peeler cores. The effects of two joint profiles and two joint orientations on the performance of round wood finger joints were determined. The strength, stiffness and strain variation properties of round wood finger joints were evaluated and compared with those of solid joint-free round wood cores. The strength of finger-jointed round wood segments was found to be less than the strength of solid round wood cores without joints. Both joint profile and joint orientation were found to affect the strength and the strain of round wood finger joints. Finger-joint base strain increased at a greater rate than did finger-joint tip strain during bending tests.
AicherS, KlockW. 1991. Finger joint analysis and optimization by elastic, non-linear and fracture mechanics finite element computations. Proc. Int. Timber Eng. Conf. London, UK, September 1991. Volume 3. TRADA. Pages 3.66–3.76.
2.
American Society for Testing, Materials (ASTM). 2003. Standard test methods of static tests of lumber in structural sizes. ASTM D198-02. West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
3.
AyarkwaJ, HirashimaY, SasakiY. 2000. Effect of finger geometry and end pressure on the flexural properties of finger-jointed tropical African hardwoods.Forest Prod. J. 50(11/12): 53–63.
4.
BeaulieuC, VerreaultC, GosmeC, SamsonM. 1997. Experimental assessment of the effect of length on the tensile strength of structural finger jointed lumber.Forest Prod. J. 47(10): 94–100.
5.
BenderDA, BurkAG, TaylorSE, HooperJA. 1990. Predicting localized MOE and tensile strength in solid and finger-jointed laminating lumber using longitudinal stress waves.Forest Prod. J. 40(3): 45–47.
6.
BiblisEJ, CarinoHF. 1993. Factors influencing the flexural properties of finger-jointed southern pine LVL.Forest Prod. J. 43(1): 41–46.
7.
BurkAG, BenderDA. 1989. Simulating finger-joint performance based on localized constituent lumber properties.Forest Prod. J. 39(3): 45–50.
8.
BustosC, BeauregardR, MohammadM, HernandezRE. 2003. Structural performance of finger-jointed black spruce lumber with different joint configurations.Forest Prod. J. 53(9): 72–76.
9.
BustosC, HernandezRE, BeauregardR, MohammadM. 2004. Influence of machining parameters on the structural performance of finger-joined black spruce.Wood Fib. Sci. 36(3): 359–367.
10.
ByeonHS, ParkHM, KimCH, LamF. 2005. Nondestructive evaluation of strength performance for finger-jointed wood using flexural vibration techniques.Forest Prod. J. 55(10): 37–42.
11.
DagenaisC, SalenikovichA. 2008. Influence of machining parameters on the tensile strength of finger-jointed sugar maple lumber.Wood Fib. Sci. 40(1): 55–61.
12.
DougalEF, KnowlesCD, StameyJD. 2005. Moisture content of structural finger-jointed southern pine following a durability cycle.Forest Prod. J. 55(3): 40–43.
13.
FisettePR, RiceWW. 1988. An analysis of structural finger-joints made from two northeastern species.Forest Prod. J. 38(9): 40–44.
14.
FlachD, HernandezR. 2001. Concentric finger jointed timber. US Patent 65376250.
15.
Forest Products Laboratory (FPL). 1999. Wood handbook – wood as an engineering material. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-113. Page 463.
16.
HascallJA, FallerRF, ReidJD, SickingDL, KretschmannDE. 2007. Investigating the use of small-diameter softwood as guardrail posts (dynamic test results). Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA. MwRSF Res. Rep. TRP-03-179-07. Page 436.
17.
JanowiakJJ, LaboskyP, BlankenhornP.R., ManbeckH.B.1993. Finger-joint strength evaluations of three Northeastern hardwood.Forest Prod. J. 43(9): 23–28.
KentSM, LeichtiRJ. 2005. An assessment of common test methods to evaluate the mechanical properties of structural end-jointed lumber.Forest Prod. J. 55(3): 32–39.
21.
KonnerthJ, VallaA, GindlW, MullerU. 2006. Measurement of strain distribution in timber finger joints.Wood Sci. Technol. 40: 631–636.
22.
KnowlesCD, StameyJD, DougalEF. 2006. The effect of specific gravity and growth rate on bending strength of finger-jointed southern pine.Wood Fiber Sci.38(3): 379–389.
23.
LangEM, HasslerCC. 2007. Strength of Appalachian hardwoods finger-jointed at elevated moisture content.Forest Prod. J. 57(1/2): 29–34.
24.
LichtenbergGJ, EricksonJR, RossR, FlachD. 2003. Joint for connecting wood members. US Patent 6551007.
25.
MilnerHR, YeohE. 1991. Finite element analysis of glued timber finger joints.J. Struct. Eng. 117(3): 755–766.
26.
PageMW. 1959. Finger jointing.Aust. Timber J. 25(5): 82–95.
27.
PellicanePJ. 1994. Finite element analysis of finger-joints in lumber with dissimilar laminate stiffnesses.Forest Prod. J. 44(3): 17–22.
28.
PellicanePJ, GutkowskiRM, JauslinC. 1995. Comparison of optically and mechanically measured deformations in a finger-jointed wood tension specimen.J. Test. Eval. 23(2): 136–140.
29.
PellicanePJ, McMillanKS, TichyRJ. 1987. Effects of knots near the fingers of finger-jointed dimension lumber.Forest Prod. J. 37(5): 13–16.
30.
SamsonM. 1985. Potential of finger-jointed lumber for machine stress-rated lumber grades.Forest Prod. J. 35(7/8): 20–24.
SmardzewskiJ. 1995. Distribution of stresses in finger joints.Wood Sci. Tech. 30: 477–489.
33.
VrazelM, SellersTJr. 2004. The effects of species, adhesive type, and cure temperature on the strength and durability of a structural finger-joint.Forest Prod. J. 54(3): 66–75.
