The mining industry routinely collects samples to assist with decision making, whether for exploration, resource estimation, grade control, or plant design and balances. Poorly designed sampling protocols can result in elevated project risk by increasing variability. Critically, such variability produces both financial and intangible losses. Sample collection, preparation and assay or test work protocols that are optimised to suit the ore type, together with QAQC systems will reduce variability. Many gold deposits display a high natural variability, where the in situ variability can be enhanced by poor sampling practice to yield a high-nugget effect. In this case, specialised protocols are often required. Reporting codes require the Competent Person to consider the quality and implication of sampling programmes. Despite its importance, sampling often does not receive the attention it deserves. In this paper, the importance of good sampling practice is exemplified through a series of case studies, which show the many sampling issues that frequently go unrecognised or unaddressed, resulting in poor decisions and financial loss.
AbzalovM. Z.2008. Quality control of assay data: a review of procedures for measuring and monitoring precision and accuracy, Exploration and Mining Geology, 17, 131–144.
2.
AfewuK. I. and LewisG. O.1998. Sampling a run-of-mine mill feed – a practical approach, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 98, 299–304.
3.
AnnelsA. E. and DominyS. C.2003. Core recovery and quality: important factors in mineral resource estimation, Applied Earth Sciences Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, 112, 305–311.
4.
BazinC., HodouinD. and BlondinR. M.2013. Estimation of the variance of the fundamental error associated to the sampling of low grade ores, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 124, 117–123.
5.
CarrascoP. C.2009. Nugget effect – artificial or natural?Proceedings of World Conference on Sampling and Blending, 211–217, Johannesburg, Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
6.
CarrascoP. C., CarrascoP. and JaraE.2004. The economic impact of incorrect sampling and analysis practices in the copper mining industry, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 74, 209–214.
7.
ChieregatiA. C., El HajjT. M., ImotoC. F. and PignatariL. E. C.2015. Validation of reverse circulation drilling rig for reconciliation purposes, TOS Forum, 5, 105–110.
8.
CintraE. C., ScaboraJ. A., ViegasE. P., BarataR. and MaiaG. F.2007. Coarse gold sampling at Sao Francisco mine, Brazil, in Proceedings of World Conference on Sampling and Blending, 187–197, Porto Alegro, Fundacao Luiz Englert.
9.
ClarkF. and CarswellJ. T.2014. Using RC drilling to improve sampling in a complex underground gold operation – approach to underground grade control at the Sunrise Dam mine, WA, in Proceedings of International Mining Geology Conference, 143–152, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
10.
CossioS., NoyolaJ. -L., GonzalezP. and EspinosaR.2004. Sampling and assaying of coarse gold at La Herradura, Mexico, CIM Bulletin, 1084, 1–5.
11.
DominyS. C.2010. Grab sampling for underground gold mine grade control, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 110, (2010), 277–287.
12.
DominyS. C. and PetersenJ. S.2005. Sampling coarse gold-bearing mineralisation – developing effective protocols and a case study from the Nalunaq mine, southern Greenland, in Proceedings of World Conference on Sampling and Blending, 151–165, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
13.
DominyS. C.2014a. Predicting the unpredictable – evaluating high-nugget effect gold deposits, in Mineral resource and ore reserve estimation, 659–678, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
14.
DominyS. C.2014b. Effects of sample mass on gravity recoverable gold test results in low grade ores, Applied Earth Sciences Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, 123, 234–242.
15.
DominyS. C. and PlattenI. M.2007. Gold particle clustering – a new consideration in sampling applications, Applied Earth Sciences Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, 116, 130–142.
16.
DominyS. C. and XieY.2016. Optimising sampling protocols via the heterogeneity test: challenges in coarse gold mineralisation, Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, in pressX.
17.
DominyS. C., JohansenG. F., AnnelsA. E. and CuffleyB. W.2000. General considerations of sampling and assaying in a coarse gold environment, Applied Earth Sciences Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, 109, 145–167.
18.
