Heads of 17 markedly bio-damaged fir beams, proposed for replacement in historical ceilings, were subjected to in situ and in vitro analyses. At in situ tests, average velocities of ultrasonic wave (UW) in transverse directions c⊥ (height and width) were significantly lower in parts 0·1–0·2 m off the ends (300–400 m s−1) than in those 0·5–1·0 m off the ends (700–1100 m s−1). Average velocities of UW in longitudinal direction ║ reached 1875–5598 m s−1. At in vitro tests, tight linear correlations between densities, dynamic MOEd (determined by ultrasonic), static MOE and MOR (determined by bending) were observed for 153 specimens prepared from the beams. In vitro parameters MOEd, MOE and MOR corresponded well with in situ ultrasonic parameter c⊥. Relations between in situ and in vitro results could help better evaluate bio-defects in historical timber structures.
AdamC, Ahmed-ShidayBM, BrodieG. 2010. Non-destructive evaluation of termite and decay damaged to timber-in-service.International Research Group on Wood Protection, Stockholm, Sweden. Document no. IRG/WP 10-20451.
2.
AritaK, MitsutaniS, SakaiH, TomikawaY. 1986. Detection of decay in the interior of a wood post by ultrasonic method.Mokuzai Kogyo41(8): 370–375.
3.
BauerC, KilbertusG, BucurV. 1991. Technique ultrasonore de caracterisation du dégré d'alternation des bois de hêtre et de pin soumis a l'attaque de diferents champignos.Holzforschung45: 41–46.
4.
BucurV. 1995. Acoustics of wood. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc.
5.
BucurV, RasolofosaonPNJ. 1998. Dynamic elastic and nonlinearity in wood and rock.Ultrasonics36: 813–824.
6.
EfransjahF, KilberusG, BucurV. 1989. Impact of water storage on mechanical properties of spruce as detected by ultrasonics.Wood Sci. Technol. 23(1): 35–42.
7.
GalliganW, KernsJ. 2002. Mechanical grading of lumber. In Pellerin and Ross 2002, 93–127.
8.
GrindaM, GollerS. 2005. Some experiences with stake tests at BAM test field and in the BAM fungus cellar. Part 2: Comparison of static and dynamic moduli of elasticity (MOE). International Research Group on Wood Protection, Stockholm, Sweden. Document no. IRG/WP 05-20320.
9.
KloiberM, BláhaJ. 2005. Nedestruktivní identifikace poškození dřevěných nosných konstrukcí u památkově chráněných objektu. (Non-destructive testing of damages in timber structures at heritage protected objects). Proc. 4th Conf. on Wood-destroying Fungi 2005. Zvolen, Slovakia, September 2005. TU Zvolen.Pages 69–75.
10.
KotlinováM, KloiberM. 2007. Vizuálne zist'ovanie vlastností historického dreva. (Visual evaluation of properties of historical woods). Proc. 5th Conf. on Wood-destroying Fungi 2007. Brno, Czech Republic, June 2007. MZLU Brno. Pages 100–110.
11.
KursalovicJT, LeónLA, GaeteL. 2000. Ultrasonic detection of knots and annual ring orientation in Pinus radiata Lumber.Wood Fiber Sci.32(3): 278–286.
12.
LiangS, HuN, LinL, FuF. 2009. Detection and assessment healthy situation of Poulus eupharatica Oliv. with stress wave. International Research Group on Wood Protection, Stockholm, Sweden. Document no. IRG/WP 09–20415.
13.
MacedoA, VazC, PereiraJ, NaimeJ, CruvinelP, CrestanaS. 2002. Wood density determination by X- and gamma-ray tomography.Holzforschung56(5): 535–540.
14.
MachekL, MilitzH, Sierra-AlvarezR. 1998. A dynamic approach to assess the modulus of elasticity in wood decay testing. International Research Group on Wood Protection, Stockholm, Sweden. Document no. IRG/WP 98-20139.
15.
MakovínyI, ReinprechtL. 1990. Možnosti stanovenia hniloby dreva formou jeho elektrofyzikálnych vlastností. (Rot in wood determined by its electro-physical properties). Proc. 8th Conf. on Wood Protection. May 2010.Bratislava, Slovakia, DT Bratislava. Pages 70–74.
16.
MarčokM, ReinprechtL, BeničákJ, PolášekJ, DankoP. 1996. Detection of biodegradation processes in specimens from damaged spruce beam by means of ultrasonic and microwave methods. Proc. 3rd International Colloqium on Acoustics ’96. Zvolen, Slovakia. TU Zvolen. Pages 5–13.
17.
MorethU, SchmidtO. 2000. Identification of indoor rot fungi by taxon-specific priming polymerase chain reaction.Holzforschung54(1): 1–8.
18.
PellerinRF, RossRJ. 2002a. Transverse vibration and longitudinal stress wave nondestructive evaluation methods. In Pellerin and Ross 2002, 13–35.
19.
PellerinRF, RossRJ. 2002b. Inspection of timber structures using stress wave timing nondestructive evaluation tools. In Pellerin and Ross 2002, 135–148.
20.
PeyloA, BechgaardCG. 2006. Field tests on poles – a report from practice.International Research Group on Wood Protection, Stockholm, Sweden. Document no. IRG/WP 06-20343.
21.
PiazzaM, RiggioM. 2006. Limits of visual strength grading: old timber roof beams of ‘Al Caduti Dell Adamello’ Refuse. Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Extending the life of bridges, concrete, composites, building, masonry, civil structures. Edinburgh, Engineering Technics Press, UK, June 2006. Page 13.
22.
ReinprechtL. 2008. Dendrologický posudok na skutkový stav drevených stropov na objekte Limpacherov dom, námestie Svätej trojice 5 v Banskej Štiavnici.(Wooden report on the actual state of ceilings in the Limpacher's house, Triple square No. 5 in Banská Štiavnica). Sliač, Slovakia. Expert Report No. 9/2008.
23.
ReinprechtL. 2009. Diagnostic of the degraded zones of fir beam situated in the st.Egidius’ basilica in Bardejov. Ann. Warszaw Univ. Life Sci. SGGW For. Wood Technol. 67: 201–207.
24.
ReinprechtL, HrivnákJ. 2010. Stanovenie hniloby i iných defektov v drevených prvkoch ultrazvukom a odporovým vrtákom – v kostole v Trnovom a nedokončenom zrube. (Determination of rot and other defects in wooden elements by ultrasonic method and by Resistograph – in ancient wooden church in Trnovo and in one new un-completed log house). Proc. 32nd Conf. of Sanace a rekonstrukce staveb. November 2010, Brno, Czech Republik, WTA Brno. Pages 33–40.
25.
ReinprechtL, ŠtefkoJ. 2000. Dřevené stropy a krovy – typy, poruchy, prúzkumy a rekonstrukce. (Wooden ceiling and roof constructions – types, defects, investigations and renovations). Praha: ABF-ARCH.
26.
SenftJS, SuddarthSK, AngletonHD. 1962. A new approach to stress grading of lumber.For. Prod. J. 12(4): 183–186.
27.
Standards:EN338 , Eurocode 5, UNI 11119:2004.
28.
TemizA, YildizUC. 2006. The use of modulus of elasticity and modulus of rupture to assess wood decay in laboratory soil-bed test. International Research Group on Wood Protection, Stockholm, Sweden. Document no. IRG/WP 06-20338.
