Reactive bulk rubber (EOR-g-MA) and reactive core-shell rubber (ABS-g-MA) are selected as toughening agents to toughen PA6 nanocomposites. The two blends are designed with 20 wt-% rubber phase and 3 wt-% organoclay. X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy were used to evaluate the degree of exfoliation of organoclays and morphology of the nanocomposites. The organoclay platelets are well exfoliated in the nanocomposites. At the same time, the size of the elastomer particles and interfacial adhesion between polyamide 6 and elastomers are dramatically affected by the existence of organoclay. ABS-g-MA is found to promote the toughness efficiency of PA6 than does EOR-g-MA, which reveals higher impact strength and elongation at break. However, tensile strength and Young's modulus of PA6 blends based on EOR-g-MA elastomer are higher than those based on ABS-g-MA elastomer.
OshinskiA. J., KeskkulaH. and PaulD. R.: ‘The role of matrix molecular weight in rubber toughened nylon 6 blends: 1. Morphology’, Polymer, 1996, 37, 4891–4907.
2.
OshinskiA. J., KeskkulaH. and PaulD. R.: ‘The role of matrix molecular weight in rubber toughened nylon 6 blends: 2. Room temperature Izod impact toughness’, Polymer, 1996, 37, 4909–4918. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(96)00374-6
3.
CorteL., BeaumeF. and LeiblerL: ‘Crystalline organization and toughening: example of polyamide-12’, Polymer, 2005, 46, 2748–2757. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.040
4.
BorahJ. S., KarakN. and ChakiT. K.: ‘Effect of organoclay platelets on morphology and properties of LLDPE/EMA blends’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, A528, 2820–2830. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.067
5.
WangL., ZhaoX. G. and YuJ.: ‘Effect of compounding sequence on the morphology of organoclay-filled PA6/PP/MAPP blends’, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2011, 120, 2261–2270. doi: 10.1002/app.33450
6.
WangQ., ZhuJ. Y., WangP., LiL. P., YangQ. and HuangY. J.: ‘Effect of blending sequence on the morphology and properties of polyamide 6/EPDM-g-MA/epoxy blends’, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2012, 124, 5064–5070.
7.
FornesT. D., HunterD. L. and PaulD. R.: ‘Nylon-6 nanocomposites from alkylammonium-modified clay: the role of alkyl tails on exfoliation’, Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 1793–1798. doi: 10.1021/ma0305481
8.
FornesT. D. and PaulD. R.: ‘Structure and properties of nanocomposites based on nylon-11 and -12 compared with those based on nylon-6’, Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 7698–7709. doi: 10.1021/ma048757o
9.
KrikorianV., KurianM., GalvinM. E., NowakA. P., DemingT. J. and PochanD. J.: ‘Polypeptide-based nanocomposite: structure and properties of poly(L-lysine)/Na+-montmorillonite’, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys., 2002, 40, 2579–2586. doi: 10.1002/polb.10315
10.
StretzH. A. and PaulD. R.: ‘Properties and morphology of nanocomposites based on styrenic polymers. Part I. Styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers’, Polymer, 2006, 47, 8123–8136. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.09.049
11.
StretzH. A., PaulD. R., LiR., KeskkullaH. and CassidyP. E.: ‘Intercalation and exfoliation relationships in melt-processed poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile)/montmorillonite nanocomposites’, Polymer, 2005, 46, 2621–2637. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.063
12.
LeeH. S., FasuloP. D., RodgersW. R. and PaulD. R.: ‘TPO based nanocomposites. Part 1. Morphology and mechanical properties’, Polymer, 2005, 46, 11673–11689. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.09.068
13.
AhnY. C. and PaulD. R.: ‘Rubber toughening of nylon 6 nanocomposites’, Polymer, 2006, 47, 2830–2838. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.074
14.
KimD. H., FasuloP. D., RodgersW. R. and PaulD. R.: ‘Effect of the ratio of maleated polypropylene to organoclay on the structure and properties of TPO-based nanocomposites. Part I. Morphology and mechanical properties’, Polymer, 2007, 48, 5960–5978. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.08.010
15.
DennisH. R., HunterD. L., ChangD., KimS., WhiteJ. L., ChoJ. W. and PaulD. R.: ‘Effect of melt processing conditions on the extent of exfoliation in organoclay-based nanocomposites’, Polymer, 2001, 42, 9513–9522. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00473-6
16.
ZhangZ., ZhangL., LiY. and XuH.: ‘Styrene-butadiene-styrene/ montmorillonite nanocomposites synthesized by anionic polymerization’, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2005, 99, 2273–2278. doi: 10.1002/app.22768
17.