DominyS. C., NoppéM. A. and AnnelsA. E.2004. Errors and uncertainty in mineral resource and ore reserve estimation: the importance of getting it right, Exploration and Mining Geology, 11, 77–98.
19.
DominyS. C., PlattenI. M., HowardL. E., BellR-M., XieY. and MinnittR. C. A.2012. Determination of the sampling liberation diameter in a high-grade coarse gold ore by high-resolution X-ray computed tomography, in Proceedings of Sampling Conference, 161–169, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
20.
DominyS. C., PlattenI. M., XieY. and MinnittR. C. A.2011. Underground grade control protocol design: case study from the Liphichi gold project, Larecaja, Bolivia, Applied Earth Sciences Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, 119, 205–219.
21.
DominyS. C., XieY. and PlattenI. M.2008. Gold particle characteristics in narrow vein deposits: implications for evaluation and metallurgy, in Proceedings of Narrow Vein Mining Conference, 91–104, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
EsbensenK. H. and Paasch-MortensenP.2010. Process sampling: theory of sampling – the missing link in process analytical technologies, in process analytical technology. 37–80, Chichester, Wiley.
24.
FallonM., RowleyM., Du PlessisE., GolenyaF., RobertsonI. and SwansonR.2012. Confirming the sampling, sample preparation and assaying protocols used at two Yilgarn gold deposits, in Proceedings of Sampling Conference, 47–62, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
25.
François-BongarçonD. M.1993. The practice of the sampling theory of broken ores, CIM Bulletin, 86, 75–81.
26.
François-BongarçonD. M.1998. Extensions to the demonstration of Gy's formula, Exploration and Mining Geology, 7, 149–154.
27.
François-BongarçonD. M.2004. Theory of sampling and geostatistics: an intimate link, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 74, 143–148.
28.
François-BongarçonD. M.2008. A brief history of Pierre Gy's sampling theory and current trends in its acceptance in the mining world, in Proceedings of Sampling Conference, 13–14, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
29.
François-BongarçonD. M.2014. State of affairs and current research trends in theory of sampling fundamentals, including segregation and correctness, in Proceedings of Sampling Conference, 11–15, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
30.
François-BongarçonD. M.2015. Future challenges and research: theory of sampling (TOS), TOS Forum, 3, 4–5.
31.
François-BongarçonD. M. and GyP. M.2002. The most common error in applying Gy's formula in the theory of mineral sampling and the history of the liberation factor, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 102, 475–479.
32.
GeelhoedB.2011. Is Gy's formula for the fundamental sampling error accurate?, Experimental evidence, Minerals Engineering, 24, 169–173.
33.
GiblettA., DunneR. and McCafferyK.2012. Defining practical metallurgical accounting discrepancy limits for gold operations, in Proceedings of Mill Operators Conference, 3–9, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
34.
GonzalesP. and CossioS.2007. A review of sampling protocol for a gold ore based on liberation study, in Proceedings of World Conference on Sampling and Blending, 163–174, Porto Alegre, Fundacao Luiz Englert.
35.
GuresinN., LorenzenL., DominyS. C., MullerH. and CooperA.2012. Importance of effective sampling and test work protocols for process plant design, in Proceedings of Sampling Conference, 95–107, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
36.
GyP. M.1982. Sampling of particulate materials, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
37.
GyP. M.2004. Sampling of discrete minerals – a new introduction to the theory of sampling I: qualitative approach, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 74, 7–24.
38.
HolmesR. J.2004. Correct sampling and measurement – the foundation of metallurgical accounting, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 74, 71–83.
39.
HolmesR. J.2015. Sample station design and operation, TOS Forum, 5, 119–128.
40.
JORC. 2012. Australasian code for reporting of exploration results, mineral resources and ore reserves, the JORC code. Joint Ore Reserves Committee of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia.
41.
LymanG. J. and SchouwstraR.2011. Use of scanning electron microscope to determine the sampling constant and liberation factor for fine materials, in Proceedings of World Conference on Sampling and Blending, 89–103, Santiago, Gecamin.
