In this paper, are described a series of tests that have been undertaken to elucidate the effects of geometry, material properties and reinforcement location on the flexural properties of laminated veneer lumber. The fracture modes are found to be a function of the properties and location of the reinforcement and ultimately the strength of bonding between the components. The use of high modulus reinforcements is beneficial to enhancing the stiffness of laminated veneer lumber, whereas lower stiffness reinforcements are beneficial for the enhancement of strength. Lowered fractions of rod and plate reinforcement are as beneficial as higher fractions of rod and plate reinforcement in reinforcing timber, provided they are judiciously positioned in the timber and have a stable bond.
BanS, TsubotaH, MotohashiS, YoshidaA. 1999. Nagano Olympic memorial arena. Proc. Pacific Timber Engineering Conf. Rotorua, New Zealand, March 1999. Timber Systems Limited. Vol. 1, Pages 139–230.
2.
BelperioP. 1999. The performance of glulam beams reinforced with carbon fibre. Proc. Pacific Timber Engineering Conf. Rotorua, New Zealand, March 1999. Timber Systems Limited. Vol. 1, Pages 99–106.
3.
BorginKB, LoedolffGF, SaundersGR. 1968. Laminated wood beams reinforced with steel strips.ASCE J. Struct. Div. 94(ST7): 1681–1705.
4.
BrunnerM, SchnuerigerM. 2004. Timber beams strengthened with prestressed fibres: delamination. Proc. 8th World Conf. on Timber Engineering. Lahti, Finland, June 2004. University of Ljubljana. Vol. 1, Pages 345–350.
5.
BS 4360. 1986. Hot rolled weldable structural steel. British Standards Institution, London, UK.
6.
ChajesMJ, KaliakinVN, HolsingerSD, MeyerAJ. 1995. Experimental testing of composite wood beams for use in timber bridges. Proc. 4th Int. Bridge Conf., Pittsburg, PA, USA, June 1995. Transportation Research Board. Vol. 2, Pages 371–380.
7.
ColemanGE, HurstHT. 1974. Timber structures reinforced with light gage steel.For. Prod. J. 24(7): 45–53.
8.
DoreyAB, ChengJJR. 1996a. Development of a composite glued laminated timber. Canadian Forest Service & Land and Forest Service, Canada.
9.
DoreyAB, ChengJJR. 1996b. Glass fibre reinforced glued laminated wood beams. Canadian Forest Service & Land and Forest Service, Canada.
10.
DziubaT. 1985. The ultimate strength of wooden beams with tension reinforcement.Holzforsch. Holzverwert. 37(6): 115–119.
11.
GilfillanR, GilbertS, PatrickG. 2001. The improved performance of home-grown timber glulam beams using fibre reinforcement.J. Inst. Wood Sci. 15(6): 307–317.
12.
HallströmS, GrenestedtJL. 1997. Failure analysis of laminated timber beams reinforced with glass fibre reinforcement.Wood Sci. Technol. 31(1): 17–34.
13.
HoyleRJ. 1975. Steel-reinforced wood beam design.For. Prod. J. 25(4): 17–23.
14.
ItagakiN, IijimaY, MihashiH. 2003. Design method of mechanical performance in fibre reinforced glulam beams. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Eur. Soc. Wood Mech., Stockholm, Sweden, May 2003. European Society of Wood Mechanics. Pages 337–342.
15.
JohnsKC, LacroixS. 2000. Composite reinforcement of timber in bending.Can. J. Civil Eng. 27: 899–906.
16.
JonesR. 1997. Upgrading of timber members in historic buildings.J. Inst. Wood Sci. 14(4): 192–203.
17.
PetersonJ. 1965. Wood beams prestressed with bonded tension elements.ASCE J. Struct. Div. 91(ST1): 103–119.
18.
Ranta-MaunusA. 1995. Laminated veneer lumber and other structural sections. STEP/EUROFORTECH, Vol. 1 A9, Centrum Hout, The Netherlands.
