Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Many components used in the aerospace industry have complex shape and are manufactured from high strength materials. Performing large scale tests is costly and time consuming, therefore, simulation tools are needed to support an effective product development process. Using manufacturing simulations during product development requires a validated model of the material and manufacturing process. In this paper, a validation scheme is proposed for thermomechanical models of welding and post-weld heat treatment. The scheme was investigated by comparing simulations using shell elements with experimental results, which showed good agreement when predicting residual stresses after welding, but an overestimation of the out-of-plane deformations when simulating both welding and heat treatment. However, the simulations showed that the outof-plane deformation is strongly influenced by the initial geometry. It can be concluded that the simulation model is adequately accurate to be used in concept evaluation.

Keywords

SIMULATION WELDING POST-WELD HEAT TREATMENT VALIDATION MARTENSITIC STAINLESS STEEL

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Belytschko

and Mish

: Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 2001, 52, 3–21.

Runnemalm

: ‘Efficient finite element modelling and simulation of welding’, PhD thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden, 1999.

Zacharia

, Vitek

J. M.

, Goldak

J. A.

, DebRoy

T. A.

, Rappaz

and Bhadeshia

H. K. D. H.

: Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 1995, 3, 265–288.

Oberkampf

W. L.

and Trucano

T. G.

: Proc. Fluids 2000 Conference and Exhibit, Denver CO, USA, June 2000, AIAA, Paper 2000–2549.

Satoh

: Trans. JWRI, 1972, 3, (1), 125–134.

Lindgren

L. E.

: J. Therm. Stresses, 2001, 24, 195–231.

Berglund

, Lindgren

L. E.

and Lundbäck

: Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on ‘Numerical methods in industrial forming processes’, Toyohashi, Japan, June 2001, (ed. K. Mori), 1119–1125.

Stone

H. J.

, Roberts

S. M.

and Reed

R. C.

: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2000, 31A, 2261–2273.

Mathar

: Trans. ASME, 1934, 56, (4), 249–254.

10.

Prime

M. B.

, Hill

M. R.

, DeWald

A. T.

, Sebring

R. J.

, Dave

V.R.

and Cola

M. J.

: Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on ‘Trends in welding research’, Pine Mountain, GA, USA, April 2003, ASM International, 891–896.

11.

James

M. R.

and Cohen

J. B.

: Treatise Mater. Sci. Technol., 1980, 19A, 1–62.

12.

Yang

, Chen

, Dong

, Martin

and Michael

: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on ‘Computer technology in welding’, Columbus OH, USA, December 2001, National Institute of Standards Technology, 203–210.

13.

Sudnik

, Radaj

and Erofeew

: Proc. 4th Seminar on ‘Numerical analysis of weldability’, Graz, Austria, September 1997, Institute of Materials, 477–493.

14.

Deo

M. V.

, Michelaris

and Sun

: Sci. Technol. Welding Joining, 2003, 8, 55–61.

15.

Alberg

and Berglund

: Comp. Methods in Applied Mechanics Engineering, 2003, 192, 5189–5208.

16.

Berglund

Alberg

and Runnemalm

: Finite Element Analysis Design, 2003, 39, 865–881.

17.

MSC Sofware : ‘MARC-theory and user information’, 2003, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

18.

Hibbit

H. D.

and Marcal

P. V.

: Comp. & Struct., 1973, 3, 1145–1174.

19.

Ueda

and Yamakawa

: Trans. JWRI, 1971, 2, 90–100.

20.

Ueda

and Yamakawa

: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on ‘Mechanical behavior of materials’, Kyoto, Japan, August 1971, Society of Materials Science, 10–20.

21.

Goldak

, Oddy

, McDill

, Chakravarti

, Bibby

and House

: Proc. Int. Conf. on ‘Advances in welding science and technology’, Gatlinburg, TN, USA, May 1986, ASM International, 523–527.

22.

Roberts

S. M.

, Stone

H. J.

, Robinson

J. M.

, Withers

P. J.

, Reed

R. C.

, Crooke

D. R.

, Glassey

B. J.

and Horwood

D. J.

: Proc. 4th Int. Seminar on ‘Numerical analysis of weldability’, Graz, Austria, September 1997, Institute of Materials, 631–648.

23.

Lindgren

L. E.

and Karlsson

: Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 1988, 25, 635–655.

24.

Karlsson

R. I.

and Josefson

B. L.

: J. Press. Vess. Technol., 1990, 112, 76–84.

25.

Goldak

, Chakravarti

and Bibby

: Metall. Trans., 1984, 15B, 299–305.

26.

Rybicki

E. F.

, Schmueser

D. W.

, Stonesifer

R. B.

, Groom

J. J.

and Mishler

H. W.

: Proc. ASME Winter Annual Meeting 1977, Atlanta GA, USA, November 1977, ASME, 131–147.

27.

Donzella

, Granzotto

, Amici

, Ghidini

and Bertelli

: Proc. Conf. on ‘Computer methods and experimental measurements for surface treatment effects II’, Milan, Italy, June 1995, Computational Mechanics Publications, 293–300.

28.

Thuvander

: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on ‘Quenching and the control of distortion’, Cleveland, OH, USA, November 1996, ASM International, 297–304.

29.

Lundbäck

, Alberg

and Henrikson

: is ‘Mathematical modelling of welding phenomena 7’, (ed. H. Cerjak et al.); 2003, Graz, Verlag der Techshen.

30.

Aoh

J. N.

and Wei

C. S.

: J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 2002, 124, 250–258.

31.

Berglund

and Runnemalm

: Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on ‘Trends in welding research’, Pine Mountain, GA, USA, April 2003, ASM International, 826–831.

32.

Josefson

B. L.

, Jonsson

, Karlsson

and Lindgren

L. E.

: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on ‘Residual stresses (ICRS-2)’, Nancy, France, November 1988, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, 497–503.

A two stage approach for the validation of welding and heat treatment models used in product development

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References