The effects of poling state and pores on the fracture toughness of Pb(Zr0·95Ti0·05)O3 (PZT 95/5) ferroelectric ceramics were investigated. X-ray diffraction analysis and piezoelectric constant measurements reveal that the phase structures of PZT 95/5 ceramics change with the poling state, which significantly affects the fracture toughness. The poled PZT 95/5 ceramics demonstrate higher fracture toughness than the unpoled ceramics, and their fracture toughness significantly increases after the pressure depoling. As the porosity of ceramics increases with addition of poreformer during preparation, their fracture toughnesses all decrease accordingly either in poled state or unpoled state. The effect of pore size on the fracture toughness is subtle for the poled ceramics, but for the hydrostatic pressure depoled porous PZT 95/5 ceramics, their fracture toughness increases with the increase in pore size. A new stress model is proposed to explain the pore size effect on the fracture toughness of hydrostatic pressure depoled PZT 95/5 ceramics.
HaertlingGH: ‘Ferroelectric ceramics: history and technology’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1999, 82, (4), 797–818.
3.
NeilsonFW: ‘Effects of strong shocks in ferroelectric materials’, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 1957, 2, 302–305.
4.
LysnePC, BartelLC: ‘Electromechanical response of PZT 65/35 subjected to axial shock loading’, J. Appl. Phys., 1975, 46, (1), 222–229.
5.
LysnePC, PercivalCM: ‘Electric energy generation by shock compression of ferroelectric ceramics: Normal-mode response of PZT 95/5’, J. Appl. Phys., 1975, 46, (4), 1519–1525.
6.
DunganRH, StorzLJ: ‘Relation between chemical, mechanical and electrical properites of Nb2O5-modified 95 mol% PbZrO3-5 mol% PbTiO3’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1985, 68, (10), 530–533.
7.
StorzJ, DunganRH: ‘A study of the electrical, mechanical and microstructrual properties of 95/5PZT as a function of pore former type and concentration’, Sandia Report SAND85-1612, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1985.
8.
ZengT, DongXL, YangH, MaoCL, ChenH: ‘Enhancement of mechanical and dielectric breakdown properties by diffusion of SiC into lead zirconate titanate ceramics’, Scr. Mater., 2006, 55, (10), 923–926.
9.
AkiraK, KunihitoKo, HiroakiY: ‘Mechanical and dielectric failure of BaTiO3 ceramics’, J. Mater. Sci., 1989, 24, (2), 698–702.
10.
KarunM, VirkarAV: ‘Fracture mechanisms in ferroelectric-ferroelastic lead zirconate titanate (Zr: Ti = 0.54:0.46) ceramics’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1990, 73, (131), 567–574.
11.
Calderon-MorenoJM, GuiuF, MeredithM, ReeceMJ: ‘Fracture toughness anisotropy of PZT’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1997, A234–A236, 1062–1066.
12.
RiceRW: ‘Porosity of ceramic’; 1998, New York, Marcel Dekker.
13.
ZengT, DongXL, MaoCL, ZhouZY, YangH: ‘Effects of pore shape and porosity on the properties of porous PZT 95/5 ceramics’, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2007, 27, (4), 2025–2029.
14.
‘Tesing methods for fracture toughness of fine ceramics’, R1607, JIS, Japan, 1995.
15.
WangJX, YangSY, WangJ, HeHL, XiongY, ChenF: ‘Phase, crystal struture and sintering behavior of shock-synthesized Pb(Zr0.95Ti0.05)O3 powders’, Solid State Sci., 2012, 12, (12), 2054–2058.
HallDA, EvansJD, Covey-CrumpSJ, HollowayRF, OliverEC, MoriT, WithersPJ: ‘Effects of superimposed electric field and porosity on the hydrostatic pressure-induced rhombohedral to orthorhombic martensitic phase transformation in PZT95/5 ceramics’, Acta Mater., 2010, 58, (20), 6584–6591.
PisarenkoGG, ChushkoVM, KovalevSP: ‘Anisotropy of fracture toughness of piezoelectric ceramics’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1985, 68, (5), 259–265.
20.
KarunM, VirkarAV: ‘Fracture mechanisms in ferroelectric-ferroelastic lead zirconate titanate (Zr: Ti = 0.54:0.46) ceramics’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1990, 73, (131), 567–574.
21.
McMeekingRM, EvansAG: ‘Mechanics of transformation-toughening in brittle materials’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1982, 65, (5), 242–246.
22.
KishimotoA, KoumotoK, YanagidaH, NamekiM: ‘Microstructure dependence of mechanical and dielectric strengths—i. porosity’, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1991, 40, 927–930.
23.
SetchellRE, TuttleBA, VoigtJA: ‘Effects of microstructural variables on the shock wave response of PZT 95/5’, Sandia Report SAND2003-0537, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2003.
24.
NieHC, DongXL, FengNB, ChenXF, WangGS, GuY, LiangHL, LiuYS: ‘Microgeometry effect on the properties of Pb0.99(Zr0.95Ti0.05)0.98Nb0.02O3 ferroelectric ceramics’, Mater. Res. Bull., 2011, 46, (8), 1243–1246.
25.
HammerM, HoffmannMJ: ‘Sintering model for mixed-oxide-derived lead zirconate titanate ceramics’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1998, 81, (12), 3277–3284.
26.
YangJF, OhjiT, KanzakiS, DiazA, HampshireS: ‘Microstructure and mechanical properties of silicon nitride ceramics with controlled porosity’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2002, 85, (6), 1512–1516.