42.
MagriE. J.2007. Some experiences in heterogeneity tests and mine sampling, in Proceedings of World Conference on Sampling and Blending, 329–348, Porto Alegre, Fundacao Luiz Englert.
43.
MinnittR. C. A.2007. Sampling: the impact on costs and decision making, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 107, 451–462.
44.
MinnittR. C. A.2013. Sampling in the South African minerals industry, in Proceedings of Sampling and Analysis Conference, 1–28, Johannesburg, Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
45.
MinnittR. C. A. and Assibey-BonsuW.2010. A comparison between the duplicate series method and the heterogeneity test as methods for calculating the sampling constants, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 110, 251–268.
46.
MinnittR. C. A., RiceP. M. and SpangenbegC.2007. Part 2: experimental calibration of sampling parameters K and alpha for Gy's formula by the sampling tree method, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 107, 513–518.
47.
MorrisonR. and PowellM.2006. Design for sampling – preliminary exploration, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 106, 697–706.
48.
PetersenL., DahlC. K. and EsbensenK. H.2004. Representative mass reduction in sampling – a critical survey of techniques and hardware, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 74, 95–114.
49.
PitardF. F.1993. Pierre Gy's sampling theory and sampling practice, Boca Raton, CRC Press.
50.
PitardF. F.2004. Effects of residual variances on the estimation of the variance of the fundamental error, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 74, 149–164.
51.
PitardF. F.2007. The in-situ nugget effect: a major component of the random term of a variogram, in Proceedings of World Conference on Sampling and Blending, 91–110, Porto Alegre, Fundacao Luiz Englert.
52.
PitardF. F.2008. Blasthole sampling for grade control – the many problems and solutions, in Proceedings of Sampling Conference, 15–21, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
53.
PitardF. F.2009. Pierre Gy's theory of sampling and C.O. ingamells poisson process approach: pathways to representative sampling and appropriate industry standards. Doctoral Thesis, Esberg, Aalborg University.
54.
PitardF. F.2013. Guidelines for acceptable allotted sampling uncertainty, in Proceedings of World Conference on Sampling and Blending, 89–98, Santiago, Gecamin.
55.
PitardF. F.2015. The advantages and pitfalls of conventional heterogeneity tests and a suggest alternative, TOS Forum, 5, 13–18.
56.
PitardF. F. and François-BongarçonD. M.2011. Demystifying the fundamental and grouping and segregation error for practitioners, in Proceedings of World Conference on Sampling and Blending, 39–55, Santiago, Gecamin.
57.
PitardF. F. and LymanG.2013. Single and multi-stage Poisson processes: a case study for gold exploration, in Proceedings of World Conference on Sampling and Blending, 371–385, Santiago, Gecamin.
58.
PitardF. F., EsbensenK. H. and PaolettiC.2015. TOS: progress through continuity and community, TOS Forum, 4, 25–27.
59.
PlattenI. M. and DominyS. C.2003. The occurrence of high-grade gold pockets in quartz reefs at the Gwynfynydd mine, Wales, United Kingdom: a geological explanation of the nugget effect, Exploration and Mining Geology, 10, 249–272.
60.
RoyleA. G.1989. Splitting gold assay pulps containing coarse gold particles, Leeds University Mining Association Journal, 63–68.
61.
RoyleA. G.1991. Safe sampling formulae for gold deposits, Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, 100, 84–86.
62.
SimonA. and GossonG.2010. Considerations on QAQC and sampling security, in Proceedings of Sampling Conference, 135–140, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
63.
SketchleyD. A.1998. Gold deposits: establishing sampling protocols and monitoring quality control, Exploration and Mining Geology, 7, 129–138.
64.
SpangenbergC.2011. The status of sampling practice in the gold mining industry of Africa, in Proceedings of World Conference on Sampling and Blending, 105–112, Santiago, Gecamin.
