Fibre reinforced thermoplastic tapes are subjected to high heating and cooling rates during the tape placement process. Such high cooling rates can significantly inhibit the crystallisation of the thermoplastic polymer and thereby affect its mechanical properties, such as strength or toughness. In the present work, the crystallisation of poly(phenylene sulphide) (PPS) subjected to high cooling rates was investigated using a fast scanning calorimeter. The PPS was found to be unable to crystallise when subjected to cooling rates higher than 20°C s−1. The influence of the degree of crystallinity on fracture toughness was investigated using an essential work of fracture approach. The amount of plastic work during the fracture process was found to decrease after moderate annealing.
SchledjewskiR: ‘Thermoplastic tape placement – in situ consolidation is reachable’, Plast., Rubber Compos., 2009, 38, (9–10), 379–386.
2.
BeyelerEP, GüçeriSI: ‘Thermal analysis of laser-assisted thermoplastic-matrix composite tape consolidation’, J. Heat Transfer, 1988, 110, (2), 424–430.
3.
SonmezFO, HahnHT: ‘Modeling of heat transfer and crystallisation in thermoplastic composite tape placement process’, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 1997, 10, (3), 198–240.
4.
GrouveWJB, WarnetLL, RietmanB, AkkermanR: ‘On the weld strength of in situ tape placed reinforcements on weave reinforced structures’, Composites: Part A, 2012, 43, 1530–1536.
5.
RavindranathK, JogJP: ‘Polymer crystallisation kinetics: poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(phenylene sulfide)’, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1993, 49, (8), 1395–1403.
6.
AuerC, KalinkaG, KrauseT, HinrichsenG: ‘Crystallisation kinetics of pure and fiber-reinforced poly(phenylene sulfide)’, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1994, 51, (3), 407–413.
7.
SilvestreC, Di PaceE, NapolitanoR, PirozziB, CesarioG: ‘Crystallisation, morphology, and thermal behavior of poly(p-phenylene sulfide)’, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys., 2001, 39, (4), 415–424.
LopezLC, WilkesGL: ‘Crystallisation kinetics of poly(p-phenylene sulfide): effect of molecular weight’, J. Macromol. Sci. – Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys., 1989, C29, 83–151.
11.
CebeP: ‘Review of recent developments in poly(phenylene sulphide)’, Polym. Polym. Compos., 1995, 3, (4), 239–266.
12.
SpruiellJE, JankeCJ: ‘A review of the measurement and development of crystallinity and its relation to properties in neat poly(phenylene sulfide) and its fiber reinforced composites’, Technical report, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2004.
13.
DaviesP, BenzeggaghML, de CharentenayFX: ‘Delamination behavior of carbon fiber reinforced PPS’, SAMPE Q., 1987, 32, 134–146.
Mettler–Toledo website:http://www.mt.com (accessed 23 February 2012).
16.
MathotV, PydaM, PijpersT, Vanden PoelG, van de KerkhofE, van HerwaardenS, van HerwaardenF, LeenaersA: ‘The Flash DSC 1, a power compensation twin-type, chip-based fast scanning calorimeter (FSC): First findings on polymers’, Thermochim. Acta, 2011, 522, (1–2), 36–45.
17.
van HerwaardenS, IervolinoE, van HerwaardenF, WijffelsT, LeenaersA, MathotV: ‘Design, performance and analysis of thermal lag of the UFS1 twin-calorimeter chip for fast scanning calorimetry using the Mettler–Toledo Flash DSC 1’, Thermochim. Acta, 2011, 522, (1–2), 46–52.
18.
IervolinoE, van HerwaardenAW, van HerwaardenFG, van de KerkhofE, van GrinsvenPPW, LeenaersACHI, MathotVBF, SarroPM: ‘Temperature calibration and electrical characterization of the differential scanning calorimeter chip UFS1 for the Mettler–Toledo Flash DSC 1, Thermochim. Acta, 2011, 522, (1–2), 53–59.
19.
Vanden PoelG: ‘Performance and calibration of the Flash DSC 1, a new, MEMS-based fast scanning calorimeter’, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2012, 110, (3), 1533–1546.
HashemiS: ‘Effect of temperature on fracture toughness on an amorphous poly(ether-ether ketone) film using essential work of fracture analysis’, Polym. Test., 2003, 22, 589–599.
22.
CotterellB, ReddelJK: ‘The essential work of plane stress ductile fracture’, Int. J. Fract., 1977, 13, (3), 267–277.
23.
MaiYW, CotterellB: ‘On the essential work of ductile fracture in polymers’, Int. J. Fract., 1986, 32, (2), 105–125.
24.
MaiYW, WongSC, ChenXH: ‘Application of fracture mechanics for characterization of toughness of polymer blends’, Polym. Blends, 2000, 2, 17–58.
25.
BárányT, CzigányT, Karger-KocsisJ: ‘Application of the essential work of fracture (EWF) concept for polymers, related blends and composites: a review’, Prog. Polym. Sci. (Oxford), 2010, 35, (10), 1257–1287.
26.
CasellasJJ, FrontiniPM, CarellaJM: ‘Fracture characterization of low-density polyethylenes by the essential work of fracture: changes induced by thermal treatments and testing temperature’, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1999, 74, (4), 781–796.
27.
LvR, XuW, NaB, YanJ: ‘Correlation of mechanical behaviors with crystalline phase and related cavitation in isotactic polypropylene’, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2008, 108, (5), 3185–3190.
28.
CluttonE: ‘Essential work of fracture’, in ‘Fracture mechanics testing methods for polymers, adhesives and composites’, Vol. 28 (European Structural Integrity Society), 177–195; 2001, Oxford, Elsevier.
