Low permeability in wood can cause limited retention and penetration of preservative which ultimately affects the wood performance in the field. In the present study, Malaysian red, yellow and white meranti of the Shorea group were selected for evaluation of treatability using commercial copper–chrome–arsenate and ZiBOC – a new preservative system, by the vacuum pressure method at two pressure levels in unsealed and end sealed specimens. A significant difference (P<0·05) in retention levels of both the preservatives was observed in sapwood, heartwood and pith zones. White meranti exhibited treatability class ‘a’ while mottled penetration was observed in red and yellow meranti exhibiting class ‘c’. The spot test for boron, zinc and copper in unsealed and end sealed specimens revealed that longitudinal penetration was not the dominant flow in red and yellow meranti.
AniS, SalamahS, DahlanMJ, SalmiahU, RoszainiK. 2005. Durability of timbers for indoor applications in Malaysia.Timber Technol. Bull. 37: 139–258.
2.
AshtonPS. 2004. Dipterocarpaceae. In Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak, Vol. 5, edited by , SoepadmoE, SawL G, ChungR C K, ed. Kuala Lumpur: FRIM.
3.
BhatiaTK. 2002. Use of borate-treated wood as part of an IPM approach for durable and sustainable construction. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Urban Pests, Charleston, SC, USA, IUPC, July 2002. 269–275. http://www.icup.org.uk/reports%5CICUP228.pdf
4.
BonhamM, O'ConnorJM, HanniganBM, StrainJJ. 2002. The immune system as a physiological indicator of marginal copper status?Br. J. Nutr. 87: 393–403.
5.
British Wood Preserving Association. 1956. Timber preservation. London: British Wood Preserving Association.
6.
ChooKT, LimSC. 1982. Malaysian timbers – dark red meranti. Malaysian Forest Service Trade Leaflet no. 69. The Malaysian Timber Industry Board and Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
7.
ChooKT, GanKS, LimSC. 1998. Timber notes – light hardwoods I. Timber Technology Bulletin no. 9. Timber Technology Centre (TTC), FRIM, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
8.
CollardetJ. 1976. Processing hard-to-process and lesser used species. Unasylva 28(112–113): 42–51.
9.
CoteWA. 1990. In search of pathway through wood. Proc. Ann. Meet. of American Wood Preserver's Association, Stevensville, MD, USA, April 1990. American Wood Preserver's Association, Vol. 86, 97–105.
10.
DevI, BaggaJK, KumarS. 1997. Termite resistance and permanency test on zinc borate an environmental friendly preservative.J. Timb. Dev. Assoc. (Ind.)43(2): 10–15.
11.
GreavesH, 1974. A review of the influence of structural anatomy on liquid penetration into hard woods. J. of the Inst. of Wood Sci. 6(6): 37–40.
12.
FreemanMH, McIntyreCR. 2008. A comprehensive review of copper based wood preservatives with a focus on new micronized or dispersed copper systems.For. Prod. J. 58(11): 6–27.
13.
HambridgeM. 2000. Human zinc deficiency.J. Nutr. 130: 13445–13495.
14.
HuntGM, GarrattGA. 1967. Wood preservation. 3rd ed. The American Forestry Series. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
IS 2753 (Part-1). 1991. Methods for estimation of preservatives in treated timber and in treating solutions: Part 1. Deterrmination of copper, arsenic, chromium, zinc, boron, creosote and fuel oil. Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhawan, New Delhi, India.
16.
IS 401. 2001. Preservation of timber code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhawan, New Delhi, India.
17.
KimG-H, KimJ-J. 2001. Effect of moisture content on treatability of Japanese red pine, Japanese larch, and ezo spruce with chromated copper arsenate.For. Prod. J. 51: 1–7.
18.
MenonPKB. 1986. Uses of some Malaysian timbers. Revised by S. C. Lim. Timber Trade Leaflet no. 31. The Malaysian Timber Industry Board and Forest Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.
19.
PandeyPK, BhandariK, SinghM. 2007. In Utilization manual of Malayan shorea timbers. Dehradun: Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education.
20.
PanshinAJ, DeZeeuwC. 1980. Text book of wood technology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
21.
PettyJA, PrestonRD. 1969. The dimension and number of pit membrane pores in conifer wood.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B172: 137–51.
22.
StammAJ. 1970. Maximum effective pit pore radii of the heartwood and sapwood of six soft wood as affected by drying and reasoking.Wood Fiber.1(4): 263–69.
23.
ThévenonMF, TondiG, PizziA, 2010. Envir onmentally friendly wood preservative system based on polymerised tannin rasin- boric acid for outdoor applications.Maderas Ciencia Y Tecnologia12(3): 253–257
24.
ThomasRJ, KringstadKP. 1971. The role of hydrogen bonding in pit aspiration.Holzforschung25(5): 148.
25.
ThomasRJ, NicholasDD. 1966. Pit membrane structure in loblolly pine influenced by solvent exchange drying.For. Prod. J. 16(3): 57–59.
26.
TripathiS. 2005. Report on evaluation of Radiata pine from New Zealand. New Delhi: Ace Global.
27.
TripathiS. 2008. New eco-friendly, economical and non-hazardous wood preservative ZiBOC – comparable to CCA. Patent Filed 264/Del/2008. India
28.
TripathiS, BaggaJK, JainVK. 2005. Preliminary studies on ZiBOC – a potential ecofrieldly preservative. Proc. 36th Ann. Meet. of International Research Group on Wood Protection. Bangalore, India, April 2005. International Research Group on Wood Protection. IRG/WP/05-30372.
29.
WiemannMC. 2010. Characteristics and availability of commercially important woods. Wood handbook. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190. 2-1–2-45.
30.
WilsonA, YostP. 2000. Safer pest control – management of wood-destroying insects.Environ. Build. News9(9): 20.
31.
WolfgangM, SandsteadH. 2006. Zinc requirements and the risks and benefits of zinc supplementation.J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 20: 3–18.
