Among low cost or readily available raw materials, reservoir clay sediments are of interest as potential precursors in geopolymer binder manufacture. These materials come from dredging of reservoirs because periodical sediment removal is necessary in order to keep a satisfactory level of functionality. In this paper, two sediments, coming from reservoirs located in Southern Italy, have undergone preliminary characterisation by X-ray diffraction, differential thermogravimetry and Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Then, the sediments were submitted to 1 and 2 h calcination treatments at 650 and 750°C. The effects of calcination were evaluated by means of 27Al magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance and FTIR. The calcined samples were mixed with 5M NaOH solution, and the obtained mixtures were studied for reactivity by means of differential scanning calorimetry. Finally, cylindrical samples were prepared with the same mixtures and cured for 3 days at 60°C plus 4 and 25 days at room temperature. The obtained samples were subjected to unconfined compressive strength determinations in order to verify the actual occurrence of geopolymerisation. The results show that the calcined clay sediments can be suitable precursors in polycondensation reactions.
DavidovitsJ: ‘Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials’, J. Therm. Anal., 1991, 37, 1633–1656.
3.
Van JaarsveldJGS, Van DeventerJSJ: ‘Effect of the alkali metal activator on the properties of fly-ash-based geopolymers’, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1999, 38, (10), 3932–3941.
4.
CioffiR, MaffucciL, SantoroL: ‘Optimization of geopolymer synthesis by calcination and polycondensation of a kaolinitic residue’, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2003, 40, (1), 27–38.
5.
AndiniS, CioffiR, ColangeloF, MontagnaroF, SantoroL: ‘Coal fly ash as raw material for the manufacture of geopolymer-based products’, Waste Manage., 2008, 28, (2), 416–423
6.
FeroneC, ColangeloF, CioffiR, MontagnaroF, SantoroL: ‘Mechanical performances of weathered coal fly ash based geopolymer bricks’, Procedia Eng., 2011, 21, 745–752.
7.
PalomoA, MaciasA, BlancoMT, PuertasF: ‘Physical, chemical and mechanical characterization of geopolymers’, Proc. of the 9th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, New Delhi, India, National Council for Cement and Building Materials (NCCBM), 1992, Vol. 5, 505–511.
ChenJH, HuangJS, ChangYW: ‘A preliminary study of reservoir sludge as a raw material of inorganic polymer’, Constr. Build. Mater., 2009, 23, 3264–3269.
14.
FonsecaRMF, BarrigaFJAS, ConceiçãoPIST: ‘Clay minerals in sediments of Portuguese reservoirs and their significance as weathering products from over-eroded soils: a comparative study of the Maranhão, Monte Novo and Divor Reservoirs (South Portugal)’, Int. J. Earth Sci., 2010, 99, (8), 1899–1916.
15.
VaninoS: Report INEA (Italian Institute of Agricultural Economics), Italian Institute of Agricultural Economics, Rome, Italy, 2009.
16.
BernardoG, BiscioneA, MarroccoliM, MolinoB: ‘Reservoir rehabilitation by the sediment evacuation pipeline system and sediment utilization as raw material for the cement industry’, Proc. Int. Conf. on ‘New trends in water and environmental engineering for safety and life’, Capri, Italy, Balkema Publisher, The Netherlands, Maione, Majone Lehto & Monti (Eds.), 3 - 7 July 2000, 60.
17.
ChiangKJ, ChienKL, HwangSJ: ‘Study on the characteristics of building bricks produced from reservoir sediment’, J. Hazard. Mater., 2008, 159, 499–504.
18.
TangCW, ChenHJ, WangSJ, SpauldingJ: ‘Production of synthetic lightweight aggregate using reservoir sediments for concrete and masonry’, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2011, 33, 292–300.
19.
LiaoYC, HuangCY: ‘Effects of CaO addition on lightweight aggregates produced from water reservoir sediment’, Constr. Build. Mater., 2011, 25, 2997–3002.
20.
LiaoYC, HuangCY: ‘Effects of heat treatment on the physical properties of lightweight aggregate from water reservoir sediment’, Ceram. Int., 2011, 37, (8), 3723–3730.
21.
MontagnaroF, SalatinoP, ScalaF, ChironeR: ‘An assessment of water and steam reactivation of a fluidized bed spent sorbent for enhanced SO2 capture’, Powder Technol., 2008, 180, 129–134.
22.
MontagnaroF, NobiliM, TelescaA, ValentiGL, AnthonyEJ, SalatinoP: ‘Steam hydration–reactivation of FBC ashes for enhanced in situ desulphurization’, Fuel, 2009, 88, 1092–1098.
23.
MontagnaroF, BrachiP, SalatinoP: ‘Char-wall interaction and properties of slag waste in entrained-flow gasification of coal’, Energy Fuels, 2011, 25, 3671–3677.
24.
MendeloviciE: ‘Comparative study of the effects of thermal and mechanical treatments on the structures of clay minerals’, J. Therm. Anal., 1997, 49, (3), 1385–1397.
25.
BuchwaldA, HohmannM, PosernK, BrendlerE: ‘The suitability of thermal activated illite/smectite clay as raw material for geopolymer binders’, Appl. Clay Sci., 2009, 46, 300–304.
26.
Italian Environment Ministry Decree, no. 152, V Title, IV Part, 2 May 2006.
27.
TyagiB, ChudasamaCD, JasraRV: ‘Determination of structural modification in acid activated montmorillonite clay by FT-IR spectroscopy’, Spectrochim. Acta A, 2006, 64A, 273–278.
28.
ShahrakiBK, MehrabiB, GholizadehK, MohammadinasabM: ‘Thermal behavior of calcite as expansive agent’, J. Min. Metall. B, 2011, 47B, (1), 89–97.
29.
SabirBB, WildS, BaiJ: ‘Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: a review’, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2001, 23, (6), 441–454.
30.
ZuhuaZ, XiaoY, HuajunZ, YueC: ‘Role of water in the synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer’, Appl. Clay Sci., 2009, 43, 218–223.
31.
ChenJH, HuangJS, ChangYW: ‘Use of reservoir sludge as a partial replacement of metakaolin in the production of geopolymers’, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2011, 33, 602–610.