TjongS. C. and BaoS. P.: ‘Impact fracture toughness of polyamide-6/montmorillonite nanocomposites toughened with a maleated styrene/ethylene butylene/styrene elastomer’, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys., 2005, 43, 585–595. doi: 10.1002/polb.20360
18.
MartinsC. G., LaroccaN. M., PaulD. R. and PessanL. A.: ‘Nanocomposites formed from polypropylene/EVA blends’, Polymer, 2009, 50, 1743–1754. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.01.059
19.
YooY., TiwariR. R., YooY. T. and PaulD. R.: ‘Effect of organoclay structure and mixing protocol on the toughening of amorphous polyamide/elastomer blends’, Polymer, 2010, 51, 4907–4915. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.036
20.
KhatuaB. B., LeeD. J., KimH. Y. and KimJ. K.: ‘Effect of organoclay platelets on morphology of nylon-6 and poly(ethylene-ran-propylene) rubber blends’, Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 2454–2459. doi: 10.1021/ma0352072
21.
YooY., CuiL., YoonP. J. and PaulD. R: ‘Morphology and mechanical properties of rubber toughened amorphous polyamide/MMT nanocomposites’, Macromolecules, 2010, 43, 615–624. doi: 10.1021/ma902232g
22.
WangY., ZhangQ. and FuQ.: ‘Compatibilization of immiscible poly(propylene)/polystyrene blends using clay’, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2003, 24, 231–235. doi: 10.1002/marc.200390026
23.
GelferM. Y., SongH. H., LiuL. Z., HsiaoB. S., ChuB., RafailovichM, SiM. Y. and ZaitsevV.: ‘Effects of organoclays on morphology and thermal and rheological properties of polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) blends’, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys., 2003, 41, 44–54. doi: 10.1002/polb.10360
24.
DharaiyaD. P. and JanaS. C.: ‘Nanoclay-induced morphology development in chaotic mixing of immiscible polymers’, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys., 2005, 43, 3638–3651. doi: 10.1002/polb.20657
25.
RayS. S. and BousminaM.: ‘Compatibilization efficiency of organoclay in an immiscible polycarbonate/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend’, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2005, 26, 450–455. doi: 10.1002/marc.200400586
26.
RayS. S., BousminaM. and MaazouzA.: ‘Morphology and properties of organoclay modified polycarbonate/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend’, Polym. Eng. Sci., 2006, 46, 1121–1129. doi: 10.1002/pen.20598
27.
FangZ. P., XuY. Z. and TongL. F.: ‘Effect of clay on the morphology of binary blends of polyamide 6 with high density polyethylene and HDPE-graft-acrylic acid’, Polym. Eng. Sci., 2007, 47, 551–559. doi: 10.1002/pen.20675
28.
GonzálezI., EguiazábalJ. I. and NazábalJ.: ‘Rubber-toughened polyamide 6/clay nanocomposites. Compos’, Sci. Technol., 2006, 66, 1833–1843.
29.
KontopoulouM., LiuY. Q., AustinJ. R. and ParentJ. S.: ‘The dynamics of montmorillonite clay dispersion and morphology development in immiscible ethylene-propylene rubber/polypropylene blends’, Polymer, 2007, 48, 4520–4528. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.05.068
30.
BucknallC. B.: ‘Deformation mechanisms in rubber-toughened polymers’ in ‘Polymer blends’, (ed. PaulD. R. and BucknallC. B.., 2nd edn, 83; 2000, New York, Wiley.
31.
GaymansR. J.: ‘Toughening semicrystalline thermoplastics’ in ‘Polymer blends’, (ed. PaulD. R. and BucknallC. B.., 2nd edn, 177; 2000, New York, Wiley.
32.
HuangJ. J., KeskkulaH. and PaulD. R.: ‘Elastomer particle morphology in ternary blends of maleated and non-maleated ethylene-based elastomers with polyamides: role of elastomer phase miscibility’, Polymer, 2006, 47, 624–638. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.087
33.
GadekarR., KulkamiA. and JogJ. P.: ‘Blends of nylon with polyethylene: effect of compatibilization on mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties’, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1998, 69, 161–168. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980705)69:1<161::AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-2
34.
YuZ. Z., OuY. C. and HuG. H.: ‘Influence of interfacial adhesion on toughening of polyethylene-octene elastomer/nylon 6 blends’, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1998, 60, 1711–1718. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980829)69:9<1711::AID-APP4>3.0.CO;2-E
