From rational and micromechanical arguments on energy levels of particle/particle and particle/ fluid interactions, we first provide here a conceptual diagram of predominant interactions within flowing cement pastes under simple shear in steady state as a function of shear rate and solid volume fraction. We focus then on what is universal and common to all polymers used in the cement construction industry and describe at first order the main changes in the underlying physics occurring when such molecules are added to a cement suspension. We finally discuss the upscaling between cement paste rheology and concrete fresh properties.
de LarrardF., Concrete Mixture Proportioning, E & FN Spon, London, 1999.
2.
BanfillP. F. G. and SaundersD. C.: ‘On the viscosimetric examination of cement pastes’, Cem. Concr. Res., 1981, 11, 363–370. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(81)90108-3
3.
ToutouZ. and RousselN.: ‘Multi scale experimental study of concrete rheology: from water scale to gravel scale’, Mater. Struct., 2006, 37, 167–176.
4.
RousselN.: ‘Steady and transient flow behaviour of fresh cement pastes’, Cem. Concr. Res., 2005, 35, 1656–1664. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.08.001
5.
RousselN., OvarlezG., GarraultS., BrumaudC.: ‘The origins of thixotropy of fresh cement pastes’, Cem. Concr. Res., 2012, 42, 148–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.09.004
6.
CoussotP. and AnceyC.: ‘Rheophysical classification of concentrated suspensions and granular pastes’, Phys. Rev. E, 2009, 59 E, 4445.
7.
PerrotA., LecompteT., KhelifiH., BrumaudC., HotJ. and RousselN.: ‘Yield stress and bleeding of fresh cement pastes’, Cem. Concr. Res., 2012, 42, 937–944. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.015
RousselN., LemaitreA., FlattR. J. and CoussotP.: ‘Steady state flow of cement suspensions: A micromechanical state of the art’, Cem. Concr. Res., 2010, 40, (1), 77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.026
10.
HotJ., Bessaies-BeyH., BrumaudC., DucM., CastellaC. and RousselN.: ‘Adsorbing polymers and viscosity of cement pastes’, Cem. Concr. Res., 2014, 63, 12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.04.005
11.
OvarlezG., BertrandF. and RodtsS.: ‘Local determination of the constitutive law of a dense suspension of non-colloidal particles through magnetic resonance imaging’, J. Rheol., 2006, 50, 259–292. doi: 10.1122/1.2188528
12.
BrumaudC., BaumannR., SchmitzM., RadlerM. and RousselN., ‘Cellulose ethers and yield stress of cement pastes’, Cem. Concr. Res., 2014, 55, 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.06.013
13.
FlattR. J., SchoberI., RaphaelE., PlassardC. and LesniewskaE., ‘Conformation of Adsorbed Comb Copolymer Dispersants’, Langmuir, 2009, 25, (2), 845–855. doi: 10.1021/la801410e
14.
KjeldsenA. M., FlattR. J. and BergströmL.: ‘Relating the molecular structure of comb-type superplasticizers to the compression rheology of MgO suspensions’, Cem. Concr. Res., 2006, 36, 1231–1239. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.019
15.
Bessaies-BeyH.: ‘Polymères et propriétés rhéologiques d'une pâte de ciment: une approche physique générique’, PhD thesis, Univ. Paris Est, Paris, France, 2015.
16.
MahautF., ChateauX., CoussotP. and OvarlezG.: ‘Yield stress and elastic modulus of suspensions of noncolloidal particles in yield stress fluids’, J. Rheol., 2008, 52, 287–313. doi: 10.1122/1.2798234
17.
MahautF., MokeddemS., ChateauX., RousselN. and OvarlezG.: ‘Effect of coarse particle volume fraction on the yield stress and thixotropy of cementitious materials’, Cem. Concr. Res., 2008b, 38, (11), 1276–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.06.001
18.
OnodaG. Y. and LinigerE. G.: ‘Random loose packings of uniform spheres and the dilatancy onset’, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1990, 64, 2727–2730. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2727
19.
YammineJ., ChaoucheM., GuerinetM., MoranvilleM. and RousselN.: ‘From ordinary rheology concrete to self compacting concrete: a transition between frictional and hydrodynamic interactions’, Cem. Concr. Res., 2008, 38, 890–896. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.03.011
20.
MansoutreS., ColombetP. and DammeH. Van: ‘Water retention and granular rheological behaviour of fresh C3S paste as function of concentration’, Cem. Concr. Res., 1999, 29, 1441–1453. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00129-5
